DraftPickle said:
Right so I'll say that the Lib Dems do deserve another chance at running the country once their party gets a stronger presence. I don't want to see the Tories in power because, if they are elected they will benefit only a small section of society, this then creates the ole shitness of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. They support this undisciplined type of banking that got us in this shit heap in the first place, we need institution like FSA to keep the banks in check. They believe in a mentality that everyone has a fair a chance of becoming successful and rich, this overly optimisitc view purely created through theory, in practise the reality is very different people do not all have even chances. Some MP's son has more of a chance in getting a influencing position in politics than I am and thats the thr brutal truth. All of what I have said can also be mirrored in our countries history. Write back if you want me to continue?
Uh. No. Not quite. The Tory Party Policy and direction is pretty much exactly the same as labours. I think you're acting upon stereotypes of the Tories, rather than actual fact. You know how I know this? I've spent the past month researching party policy, old and new, for the two main parties (And a little lib dem and fringe.). When it comes down to it, the two main parties occupy the same about-centre point on the political compass.
Conservatism
traditionally follows the ideals that you describe, but Cameron is taking the party in a new, more central direction, seeking to push labour off the middle ground back to the socialist stance it once occupied.