Wyatt said:
as i often do when i see something like this , i try and 'flip it' to what would have been reported if these parents werent reported and it turned out they WERE pedos and those 'harmless' pictures were nothing of the kind, or just the few that somehow got left on the card after the ones showing daddy diddling them were deleted.
i say this, the pictures COULD have been evidence in something more than innocent bath time photos. the person reporting them did the proper thing imo and the agency charged with child welfare checked it out, seems to have found nothing wrong, the parents get their children back and move on.
if i was the parents, if anything id be HAPPY that i had a local CPS that was on the ball and doing their job for a change. we as a society ***** when things 'slip through the cracks' then when someone trys to make sure that it doesnt happen we seem to want to ***** about THAT.
i think its a fine thing it got reported, it got investigated and the children (who ARE after all the main concirne here) were protected. so it turned out nothing untword was going on, so what? better to be safe than sorry. and id certianly want judgments about what kind of nude childrens photos are ok being decided by a CPS investigation, than too leave it up to the judgment of the local photo-hut flunky.
Hold on, I can't figure out weather or not you're serious...
The main problem with this line of thinking is THE EMOTIONAL DAMAGE caused by the frankly stupid misinterpretation of innocent family photographs... most people never recover from charges of child pornography, as I am sure we all know. Not to mention the trauma of having your kids taken away... over something stupid?
And you think you would be HAPPY if a bunch of agents raided your home, took away your children and told your friends and neighbors that you were a pedophile? This story is about more then a simple mistake made on the part of the police leading to a false accusation... this is about a couple having their names dragged through the dirt LITERALLY for being completely normal. It's just wrong, and several people should lose their jobs over this. Perhaps have their names dragged through the dirt.
On a side note... I see absolutely NO reason to simply assume that wall mart employees, in part or in general, are stupid. People have reasons for getting jobs at those kinds of places... maybe they couldn't afford to get a college education? Maybe the economy sucks, and now the have no viable career as an auto-mechanic? Maybe without people to do the jobs that you might think of as low our society would crash burning to the ground?
Are there stupid wall mart employees? Yes. Are there stupid everything else? yes! God, sometimes the sheer ignorance of people baffles me. I happen to be in the market for a new job, and I am looking at wall mart as a possible employer; does that make me any less intelligent then any of you?
whew... ok, my ranting is done. Time to watch Zero Punctuation
