No, it is not justified. They ban all forms of headwear, from hoods to earmuffs to freaking ushankas. It doesn't matter whether it's gang-affiliated or not. My hat is definitely not, never has and most likely never will be. I would understand if they banned bandannas - Crips and Bloods and all that. But no. It's all headwear. Nobody's going to get gunned down for wearing a fedora.Flos said:You're angry because the school has banned what it deems inappropriate clothing.
Well, that's justified. In some places gangs are a huge goddamn issue and you can get assaulted for wearing the wrong thing. I know this from personal experience. It's not a baseless rule. Just be happy they're not enforcing uniforms. A student at one of the schools in my former state was gunned down for wearing the wrong thing.
The loiter/lunch thing is completely justifiable, too. They could have had issues with students selling drugs or tagging walls while the staff couldn't watch. Your little friends have issues keeping their paint on paper, suddenly you're not allowed in the hallway anymore.
As for the police box, what's wrong with that? Students have the opportunity to be completely anonymous while reporting someone breaking the law? That's great. It could help anything from harassment to thievery to assault. I don't see anything wrong with something that could make the school a safer place to be.
It really is amazing to read how someone could be such a child about such inane things.
ORLY? If students are selling drugs, keeping them out of the halls will not by any means solve the problem. There is no reason why it ever should, when they can go into the bathroom stalls (which I've seen happen today) or off school property. And I seriously doubt tagging is a problem, and if it is, they can still tag other places, so keeping them out of the halls will not solve the issue.
I don't think there's anything wrong with the police box in itself, but I felt appalled that it was deemed necessary.