Jaranja said:
Thaius said:
There is no point of being in a relationship if you're going to be sleeping around. Sex is, whether you like it or not, a display of love. It's a physical way to display love and commitment. To think of it as nothing more than reproductive recreation is to deny one of the things that makes humanity civilized rather than animalistic. If you actually love someone, you won't want to be screwing other people.
I just don't like the feel of this post. Mainly the "Sex is, whether you like it or not, a display of love" part is throwing me off. Why? Is that an absolute for everyone? I'm calling bullshit.
I suppose I should have worded it differently. The point was that, culturally, sex means something (or at least it should: it's been defiled plenty in recent years, but the idea is still that sex means love). Point being, you'll be hard-pressed to find someone who wouldn't think you're a douche if you're married and sleeping around, let along a wife who'd be okay with it. It may be an area where you have to decide whether your own views are worth being estranged from society as such, but sociologically the idea doesn't work out either. The "family unit" is an incredibly important part of any society, and is absolutely vital to the functionality of any society. To take the exclusivity of sex out of that concept would be a huge blow. Things like this are the things that separate us from animals: we are cultured, and can create a society in which we can all coexist. The family unit (and thus, sexual exclusivity) is one of many things that, if eliminated from society, could cause a complete collapse of it (I know it sounds melodramatic, but I cannot stress the importance of this concept to a working society).
So it's not necessarily an absolute for everyone: I believe it is, but I don't expect everyone to go by the same belief system as I. Point is, you may think like this, but society as a whole has an extremely good reason to disagree.