Gorgeous, beautiful, simply the mostest stunningly structured post ever; you simply must post me.Sober Thal said:I second this.DanielBrown said:They're purely entertainment from my point of view. I don't get why people gotta label it as art just to defend that they still play games.
... and let the flame wars begin.
If we want to go around and call everything art, then what's the point?
dathwampeer said:So you don't mind someone deciding on laws but you do mind someone deciding what should be censored? Arent laws just behavioural censors? Im not promoting murder or anything else morally wrong. Getting off topic but I believe people wouldn't go round murdering if it was made legal, just like people still take drugs despite the law. Laws punish certain behaviour, and no-one should have the right to determine what behaviour is deemed acceptable, just as you, and many others, believe that no-one should have the authority to censor media.Sober Thal said:I do get the hypocrisy of what I'm saying. There are plenty of things I would love to ban. But when you open that gate, even a little. Who can you trust to close it again?
I think they were being sarcstic.Sober Thal said:By post me, you mean quote me, right?Quesa said:Gorgeous, beautiful, simply the mostest stunningly structured post ever; you simply must post me.Sober Thal said:I second this.DanielBrown said:They're purely entertainment from my point of view. I don't get why people gotta label it as art just to defend that they still play games.
... and let the flame wars begin.
If we want to go around and call everything art, then what's the point?
Okay, I did. Now what?
You'd sacrifice essential human rights just so you don't have to see offensive stuff?Sober Thal said:I get what you are saying. I guess all I can tell you is 'Keep fighting the good fight'?
How do you feel about rape simulators? Or a mini game leading Jewish people into ovens?
I say ban that shit, but we all are entitled to our opinions.