stroopwafel said:
Unless you're a PC hobbyist and/or really enjoy niche genres you can only find on PC and/or really want to dig up old PC games and accumulate a monstrous backlog of dated and shitty games you'll never play anyway than I never understood why people would ever prefer the hassle of a PC over a console. When you buy a game for PS4 you know the game will always play, that the game updates automatically, that the OS won't crash or give you infinite headaches with driver gibberish, that the game is optimized for that particular system etc.
Sounds exactly like my PC gaming experience. I buy a game, and I know it will always play, the game updates automatically, the OS never crashes [Unless I leave it running without turning it off or hibernating for 6 months, but I think that's a bit excessive], drivers are all automatic and half the time I turn off the automatic and just don't bother updating them, PC brute forces its way through poor optimisation in the few games that aren't optimised to run on a PC [Seeing as that's what the 1 and 4 are, cheap PCs these days. No different architecture: Optimisation for one is very similar to optimisation for the lot of them].
Why would I want to buy a console and go through the hassle of NEEDING to update to do things, or having to fight for use of the TV, of missing out on some of my favourite game genres, of hoping it doesn't RRoD like something like 30% of the original 360s did. Why go through that hassle when my PC will just work, always?
And hell, its not like I just play mainstream games. I'm playing things 20 years old, and it don't run into any problems. I play the latest most intensive games, and don't hit any problems. I play side indie hits that are programmed by newbies, and I don't run into any problems. All these 'problems' with PC gaming are just myths these days. If you spent as long looking at a PC as you do figuring out that a PS4 won't run Xbox1 games, then you're fine. The problems just don't exist anymore, and haven't in any real way since Windows ME.
Also high-end PC specs in the end mean nothing compared to the marketing prowess of consoles. Without consoles modern AAA games wouldn't even exist and PCs would still be stuck in the dark ages of DOS adventure games and flight simulators.
Yeaaaah.... No.
If it was just consoles, we'd be stuck in the dark ages of the PS1 era. Because consoles don't want to update. Why update when you can keep the same machine there for 10 years and reap in the profits?
PCs always update, and their innovation forces consoles to innovate. Without that, consoles just sit on the same shit all year long. I'd also say to take a look at the gaming ecosystem of consoles, and of that on PC, and tell me which one innovates more with its games. Again, its consoles. PCs were also making big money for a long time before consoles really caught on with the PS1 and N64.
What consoles have done, is standardised the AAA market and stagnated the industry. They are not the drivers of innovation, they're the ones that want to prevent it because they might need to sell a new console that people don't want, or might need to make a game that doesn't need to cater to 20 million people to turn a profit.
Meanwhilst in PC land, Blizzard has long been raking in the dough from WoW, Starcraft, Warcraft, and Diablo. Firaxis has built a large cult following for things like the Civilization series, and Creative Assembly have been very successful with their Total War franchise. And again, this is without going into all the cool niche games that exist like Dwarf Fortress or Kerbal Space Program.
PC has always driven the development of the industry. Its always at the forefront of technology, expanding the capabilities of the industry, whilst harboring many profitable companies that don't focus on spending a fortune trying to copy another game that's already out there, but spend it less money trying to do something different - and often succeeding because of it.
Not that consoles are perfect but they are relatively cheap and convenient and play all the new releases you want. I never understood why people would want to spend so much money just to play a videogame. But to each their own I guess.
Define so much money. ~$600 and I get a mid-high end gaming PC [~$900 and I get a mid-high end gaming laptop], as well as a machine necessary for my work, that comes with thousands of free games online not including free to play titles, and which I can play every game I have ever owned for the PC on, even if that game is 3 decades old.
Why would I spend $400 on a console, to play one or two games, look at all the clones of them and say nope, and then spend the same amount a few years later to get the 'new' console, to again buy those same one or two games - but lose the ability to play my old games in the process because I traded in to get the new one a little cheaper.
I mean, honestly, I'd call consoles anything but cheap. They do one thing; Play games. They cost ~$400 to do so. If I wanted that, I'd buy a Nintendo DS or something - <$200, and plays plenty of games. PC, sure, a little more expensive, but whether I was a PC gamer or not, I'd have one. Need it for prgoramming, CAD, video editing, and much more convenient note taking/communication/internet browsing/document checking - ect. on the go in the form of a laptop, let alone all the extra abilities it has when paired with even basic accessories. I spend ~$600-900 for a way of life. Why would I spend ~$400 just to play some games, and then not actually be able to play anything because I need to purchase at least 1 $100 game [Thanks 'Straya] on top of that to play something?
Call of Duty/Halo/Battlefield is not worth an extra $300 compared to a DS and Majoras mask, or Pokemon, or Smash bros, or W/E. I don't get why anyone would buy a console, too expensive for what they offer, and to make up for the deficits of not owning a PC I'd need to spend several hundred extra on a tablet and phone, and a cheaper PC, and keep them updated more regularly. Its just far cheaper and easier to make my PC a one stop shop than it is to buy 3-5 separate devices that are obsolete from one.