Nah man. Screwing around with multiple girls is fine if you are single. However, once you tell a girl that she is the one you'd like to try and build up a relationship with, you've got to stick to it until you've told her you've decided against it.
I know how you feel. I would like to think I could do the polygamy thing but it seems to just cheapen the deal for me (I have never tried it, just thought experiments). That and I would get jealous quickly. However, polygamy is alright in my book as far as other people doing it. Although I can do one night stands and friends with benefits really easily.Sleekgiant said:Well I believe sexual intercourse is one of the strongest displays of emotion, therefore just screwing around with anyone you want is rather deceitful to me.
So monogamy for me![]()
In many ways, sex is meant to be a strong point of a relationship hence why it used to be sex after marrige, kindof the highlight of the relationship. I would definatly not like it if my boyfriend decided to "mess around" with other women as variety. If you dont like the sex with your partner, tough. She/he might have the best loving personality, and in all other ways, be the best partner your going to find. Why the hell not just ignore that the sex might not be good, and just love them for who they are.Jaranja said:I, personally, don't associate sex with love. So, I think being with the one you love and fucking around is perfectly acceptable. Of course, I'm not in it to deceive my partner, they would know and be free to do the same.
The reason why there's this whole "One girl for one guy" thing in relationships is, in my opinion, because people are just so jealous.
Let's hear your views. I'll try and reply to some posts when I get back to my computer.
Sleekgiant said:Well I believe sexual intercourse is one of the strongest displays of emotion, therefore just screwing around with anyone you want is rather deceitful to me.
So monogamy for me![]()
Keyhole. Sometimes the word is more simple than you think.Zwilorg said:Absolutely not on my part! if my gf asked how i would feel about it and that she wanted to do it, i would leave her...
but she doesnt so every1 is happy ^^
has someone always says only 1 key to a (dunno the word) (hole in the door, to insert the key mencioned before).
Basically this. And why would I want someone else when I have a man who satisfies my every need? I love my guy, and an open relationship would never work. I don't believe in it nor do I want it.Anachronism said:Pretty much this. Sex is one of the most amazing things a couple can experience. Good sex should always be more than just physical; it has the potential to be a phenomenal emotional and spiritual connection. As such, it should be reserved for someone you actually care about rather than someone you just met.Sleekgiant said:Well I believe sexual intercourse is one of the strongest displays of emotion
it can if people can handle it given certian rules, but many try and realize they can't. People explore that kind of thing all the time.-Torchedini- said:Nope shouldn't work. There will always be one left out then. Or feel like it.
Well sir, you are quite correct in that sexual exclusivity is a societal norm, however I must disagree with you insofar as it being a societal necessity. Take, for example, the Islamic world where sexual exclusivity is the exception and not the norm. Sure, good parts of the Muslim world remains undeveloped, but if you can show me that the blame for their relative non-industrialization is purely due to sexual non-exclusivity, then I'll eat my hat.Thaius said:I suppose I should have worded it differently. The point was that, culturally, sex means something (or at least it should: it's been defiled plenty in recent years, but the idea is still that sex means love). Point being, you'll be hard-pressed to find someone who wouldn't think you're a douche if you're married and sleeping around, let along a wife who'd be okay with it. It may be an area where you have to decide whether your own views are worth being estranged from society as such, but sociologically the idea doesn't work out either. The "family unit" is an incredibly important part of any society, and is absolutely vital to the functionality of any society. To take the exclusivity of sex out of that concept would be a huge blow. Things like this are the things that separate us from animals: we are cultured, and can create a society in which we can all coexist. The family unit (and thus, sexual exclusivity) is one of many things that, if eliminated from society, could cause a complete collapse of it (I know it sounds melodramatic, but I cannot stress the importance of this concept to a working society).Jaranja said:I just don't like the feel of this post. Mainly the "Sex is, whether you like it or not, a display of love" part is throwing me off. Why? Is that an absolute for everyone? I'm calling bullshit.Thaius said:There is no point of being in a relationship if you're going to be sleeping around. Sex is, whether you like it or not, a display of love. It's a physical way to display love and commitment. To think of it as nothing more than reproductive recreation is to deny one of the things that makes humanity civilized rather than animalistic. If you actually love someone, you won't want to be screwing other people.
So it's not necessarily an absolute for everyone: I believe it is, but I don't expect everyone to go by the same belief system as I. Point is, you may think like this, but society as a whole has an extremely good reason to disagree.
Um... keyhole?Zwilorg said:Absolutely not on my part! if my gf asked how i would feel about it and that she wanted to do it, i would leave her...
but she doesnt so every1 is happy ^^
has someone always says only 1 key to a (dunno the word) (hole in the door, to insert the key mencioned before).