Parents accused of sexual abuse for taking pictures of their kids

Recommended Videos

bug_chaser

New member
Mar 15, 2009
54
0
0
The Wal-Mart employees probably are stupid but they are mandated by state law to report certain types of pictures, and that's probably a good thing because most Wal-Mart employees are stupid and we don't want them exercising their own judgment. It's the investigating DCF agents that should be blamed here.

It all seems pretty obvious to me but then again I haven't seen the pictures and would hate to hear about parents that were sexually abusing their children and having photographs of the abuse developed at the local Wal-Mart and nobody noticed or looked into it.

ETA I never said or meant to imply these parents were pedophiles or that it is abusive to take naked shots of your own children.
 

Spirultima

New member
Jul 25, 2008
1,464
0
0
Christ, people are getting more stupid by the minute, every time i read something in the news, or watch it on the TV, i lose just that little bit more of my thin strand of human faith each time.
 

Aeryn Seoung

New member
Aug 21, 2009
103
0
0
Jesus christ, what is the world coming too? This reminds me of a similar stupid ass story that happened here in the UK.

A mother took her daughter with her grocery shopping, and you know what kids are like? They kick and scream and complain etcetc. So the Mother, after packing everything into the car, takes her child, and locks her in the car while she goes and puts back the shopping trolley [Which was only a few metres away] Someone notified the police and said it was child abuse.
 

Julianking93

New member
May 16, 2009
14,715
0
0
I would have understood if it was just some dumbass Walmart employee who thought they were child molesters, but the police?

How stupid are these people?
 

MelziGurl

New member
Jan 16, 2009
1,096
0
0
My parents have quite a few pictures of me in the bath as a child, they are purely innocent. The employee just wanted a few moments of fame and glory for discovering bath time photos and passing them off as "pornographic", regardless of what happened.
 

bluepilot

New member
Jul 10, 2009
1,150
0
0
asinann said:
bluepilot said:
You cannot trust anyone these days.

What right did walmart have to look at the photographs anyway?

Plus there was no evidence of sexual abuse, just some kids, their own kids, splashing about in a bath.

If taking pictures of your own children in the bath warrents sexual abuse, most of our parents would be in prison right now.

I hope they win this one. Common sense needs this win.
To develop pictures, the person developing the pictures has to see them. Either that or they can blindfold themselves and hope the pictures are done developing when they are pulled out of the solution. And that they don't bump into anything sensitive causing chemical burns on themselves.
You are very right to say that it would be impractical to develop photographs without sight. However, these days many photographs are not developed as such, but printed from a digital image into special paper. So I think, with the modern method, there is no need to look at the photographs.

However, since I do not know what method was employed, I cannot comment any further.
 

stabnex

New member
Jun 30, 2009
1,039
0
0
These right here are the reasons mass murderers exist. The self-proclaimed self-righteous trampling on people they don't know or care about.
 

Swaki

New member
Apr 15, 2009
2,013
0
0
would be nice if people where like that in denmark too, then my mom wouldn't have a shitload of naked pictures of me and my sis, but honestly i hope they win, whats the next thing? you cant bathe your child's or change their diapers because a couple hundred creeps out there would find it arousing
 

Liquid Paradox

New member
Jul 19, 2009
303
0
0
Wyatt said:
as i often do when i see something like this , i try and 'flip it' to what would have been reported if these parents werent reported and it turned out they WERE pedos and those 'harmless' pictures were nothing of the kind, or just the few that somehow got left on the card after the ones showing daddy diddling them were deleted.

i say this, the pictures COULD have been evidence in something more than innocent bath time photos. the person reporting them did the proper thing imo and the agency charged with child welfare checked it out, seems to have found nothing wrong, the parents get their children back and move on.

if i was the parents, if anything id be HAPPY that i had a local CPS that was on the ball and doing their job for a change. we as a society ***** when things 'slip through the cracks' then when someone trys to make sure that it doesnt happen we seem to want to ***** about THAT.
i think its a fine thing it got reported, it got investigated and the children (who ARE after all the main concirne here) were protected. so it turned out nothing untword was going on, so what? better to be safe than sorry. and id certianly want judgments about what kind of nude childrens photos are ok being decided by a CPS investigation, than too leave it up to the judgment of the local photo-hut flunky.
Hold on, I can't figure out weather or not you're serious...

The main problem with this line of thinking is THE EMOTIONAL DAMAGE caused by the frankly stupid misinterpretation of innocent family photographs... most people never recover from charges of child pornography, as I am sure we all know. Not to mention the trauma of having your kids taken away... over something stupid?

And you think you would be HAPPY if a bunch of agents raided your home, took away your children and told your friends and neighbors that you were a pedophile? This story is about more then a simple mistake made on the part of the police leading to a false accusation... this is about a couple having their names dragged through the dirt LITERALLY for being completely normal. It's just wrong, and several people should lose their jobs over this. Perhaps have their names dragged through the dirt.

On a side note... I see absolutely NO reason to simply assume that wall mart employees, in part or in general, are stupid. People have reasons for getting jobs at those kinds of places... maybe they couldn't afford to get a college education? Maybe the economy sucks, and now the have no viable career as an auto-mechanic? Maybe without people to do the jobs that you might think of as low our society would crash burning to the ground?

Are there stupid wall mart employees? Yes. Are there stupid everything else? yes! God, sometimes the sheer ignorance of people baffles me. I happen to be in the market for a new job, and I am looking at wall mart as a possible employer; does that make me any less intelligent then any of you?

whew... ok, my ranting is done. Time to watch Zero Punctuation ;)
 

IxionIndustries

New member
Mar 18, 2009
2,237
0
0
This shit is just downright retarded. One of my friends, he brought a picture of his baby sister to school, to show all of his lady friends, and he got suspended for possession of "Child Pornography".. Simply because his sister was 6 months old, and was wearing just a diaper.

I'm really starting to hate this bullshit, and it's getting way out of hand. Fuck the U.S.
I mean, It's like we're reverting back to the fucking Puritan age, but on an extreme fucking level!!!
 

Baby Tea

Just Ask Frankie
Sep 18, 2008
4,687
0
0
azurawolf said:
o.o
I thought every parent did that.
Most do! My parents totally have pictures of my little bare ass when I was in the tub as a young boy!
It's used a leverage when dates come over! It's a tradition!

Slightly more seriously: This is pretty ridiculous. Wal-Mart employees are not the police. And while I understand the need to report illegal child pornography and abuse to authorities...tub pictures? Come on. Seriously.
 

MrSnugglesworth

Into the Wild Green Snuggle
Jan 15, 2009
3,232
0
0
If it was anywhere else in the house I can understand it.


But its in the fucking bath. What parents DON'T do that?
 

fletch_talon

Elite Member
Nov 6, 2008
1,461
0
41
Fredrick2003 said:
stinkychops said:
Fredrick2003 said:
This is why I say the pedophile hysteria is just pointless.

Eventually pedophiles will be accepted and you can hate something else, these things go in cycles.

It wasn't very long ago it was perfectly acceptable to think of black people as lesser beings, now all of a sudden saying such things will shock people.

It wasn't very long ago it was perfectly acceptable to make fun of homosexual people, and point out how their "brains are defective". Nowadays this is not acceptable.

Pedophiles are next, all of a sudden your "kiddy fiddler" jokes will be looked down upon.
No bloody way they will.
Alright so I think people misunderstood what I said.

Pedophiles and people who have sex with children are too separate things.
Kinda. All people who have sex with children are paedophiles, but not all paedophiles have sex with children.
I assume the point you are trying to make is that eventually it will be understood that paedophiles are not evil, but have a problem, whether psychological or genetic.
I agree entirely, its a sexual preference just like sado-masochism, beastiality and homosexuality. The difference however comes from the fact that preferences such as beastiality and paedophilia involve non consenting parties, or individuals without the level of intelligence/maturity to give said consent.

So whilst I can agree that paedophiles need to be accepted as human beings with a problem that needs to be fixed, I can't say I believe it will ever be accepted by society, purely because acting on the impulses that come with it is harmful to society.
 

Switchlurk

New member
Jul 10, 2009
76
0
0
Emilie Diabolica said:
Mr.Pandah said:
Emilie Diabolica said:
what.... the.... fuck....!

this is another reason why americans as a whole have such a bad name in other countries.
(no offence to you normal americans, i'm referring to the general stereotype)

well i think kudos to the parents for sueing walmart, though really they dont have much of a chance, seeing as they're fighting against a corporate giant with the best lawyers, mountains of money, etc...

...What does this have to do with Americans? Other than it taking place in America?
Because this wouldn't happen anywhere else besides the US. The level of paranoia over there is insane. This would never happen in Australia, people tend to be more level-headed.
Hear Hear. Only in America would this happen. Not the suggestion of sexual abuse by some cockgoblin of a employee, granted, that could happen anywhere. But only in America would the entire process go as far as the kids ACTUALLY BEING TAKEN AWAY by child services before someone says "what the fuck?". To get to that point it would have been put past the store manager, then to some level of relevant authority like the police, who then would have put it to child services,who would have then taken people over to take away the kids. HOW IN HELL did it get this far without someone piping up saying "Wait a minute, this is totally normal, there's absolutely no ground for sexual abuse". The only place IN THE WORLD where it would get to that stage is America, because you have a bunch of paranoid panicky twats over there who will jump at the first opportunity to blow shit out of proportion.

P.S No offense to any level headed Americans reading this. For the most part you're a fun bunch.