The reason most quote is to get the attention of the person quoted, myself included. It's rarely about the people reading the thread and more about keeping a discussion going. I love that, since most don't return to a thread and it promotes discussion. I would be long gone without the quote feature. The snip part is actually technically breaking the rules, but only if it happens repeatedly and to an extreme, and it's hard to enforce. Some of the posts in this thread are punishable, but I'll be nice given the circumstance.geK0 said:Who else agrees?
I understand why somebody would use it when they are referring to an older post, but I see so many people quoting the post immediately before theirs, because obviously the average person doesn't know how to look up.
other things that annoy me are quotes within quotes, and people who don't remove pictures and videos from quotes, and people who quote a wall of text and refer to a specific sentence without pointing out which sentence they are referring to! seriously! snip your quotes!!!
I'm all for being clear about who you're replying to, but why not use an "@User" format rather than filling the page with things that have already been posted.
/rant
Just seeing whether I am alone in being anhappens noyed by this = \
OhaigeK0 said:Who else agrees?
I understand why somebody would use it when they are referring to an older post, but I see so many people quoting the post immediately before theirs, because obviously the average person doesn't know how to look up.
other things that annoy me are quotes within quotes, and people who don't remove pictures and videos from quotes, and people who quote a wall of text and refer to a specific sentence without pointing out which sentence they are referring to! seriously! snip your quotes!!!
I'm all for being clear about who you're replying to, but why not use an "@User" format rather than filling the page with things that have already been posted.
/rant
Just seeing whether I am alone in being annoyed by this = \
The snip works better if you use a spoiler tag like I've done here. That way people can still read the commentTheLoneBeet said:Despite I do it sometimes, it bothers me when people "snip" a post their quoting. Yes it saves space but it removes any context for those who didn't read the post that's being quoted.Wuggy said:snip.zehydra said:snip.geK0 said:snip.
I don't think it's done too often, if there was a "too often" for quoting then I'm sure it'd have some kind of cool-down like a really powerful attack in a game.
Earlier this month, I was lurking after watching a Zero punctuation video and figured I might as well make an account.Tasachan said:BROTHER! Since when do you post here?!
The quote feature has a massive advantage over the '@' style, namely that it sends a PM directly to the quoted person alerting them that someone is talking specifically to them, whereas the '@' style doesn't. That alone is worth the hassle for me. Not that I see quotes as a hassle. If you do, then you're more than welcome to not use them yourself, but the fact remains (whether you like it or not) that it's useful, convenient, and most people are completely unbothered by it whatsoever.geK0 said:Who else agrees?
I understand why somebody would use it when they are referring to an older post, but I see so many people quoting the post immediately before theirs, because obviously the average person doesn't know how to look up.
other things that annoy me are quotes within quotes, and people who don't remove pictures and videos from quotes, and people who quote a wall of text and refer to a specific sentence without pointing out which sentence they are referring to! seriously! snip your quotes!!!
I'm all for being clear about who you're replying to, but why not use an "@User" format rather than filling the page with things that have already been posted.
/rant
Just seeing whether I am alone in being annoyed by this = \
How about like this then?Trivun said:
Fair enough, I can't argue with that. The issue I have is merely that you seem to be dismissive of quotes entirely, rather than simply snipping the text. I tend to snip only when there's a massive conversation going on, or when a post is particularly long. Short and sweet ones, like your post that I'm now quoting, I'll keep intact so that others who are interested in our forum discussion can read it without any hassle or needless clicking of names to see earlier posts...geK0 said:How about like this then?Trivun said:
if your post had already been swept away by other posts I would include the specific sentences I was referring to, but since you are less than 3 posts up, it seems to me that it would be redundant to include your entire post (especially without removing the quote of myself).
doing it this way just seems a lot cleaner to me.
I saw we were turning this thread into quote madness and wanted to be part of it. Oh yeah, I'm a bad guy. Chicks dig that I hear.geK0 said:snip
So then what's the problem with quotes if you can just hide the rambling behind spoilers.TacticalAssassin1 said:it's done like thisOrokuSaki said:snip
hello!
Now quote me and see what I typed
It's spoiler and /spoiler in brackets
OrokuSaki said:So then what's the problem with quotes if you can just hide the rambling behind spoilers.TacticalAssassin1 said:it's done like thisOrokuSaki said:snip
hello!
Now quote me and see what I typed
It's spoiler and /spoiler in brackets
Testing
Ironically, every time you've replied to someone, you've done what makes you mad and quoted them. You gotta admit, it's a lot better than just going "@geK0" before your post. I do agree that you should snip your posts so that they aren't quotes within quotes within quotes making a huge massive wall of quotes, and you should snip out anything that is irrelevant to what you are replying to (I removed Trivun's snipped quote for instance, when I quoted you), but quotes are kind of necessary, and it really helps a discussion if I leave a section of your post in that I'm referring to, even if it's the OP. I think you can turn notifications for quotes off if it really bothers you, and if you don't want the notifications off, then I guess you really have nothing to complain about.geK0 said:How about like this then?
if your post had already been swept away by other posts I would include the specific sentences I was referring to, but since you are less than 3 posts up, it seems to me that it would be redundant to include your entire post (especially without removing the quote of myself).
doing it this way just seems a lot cleaner to me.
You misunderstood, I mean "no quotes ever" I meant "quotes only when necessary, and keep them short."thedeathscythe said:
Actually this is true, I am part of a very small forum, we used to be a huuuuuge forum, smaller than the escapist but very large. Stuff happened and eventually the users just left and now there's maybe a max of 10 users, there's probably about 5 of us that are still pretty active, and since it's a smaller environment, we use the @User format as well. That being said, I think the Escapist is just too big for that to be handy, at least when thread sometimes go for 7 pages and such.geK0 said:In most forums I use the @User format, but I use a blank quote (except when the post I'm quoting is already buried) on these forums because of the notification feature.thedeathscythe said: