While I disagree with the notion of calling the police to deal with an unruly 10 year old who won't shower, I have to admit that I feel the officer's use of the taser was justified.
The child was combative, non-compliant, and verbally abusive. The officer also stated that he feared he could have injured her by forcing her into cuffs (possibly breaking a limb), so the taser was the best viable alternative. I would rather be tazed than break a limb. The pain of a taser vanishes in an instant, but the pain of a broken limb lasts for months and can be debilitating.
It's a freak'n
taser! Yes, they inflict pain, but they are generally harmless and only used to force compliance. I have been tazed several times, and it is both
TERRIFYING and
painful, but it is over almost instantaneously. Very few people are actually harmed by tasers. The amperage they deliver is
very low, and it is pulsed every milisecond or so.
I also feel that I should point out that many tasers used by police can be used without actually firing any projectiles at the target. They have a, "Drive stun," ability. This means that you can simply touch the target with the tip of the weapon and zap them with a single trigger press. This is the alternative to firing the hooks and having the target endure the customary 5 second pre-programed pulse. However, the article does not state which Taser International model was used.
Chances are she was either hit with an M26 or an X26
http://www.taser.com/products/law/Pages/TASERM26.aspx
http://www.taser.com/products/law/Pages/TASERX26.aspx
My point is, this girl will be fine. She likely learned a lesson and will probably think twice before going on a rampage and disobeying her mother again. If she has a mood/personality disorder that causes her to behave the way she did, then it is her mother's duty to get her help from this point on.