Actually the issue as I've read it is that there are alternate costumes availible for Chell that can be purchused for an additional fee. This is very similar to Capcom selling alternative costumes for characters in games like Street Fighter. I get that you think it's no big deal, but a lot of people do think that this kind of thing is ruining gaming for a number of reasons. To the way of thinking of many people it's the trivial nature of the DLC that annoys people as much as anything.Bags159 said:Including cosmetic hats is not grounds for dismissal as a GOTY contender. The only reason P2 has such low ratings on metacritic is because people freaked out over hats. That do nothing. That aren't necessary to enjoy the game. I'm not sure how I'm in denial about anything because I don't see a cosmetic hat shop as the end of the world. Pardon me for taking, "lol portal 2 too short = 0 / 10" "OHEMGEE DAY 1 "DLC" 0 / 10" reviews with a grain of salt. Which is what almost every negative review on metacritc was, last I checked.Therumancer said:Actually that's incorrect. /v/ has been around a long time, and doesn't have that kind of power. This is a point a lot of people are missing. The only thing that is going to have a visible influance on ratings is a lot of dissatisfied customers. I understand a lot of people are in denial about this, but it's not really a point that can be argued. Yes, the rating went back up, but that could simply be a more successful attempt at damage control than what Bioware did. Any way it goes, your still dealing with a situation where the rating is less than perfect, and definatly not GoTY caliber.Bags159 said:Portal didn't have day 1 dlc; it had a day 1 hat shop. The only reason the score is below a 9 on metacritic is because /v/ bombed the score on day one.Therumancer said:Well, GoTY nominations tend to be bought not earned so it's hard to say.
2011 was supposed to be a huge year for Blockbuster games, and EA in paticular has been flooding the market. It hasn't turned out that way though, and truthfully a lot of these blockbusters seem to be fizzling down to pretty run of the mill successes, if that (sales aside). "Dragon Age 2" was badly received, and despite the fanboyism I honestly do not think that "Portal 2" has had rating difficulties simply due to Day1 DLC, largely because even when it's inspire anger it hasn't lead to that kind of reaction.
Just setting the record straight.
OT: I imagine Portal 2 will be GOTY. It's probably going to be mine, anyway.
It's fine by me if you like the game, and really I'm not hating on it (which a lot of people seem to think) I'm simply commenting on how so many people seem to be in denial about it, and being realistic in my "calls" on what is likely to get game of the year. I honestly do not think it's likely to be "Portal 2" even if a lot of people really like the game. But then again I don't think any of the games released so far this year have been blockbusters on the nessicary level, so it's not like I'm selectively picking on "Portal 2".
Also, Portal 2 doesn't have much competition this year, IMO. I mean, Oblivion was fun, but the quality is a lot lower than Portal 1 and or 2. I doubt Skyrim will be much of a leap forward in quality, if Fallout is any indication. Mass Effect 3? People hate large numbers.
You can only buy hats, gestures, and skins for the bots. Which are completely optional. Some of which can be unlocked through achievements and playing the game. The skins/hats are only visible to you when gesturing.Therumancer said:Actually the issue as I've read it is that there are alternate costumes availible for Chell that can be purchused for an additional fee. This is very similar to Capcom selling alternative costumes for characters in games like Street Fighter. I get that you think it's no big deal, but a lot of people do think that this kind of thing is ruining gaming for a number of reasons. To the way of thinking of many people it's the trivial nature of the DLC that annoys people as much as anything.Bags159 said:Including cosmetic hats is not grounds for dismissal as a GOTY contender. The only reason P2 has such low ratings on metacritic is because people freaked out over hats. That do nothing. That aren't necessary to enjoy the game. I'm not sure how I'm in denial about anything because I don't see a cosmetic hat shop as the end of the world. Pardon me for taking, "lol portal 2 too short = 0 / 10" "OHEMGEE DAY 1 "DLC" 0 / 10" reviews with a grain of salt. Which is what almost every negative review on metacritc was, last I checked.Therumancer said:Actually that's incorrect. /v/ has been around a long time, and doesn't have that kind of power. This is a point a lot of people are missing. The only thing that is going to have a visible influance on ratings is a lot of dissatisfied customers. I understand a lot of people are in denial about this, but it's not really a point that can be argued. Yes, the rating went back up, but that could simply be a more successful attempt at damage control than what Bioware did. Any way it goes, your still dealing with a situation where the rating is less than perfect, and definatly not GoTY caliber.Bags159 said:Portal didn't have day 1 dlc; it had a day 1 hat shop. The only reason the score is below a 9 on metacritic is because /v/ bombed the score on day one.Therumancer said:Well, GoTY nominations tend to be bought not earned so it's hard to say.
2011 was supposed to be a huge year for Blockbuster games, and EA in paticular has been flooding the market. It hasn't turned out that way though, and truthfully a lot of these blockbusters seem to be fizzling down to pretty run of the mill successes, if that (sales aside). "Dragon Age 2" was badly received, and despite the fanboyism I honestly do not think that "Portal 2" has had rating difficulties simply due to Day1 DLC, largely because even when it's inspire anger it hasn't lead to that kind of reaction.
Just setting the record straight.
OT: I imagine Portal 2 will be GOTY. It's probably going to be mine, anyway.
It's fine by me if you like the game, and really I'm not hating on it (which a lot of people seem to think) I'm simply commenting on how so many people seem to be in denial about it, and being realistic in my "calls" on what is likely to get game of the year. I honestly do not think it's likely to be "Portal 2" even if a lot of people really like the game. But then again I don't think any of the games released so far this year have been blockbusters on the nessicary level, so it's not like I'm selectively picking on "Portal 2".
Also, Portal 2 doesn't have much competition this year, IMO. I mean, Oblivion was fun, but the quality is a lot lower than Portal 1 and or 2. I doubt Skyrim will be much of a leap forward in quality, if Fallout is any indication. Mass Effect 3? People hate large numbers.
I mean it's fine to say you disagree with people, but to say that they have no right to rate a game based on something like this that pissed them off is wrong, the whole point is to try and send a message to the company(s) doing it. That said, I don't think that this alone was the sole reason for complaints.
See, the thing is that if your a fanboy, and really like "Portal 2" then obviously your going to disagree with anyone who has any complaint, no matter what aspect of things it's over. That right there is part of the problem, and what makes this kind of thing so nasty, especially when your looking at a divide substantial enough to lower the ratings of a very popular game in a noticible way.
Brink. I think. Not sure, it is way too early to tell.drummodino said:Ok I know it's very early to be asking this but I was curious to what you guys/girls think... What game do you think will take the prize home for this year? Personally I'm thinking either Portal 2 or if it's released in time Minecraft. Mass Effect 3 and Uncharted 3 could potentially change my mind though.
Also making the poll I realized how many sequels are in the list... Is this good or bad for the industry?
EDIT: Sorry I forgot about Skyrim :S