The quote feature is there to be used, what would be the point of having it if you don't use it when its appropriate/convenient? Though I do agree that if you use them you should cut out images etc.
@TheIronRuler, the giraffe actually only had tree legs, that's why it couldn't do a handstand.NuclearPenguin said:..Youtube system no one knowing who replied? What?Mr.K. said:I say change it to the youtube systems so noone knows who replied to what, because isolated posts really are the best way to discuss topics.
Yes that was actually sarcasm
That only works if you're talking to people who are happy to sit in one thread and hit refresh occasionally. Some people (myself included) don't stay in one forum for any real length of time, so an @[user]Grouchy Imp[/user] in a later post will not attract my attention as I'll be on my soapbox in another thread by then, but a 'quoted' message in my inbox alerts me that I need to go back and perhaps defend a previous assertion.geK0 said:I'm all for being clear about who you're replying to, but why not use an "@User" format rather than filling the page with things that have already been posted.
I agree with the stuff that I put in italics, but I don't agree at all with the part I bolded. Yes, people can look up, but we'll assume they're replying to the OP if nothing indicates otherwise. Yeah, you could just use their name, at least as long as they haven't posted several replies, but why do that when the quote feature allows you to quote their exact words so that people can see both what you're saying and what you're replying to?geK0 said:I understand why somebody would use it when they are referring to an older post, but I see so many people quoting the post immediately before theirs, because obviously the average person doesn't know how to look up.
other things that annoy me are quotes within quotes, and people who don't remove pictures and videos from quotes, and people who quote a wall of text and refer to a specific sentence without pointing out which sentence they are referring to! seriously! snip your quotes!!!
I'm all for being clear about who you're replying to, but why not use an "@User" format rather than filling the page with things that have already been posted.
I have a present for you.Wuggy said:I actually get excited when I see the "1 New Message" thing, especially during workdays.
Has it really got to the point where we're complaining about this?geK0 said:Who else agrees?
I understand why somebody would use it when they are referring to an older post, but I see so many people quoting the post immediately before theirs, because obviously the average person doesn't know how to look up.
other things that annoy me are quotes within quotes, and people who don't remove pictures and videos from quotes, and people who quote a wall of text and refer to a specific sentence without pointing out which sentence they are referring to! seriously! snip your quotes!!!
I'm all for being clear about who you're replying to, but why not use an "@User" format rather than filling the page with things that have already been posted.
/rant
Just seeing whether I am alone in being annoyed by this = \
It was inevitable. I knew this thread was going to be quoting the OP before I even clicked.Sparrow said:Currently finding it hilarious that this thread is full of more quotes than most average topics.
On topic, I'm completely alright with quotes. Sometimes chain quotes can get messy, but most people on the site clear a quote up whenever it gets out of hand.
The post above your post when viewing all comments.Mr.K. said:@TheIronRuler, the giraffe actually only had tree legs, that's why it couldn't do a handstand.NuclearPenguin said:..Youtube system no one knowing who replied? What?Mr.K. said:I say change it to the youtube systems so noone knows who replied to what, because isolated posts really are the best way to discuss topics.
Yes that was actually sarcasm
Care to take a guess what post I replied to?
I totally agree to that! High five!Pinkamena said:I love quotes! Then I know when people are talking to me.
In view all comments the comments come below the people that they are replying to.Yopaz said:Oh yeah. I agree so much with this. I have no problem with anyone quoting me, or someone quoting others, I often happen to miss certain posts and see the post being quoted on the page I am currently on may open my eyes to the fact that the post is even there. However, if there's one post EVERYONE will read it is the first post. You don't go into a topic and just answer whatever you feel like. You read the post that opens the thread, make up an opinion on what to reply with according to this. There's no need to fucking quote it! We all read it. This is of course unless they quote small parts of it to actually debate a single point of the OP, but in general, yeah. Don't quote OP.zehydra said:The only quote thing that bothers me is when a user quotes the OP. Reading an entire Thread conversation before posting can be tedious.geK0 said:Who else agrees?
I understand why somebody would use it when they are referring to an older post, but I see so many people quoting the post immediately before theirs, because obviously the average person doesn't know how to look up.
other things that annoy me are quotes within quotes, and people who don't remove pictures and videos from quotes, and people who quote a wall of text and refer to a specific sentence without pointing out which sentence they are referring to! seriously! snip your quotes!!!
I'm all for being clear about who you're replying to, but why not use an "@User" format rather than filling the page with things that have already been posted.
/rant
Just seeing whether I am alone in being annoyed by this = \
Whenever someone quotes me I think of that as a good reason to keep the discussion rolling since I don't really have time to watch every thread I've ever participated in.
Actually the OP is more likely to check if his thread got any replies and doesn't need to be notified because in a way every post is a reply to him/her.Mad World said:I could see why quoting the OP could seem annoying, but the same applies here, too. By quoting the OP, you send him/her a message which notifies him/her that someone was quoting. And that could be useful (for the OP, in this case) in order to know who to respond to.
All you get is a list of 10 comments or so where a lot of random users are arguing about something that was said 4-5 pages back and you can't know what that post said without actively looking for the post in question. Even if you find it there's no way of knowing if you find the correct post, or a different post by the same user. That's what he meant with his post. You see who replied, you just don't see what he replied to. I liked it the way it was before when the comments that was a reply to other comments were placed under the one they replied to, but Youtube has had several stupid changes the last few years...NuclearPenguin said:..Youtube system no one knowing who replied? What?Mr.K. said:I say change it to the youtube systems so noone knows who replied to what, because isolated posts really are the best way to discuss topics.
Yes that was actually sarcasm