pedophilia: double standard

Recommended Videos

capin Rob

New member
Apr 2, 2010
7,447
0
0
Kharloth said:
Oh, well, I brought a good point up.
capin Rob said:
Because in the public view, the boy is a sex craving hound that wants some pussy, and the teen girl is a perfect haven of purity who would want nothing to do with sex.
 

newfoundsky

New member
Feb 9, 2010
576
0
0
knight steel said:
I hold no double standard and in both cases the pedophile should be sent to prison. All further punishment would then be imposed by the prison population.

But, you are correct in your assessment that the majority of people have a double standard when it comes to that. And it's disgusting.
 

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,662
0
0
geldonyetich said:
knight steel said:
If a 13 year boy willing has sexual relations with a very attractive 26 year old teacher most of us would find that ok saying stuff like "that lucky bastard" and would opt for no real punishment on the women behalf.
Well, here's your problem right there: false premise.

In fact, it was pretty big news not too long ago when a 32-year-old woman picked up a relationship with a 16-year-old-boy [http://www.xboxist.com/xbox-360/news/32-year-old-woman-pleads-guilty-to-xbox-live-video-sex-010621.php].

She was tried and convicted with 10 years of prison and is now a registered sex offender.

If that was what happened with a 16-year-old, don't think they'd go any easier on adult women going after on 13-year-old.
I don't think his premise was wrong entirely. Yes, there are women sex offenders out there and convictions in the realm do happen. But, like most things dealing with sex there remains a double standard in perception.

Gay scenes in movies between men are incredibly taboo and on the rare occasion that they occur there is an uproar associated with it. By contrast, plenty of movies deal with gay women or women experimenting with lesibianism and nobody bats an eyelash. The mere implication that a man has engaged in improper sexual behavior in the workplace is sufficient to ensure the man is fired unless bullet proof evidence to the contrary can be presented. By contrast, one must actually demonstrate considerable evidence of the same activity by women in order for a fuss to be raised. An act that is considered innapropriate when directed from a man to to a woman is often ignored when the roles are reversed.

The double standard certainly exists. Yes, the best of judges (and those who fill their place in other matters) will do their best to ignore such things and simply look at the facts presented but this doesn't alter the fact that the perception of these events varies by gender. When a man beats a woman there is an outrage. When a woman beats a man the common responses are "he probably had it coming" or "LOL"!
 

knight steel

New member
Jul 6, 2009
1,794
0
0
oktalist said:
The two teachers in the OP's example are just as bad as each other IMO. If the majority of people really agree with the double standard described in the OP, then we are pretty fucked as a species.
I agree completely good man (holds up glass) a toast to humanity being fucked up.
Lonan said:
My first problem with you're words is that pedophilia implies being more attracted to the pre-pubescent than the post-pubescent. 13 is during puberty, not pre=pubescent. My issue is it puts a 13 year old in the same category as a 3 year old, which I find insulting as a human being, and as someone who was just as much a human being at 13 as I am now at 20. No changes really, just no more voice cracks and no more acne. So from a mental perspective that was insulting to me, but no worries, I know you didn't mean it, and I don't care.

As for a double standard, it's a trillion times more likely that sex between a 26 year old male a 13 year old female is not consensual than between a 13 year male and a 26 year female. It's not a double standard, it's common sense rooted in reality. It would be just awesome to have sex with an attractive female teacher, but if you were a girl, you probably would want it to be with someone you're age and a more emotional experience and all that jazz. Also, a 13 year old girl's vagina is not fully sized, and it would be very painful for her to have sex with a grown man. It's pretty simple. There's a lot more potential for harm when the larger person is male than if the larger person is female (and potentially and rather likely physically weaker in the latter case)

So I see no double standard.
Pedophilia refers to any one under age also were not talking about the chance of the sex being consensual were talking about the reaction of the public about the sex when it's consensual and how different genders change that reaction and even if it was rape it does not change the double standard that the male pedophile is worse than the female.
 

Miumaru

New member
May 5, 2010
1,765
0
0
Miles Tormani said:
Miumaru said:
He was talking about girls (the poster I responded to)
Ive mentioned male male situation. I would imagine it also worse for a Man/boy than Woman/boy, since the boy is being entered.
So, since this is still all a pretty much hypothetical situation...

And if the adult woman is using a strap-on?
Then it would be worse than a woman and boy vaginally. I very much had such situations in mind.
 

Shirokurou

New member
Mar 8, 2010
1,039
0
0
It's a double standard in our heads. It's from the same opera as "there is not rape of males by females, cause guys always want sex".

But as a lawyer-in-training, I can tell you that legally it has no difference and I've seen cases of both gender go exactly the same way.
 

Miles Tormani

New member
Jul 30, 2008
471
0
0
Miumaru said:
Miles Tormani said:
Miumaru said:
He was talking about girls (the poster I responded to)
Ive mentioned male male situation. I would imagine it also worse for a Man/boy than Woman/boy, since the boy is being entered.
So, since this is still all a pretty much hypothetical situation...

And if the adult woman is using a strap-on?
Then it would be worse than a woman and boy vaginally. I very much had such situations in mind.
Just making sure you're not leaving out the possibility.
 

Samurai Goomba

New member
Oct 7, 2008
3,679
0
0
MasochisticMuse said:
Anyone above the age of 18 still interested in 13-year-olds is sick. Even 18 is pushing it in my opinion.
Not everyone looks his or her age. Physical attraction can be deceitful. I agree with your first statement that chasing 13-15 year olds is bad and wrong for anyone over 18. However, I do not agree with your second statement at all. ANYONE above the age of 18? What about 19? Or 20? Is a relationship between a 19 year old man and 18 year old girl really "pushing it?"

My girlfriend sometimes looks VERY young and innocent, but she's older than me. And I look a fair bit older than I am when I grow my facial hair (always do). Some people might look at us and say, "What's that 30 year-old guy doing with that 15 year-old girl? That's sick." But of course, that would be a stupid conclusion on their part.

I know you meant purely in terms of actual age and not perceived age, but we don't all usually carry our birth certificate. If you're at a club, the IDs you see (assuming you even feel entitled/sober enough to ask for one before dating somebody) can be faked. A lot of the time outside of a school environment, we don't really know what somebody's actual age is, might feel strange asking and have to guess based on his or her appearance. I'm not in ANY WAY trying to excuse genuine pedophilia (which often happens in school anyway, where age IS known), just saying it's not so easy to figure age outside of a public school environment.
 

Sporky111

Digital Wizard
Dec 17, 2008
4,009
0
0
I think it's the same mentality that causes a girl who sleeps with three guys to be considered a slut, while a guy who sleeps with three girls is considered lucky. It doesn't make sense, it's just bias and sexism.
 

garfoldsomeoneelse

Charming, But Stupid
Mar 22, 2009
2,908
0
0
Azaraxzealot said:
sexism, plain and simple, which is why most people take pity on women in court and they win their cases of false rape claims and child custody. we STILL think women need to be protected, if sexism was to be completely eliminated, then everyone would always be treated equally, no matter the circumstance, but of course that will never happen, as humans are a very biased species united by only one thing: hate.

OT: I do not agree with this, older women AND men should be prosecuted all the same.
This, this, this this this. According to a police officer I knew, well over 40% of all rape charges he's investigated have turned up false. In most of those false cases, it was some whore that cheated on her boyfriend and then slapped charges on the other guy when she got caught. Rest of the time, it was some petty, vindictive ***** using law enforcement to get back at her ex.

OT: I was kind of hoping this would be a thread regarding the pedophile witch hunt going on in America. See? Your mind immediately went "why would he care, is he a pedophile?" That's the fucking problem.
 

Mcface

New member
Aug 30, 2009
2,266
0
0
Chances are the 13 year old boy would be "FUCK YEAH" while the 13 year old girl would be scarred for life. At 13 I had a REALLY hot female gym teacher. Everyone in the class stared at her ass the entire time. Seriously, kickboxing class was one of the best times in my school life..ahh.. Anyway, fact is, If that hot ass teacher tried to have sex with me at 13, I would have been all for it, seeing as most 13 year old boys already masturbate.

Girls on the other hand, tend to be much different at that age. Self conscious, unsure, etc etc.

And age can be very fooling these days. I remember seeing this really hot girl walking down the street one day, my buddy went to hit on her. He is 19, im turning 19 in 2 days. She was 14. We felt like setting ourselves on fire.

But it's seriously not our fault, she looked like she could have been older than me. She was about my friends height, and fully developed. She could have easily lied about her age (which ALOT of girls do) and taken him home, had sex with him, and then cried foul. And guess what? he would be in jail.

It's a scary place we live in, before I whip it out, im asking for ID now.
 

MasterChief892039

New member
Jun 28, 2010
631
0
0
Samurai Goomba said:
MasochisticMuse said:
Anyone above the age of 18 still interested in 13-year-olds is sick. Even 18 is pushing it in my opinion.
What about 19? Or 20? Is a relationship between a 19 year old man and 18 year old girl really "pushing it?"
You've misunderstood me. I mean even an 18 year old being interested in a 13 year old is pushing it, not an of-age person dating an 18 year old. I see nothing wrong with an 18 year old dating a 19 year old, in fact in a couple months I will be in that exact situation. One or two years apart is inconsequential.

Samurai Goomba said:
I know you meant purely in terms of actual age and not perceived age, but we don't all usually carry our birth certificate. If you're at a club, the IDs you see (assuming you even feel entitled/sober enough to ask for one before dating somebody) can be faked. A lot of the time outside of a school environment, we don't really know what somebody's actual age is, might feel strange asking and have to guess based on his or her appearance. I'm not in ANY WAY trying to excuse genuine pedophilia (which often happens in school anyway, where age IS known), just saying it's not so easy to figure age outside of a public school environment.
I was speaking purely about actual age. There's nothing wrong with being physically attracted to a 13 year old if s/he looks like s/he's 20, but if you pursue any sort of relationship with that person after finding out their real age (whether physical or emotional), then that's taking advantage of an inexperienced and naive person. I realize some young people have all the physical indicators of a sexually mature adult, but that doesn't mean it's okay to treat a child as a sexually mature adult.

And if a 13 year old looks like a 13 year old, there's simply no excuse.
 

Samurai Goomba

New member
Oct 7, 2008
3,679
0
0
MasochisticMuse said:
I was speaking purely about actual age. There's nothing wrong with being physically attracted to a 13 year old if s/he looks like s/he's 20, but if you pursue any sort of relationship with that person after finding out their real age (whether physical or emotional), then that's taking advantage of an inexperienced and naive person. I realize some young people have all the physical indicators of a sexually mature adult, but that doesn't mean it's okay to treat a child as a sexually mature adult.

And if a 13 year old looks like a 13 year old, there's simply no excuse.
I'm just saying, sometimes 13, 14 and 15 year-olds have been known to sneak into clubs and bars with fake ID, and a lot of guys (if the girl looks old enough) probably aren't going to ask for both her age and a couple forms of identification.

In school, however, and/or when the girl LOOKS her age, no excuse. Also, no excuse for rape at any age.

Edit: I just noticed you said "after finding out her age it would be wrong to pursue a relationship." That's very true, but some people might not find out in time if the girl is good at lying.
 

SPCF

New member
Jun 9, 2010
639
0
0
Well...
As long as they're both WILLING to have the relationships and above a certain age (I think it depends on the country), I honestly don't see a problem with that.
 

conflictofinterests

New member
Apr 6, 2010
1,098
0
0
18 in most of the US. 13 with your new rule. In a sense, all these numbers are fairly arbitrary, but they reflect something basic enough to our perceptions of children that we don't question the arbitrary limits at all. Children, especially prepubescent and pubescent ones, are not the best predictors of consequences, in comparison to people of legal age. To be fair, there are plenty of people over the age of consent that don't show conscientiousness one would expect out of an adult, and there are plenty of people under the age of consent that are more conscientious than the average adult.

Still, the law of the land was made by people who think that one's missteps should be limited to that which one can gage the full consequences of. Age of consent laws are in place because, for the most part, people under the age of consent don't really think about the consequences of sex, and, for the most part, people over the age of consent do.

As far as pedophilia and statutory rape cases go, the male sex drive is both notorious and encouraged in this society, whereas the female sex drive is generally ignored and discouraged. The boy having sex with an older woman is "probably less likely that she lied or coerced him into it" than the girl having sex with an older man because a) the boy must have wanted it b) "If I were in his place, I would have wanted it" c) Girls don't want to have sex, so she must have been forced or lied to d) She would have to have been a slut to have sex with a guy that much older than her.
 

LadyRhian

New member
May 13, 2010
1,246
0
0
Lonan said:
It would be just awesome to have sex with an attractive female teacher, but if you were a girl, you probably would want it to be with someone you're age and a more emotional experience and all that jazz.
Speaking as someone who hasn't been 13 in 30 years... why would I want to do it with someone my own age, who knows as little about sex as I do and who will probably hurt me through lack of experience. When I was 13, I was crushing on Richard Chamberlain in "Shogun" (Angin-samma), not the boy the next seat over. Admittedly, this may be more due to the fact that he was always miming the motions and noise of masturbating at everyone he disliked. But there were no real suave and/or studly guys in my class, either At 13 boys still have acne and their voices are changing. Older men are much more fascinating. When I finally got to high school, I was absurdly attracted to a teacher's aide with a malformed hand, who was in his late 20's or early 30's.

To all the people who are claiming that the male being older is more frowned upon because it's worse to be penetrated- no, that's not it. It's abuse, pure and simple. Kids of that age are not able to give informed consent- by law. So it doesn't matter who is older, it's abuse no matter who is doing it. Female on female sexual abuse is just as damaging, mentally, as female on male, male on male and so on. You may not hear about it as often, but it does occur. And how will a young man feel if the "older woman" is his mom, or older sister? All of that happens, too.

Adults and older people have power over kids. Kids know the adults know more and tend to listen to them and go along with what they say, especially if the adult has other sorts of power over the child- being in a mentor or supervisory position over said child, like that of a teacher, Principal of a School, Babysitter- part of it is an abuse of the adult's power over the child, and the rest is that the child isn't ready to make such decisions as to engage in sex. They may think and feel themselves ready, but they are not. They may feel impelled by their own hormones, peer pressure, guilt, or other pressure, to have sex with the adult.

I have a friend who had sex with his sixteen-year old babysitter when he was twelve. At the time, he felt she had done him a favor. Now, he says, he's been around the block so many times, he can give guided tours. And he's not so sanguine about what she did. Because of her, he was introduced to sex too early, and he did lots of things to have sex that he regrets now.
 

Bane_Star

New member
Dec 4, 2008
98
0
0
Men have a Average Healthy Once a day passion for sex, from the time they are around 13 til 30. (After that its usually just habit & lifestyle)

Thats only 17 years of desire.. And Society says its wrong for them to engage in sex for the first 5 years of this? almost a Third???

Womens passion for sex doesn't START until she is 33, before this its all emotional desire and feelings (for the majority) They peak for a few final years in an attempt to get once last pregnancy, before menopause.

Hence Cougartown etc..

Most guys at 13 would LOVE to get laid, and fathers would cheer their sons on..

Most girls at 13 don't even THINK about having sex (or society perceives this to be true), and their parents would be mortified if anything was happening..

Given the situation, of course a double standard is going to happen.
 

Foolishman1776

New member
Jul 4, 2009
198
0
0
This is doubly odd considering the fact that an older male, younger female coupling is more likely to produce healthy offspring, as long as the female is capable of healthily bearing a child. Is it necessarily moral or proper for such a thing to happen? I can't really say.

Bane_Star said:
Men have a Average Healthy Once a day passion for sex, from the time they are around 13 til 30. (After that its usually just habit & lifestyle)

Thats only 17 years of desire.. And Society says its wrong for them to engage in sex for the first 5 years of this? almost a Third???

Womens passion for sex doesn't START until she is 33, before this its all emotional desire and feelings (for the majority) They peak for a few final years in an attempt to get once last pregnancy, before menopause.

Hence Cougartown etc..

Most guys at 13 would LOVE to get laid, and fathers would cheer their sons on..

Most girls at 13 don't even THINK about having sex (or society perceives this to be true), and their parents would be mortified if anything was happening..

Given the situation, of course a double standard is going to happen.
I don't disbelieve you, but given that this goes against what I have learned, and my personal experience, I would like to ask for some citation.