But it could be an economic boom in what, if current economic trends indicate, would be near the begining of a new recession. Also OLYMPIC FEVOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111jpoon said:You should have the option, "I don't really give a rats ass!" because that would have been my vote. America has a lot more important shit to worry about than this. This has distraction written all over it.
As someone who lives in Vancouver, I really think you should give this further consideration.Radeonx said:Chicago, because I'm from there. And it would be interesting.
woo! others from Chicago!Radeonx said:Chicago, because I'm from there. And it would be interesting.
It's Canada is the only answer I will provide.JRCB said:Where's the "Wooo Vancouver 2010!" option?
Interesting, as this is not a national event like the World Cup, it is a city based bid. So Chicago has never had it. The US has had 3 cities host 4 Olympics over the last 112 years.EchetusXe said:America has had it loaaaaaaaaaads of times, it was at Barcelona once, so I say give the Brazilians a crack.
Well Chicago has it now. It isn't that bad because the US spreads it around its cities. Will be Chicago's maiden games.CK76 said:Interesting, as this is not a national event like the World Cup, it is a city based bid. So Chicago has never had it. The US has had 3 cities host 4 Olympics over the last 112 years.EchetusXe said:America has had it loaaaaaaaaaads of times, it was at Barcelona once, so I say give the Brazilians a crack.
1904 - Saint Louis, Missouri
1932 - Los Angeles, California
1984 - Los Angeles, California
1996 - Atlanta, Georgia
So, should Chicago be penalized by Atlanta or Los Angeles?
I do think Rio will get it, but Chicago have a strong bid.
Ugh, the traffic!. It's bad enough as it is, I can't imagine how the Olympics is going to help.George144 said:I'm going with the WOOOOOO London has it in 2012 suck it other countries. Who knows I might even go see the Olympics, oh and fleece tourists. Woooo tourist fleecing.