I think I was with my fella for like 7 months before we felt the time was right. We split up a couple months later :/
So umm...that ship has long been sailing.
So umm...that ship has long been sailing.
Win...Kinda with you on that one. Personally, I think if she wants it, you want it, you have protection and you love each other, then go for it.GrandAdmiral said:Does having a completely and utterly pessimistic view on my chances of FINDING someone (0%) let alone having sex with them (-?%) count as planned abstinence?
Grand Admiral
The term Nymphomania, does specifically apply to women, and satyriasis to males, based upon their respective root words. Both are listed as disorders in the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), and they remain a part of ICD-10 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems), each listed as a subtype of Hypersexuality.solidstatemind said:There is plenty of justification for both sides of the equation, so if you are an oversexed nymphomaniac (and yes, the term actually is gender-neutral, although most people immediately associate it with females) or a closet puritan (not that you'd admit it here), you are entirely correct in your opinion.
Bah, guilt and regret are sides of the coin you yourself carry in your pocket. You can't feel em unless you choose it. If you do something you weren't ready for, pull the coin and start flipping it.solidstatemind said:Why? The old "self-fulfilling prophecy" saw. Basically if you're not comfortable with having sex before marriage, and you do it anyway, you're going to feel a shit-ton of guilt and regret. If you're of a more sexual bent and you abstain until you're married, you're going to feel a whole lot of resentment and regret that you wasted so much time you could've been knocking boots.
Believe me it doesn't always happen like that. All things considered, the taboo of both extramaritals and divorce are both fading heavily. Sexual compatability is one of those secrets to a healthy and stable relationship, running hand in hand with things like: Trust, Love, and attraction. Denying that, is denying yourself true pleasure.solidstatemind said:The tragedy of the situation is, as ExodusInFlames mentioned albeit in a slightly different light, people make the decision based upon external influences, and end up unhappy. The truth? If you and your future wife are both abstinent, but you really are both emotionally and physically extremely attracted to one another, yeah on your wedding night it will only last 15 clumsy seconds, but that is going to be 15 seconds of the hottest, wettest, most fulfilling sex you will ever have, just because you both are so invested into it.
The first time yes, turrible. Everyone's first time would be, and no one should want that awful embarassing crap on their wedding night. Every male wants to be a bloody super hero, and every gal wants to make her man so happy he'll never leave. Though I have made amateur stuffs, I resent the fact that ... oh you weren't referring directly to me.solidstatemind said:So don't give me the 'practice makes perfect' bullshit-- the first time is *always* going to be awkward, even if you've spent years wanking ov-- I mean reading the Kama Sutra. I still remember my first time, and yeah, it was awkward, but damn, if we weren't hot for one another. I won't brag, but I will say that my # of sexual partners > my age, and if there is one thing I've learned, it's that the only thing you should focus on is the attraction (and hopefully connection) with your prospective partner, because otherwise you're just a bit actor in an amateur porno.
Awesome. Stay stalwart in your beliefs. Just don't get zealous about it.hippykiller said:well im a Catholic and my PERSONAL belief for myself is to stay pure of body until the one you have sworn the rest of your life to is ready to "do it". and i would really truly appreciate it if no one argued with me about the catholic church or my PERSONAL beliefs.
And the longer you have to wait the further away you get from "if she wants to then i'll agree" (staying abstinent that is) :-DIdealistCommi said:If she wants to, then I'll agree. Then again, I'm currently alone, so first I have to get the girl before I think of that.
>:3 Can it be a joint suit? *whines*latenightapplepie said:I'm 19, sue me for more!Wardog13 said:Im 14 sue me!Syndef said:This is a ploy to find out who's still a virgin!
ExodusinFlames said:The term Nymphomania, does specifically apply to women, and satyriasis to males, based upon their respective root words. Both are listed as disorders in the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), and they remain a part of ICD-10 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems), each listed as a subtype of Hypersexuality.solidstatemind said:There is plenty of justification for both sides of the equation, so if you are an oversexed nymphomaniac (and yes, the term actually is gender-neutral, although most people immediately associate it with females) or a closet puritan (not that you'd admit it here), you are entirely correct in your opinion.
Nice clinical(ness? ;3) there man. Good job.