Poll: Asperger Syndrome [please vote, even if you don't know what it is]

Recommended Videos

aaron552

New member
Jun 11, 2008
193
0
0
Isn't it Asperger's Syndrome? Not Asperger Syndrome...
Sorry, just being pedantic, as usual...
 

Bagaloo

New member
Sep 17, 2008
788
0
0
sooperg said:
but it's true. just because we're different doesn't mean people need to treat us as such.
I'm gonna have to disagree here.
Yeah, we do need to treat you different, as we need to be more leniant / patient with you, because it affects how you express yourself.

There certainly are a number of supposed AS sufferers on this site, but then again this is the internet; where else would all the socially awkward people go.

Though I very much doubt that everyone who voted that they have it actually do because I'm convinced that some people would and do use AS as a method of getting attention / special treatment.
 

FinalGamer

New member
Mar 8, 2009
966
0
0
tthor said:
oktalist said:
tthor said:
If any of you believe you may have Asperger syndrome
Where's the poll option for "I believe I'm an Aspie but haven't bothered getting officially diagnosed"? 'Cause that's me.
Would help get an idea of those who officially have Asperger's and those who believe they have it. A lot of people out there unfortunately are using Asperger's as an excuse for the fact they're antisocial pricks and give those with Asperger's a bad name.

I was diagnosed with it at 2 by the way.
 

GothmogII

Possessor Of Hats
Apr 6, 2008
2,215
0
0
Seldon2639 said:
Florion said:
Seldon2639 said:
Full stop. "Treat them and their weaknesses the way you would treat any other person with any weakness. You work around it". That's a fine attitude for you to have, and as a personal choice, that's fine. But it's a rather silly normative judgement to believe that *everyone* should make that same choice. If I don't want to spend time with people who don't "get it", aside from a phony morality that we should have a smile and flower for all the perfect little snowflakes, there's no reason for me to change.

News flash, not everyone is equal. Not everyone is special, or has a gift that makes up for their flaws. If someone is brilliant enough to make up for deficiencies in other areas, I might accept them, and society might accept them, but save for something exceptional to overcome their natural flaws, there's no reason not to shun them. People use asperger's as an excuse for being more flawed with less culpability than other people, and that's crap.
(just being picky here: I'm not sure what grammar you were trying to correct, and also, the period at the end of the quotation should go inside the quote marks.)

I don't care if you don't want to change some personal belief in shunning people (in general) who don't have a shining gift; it just bothers me that you appear to think people with autism deserve to be shunned until they can prove they have something meaningful. Don't most people operate based on "Treat people with respect until they reveal some character flaw you can't respect?" Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "being more flawed with less culpability than other people."
(That wasn't a grammatical correction, more an exclamation. And we can argue the correct placement of the period until the end of time. It's a very old argument; in what I've learned (a la William Saffire and William F. Buckley) is that it goes inside the quotations if it is the end of a sentence unto itself. If it's a fragment, the period goes outside).

Well, that's a fine mindset for you to have, but I don't share it. Yes, if someone is in any way disadvantaged (mentally, physically, or in terms of personality), they need to prove that they have something to make up for it. Beyond that, everyone should be treated differently based on what meaningful qualities they have. Call me meanspirited, but I operate from "treat people with indifference (in a I-won't-make-fun-of-you-but-don't-want-to-spend-time-with-you-or-accept-you kind of way) until they prove they have something to bring to humanity".

A normal person only has to prove they can make some contribution. An abnormal person has to prove that he can make an even greater contribution to make up for the cost of accommodating that abnormality. The "being more flawed with less culpability" thing was that it becomes an excuse for behavior which would be otherwise unacceptable in a person, and that's the opposite of what should happen. A person with a flaw should have to be even better, rather than allowed to be worse.
I'm trying to see where you're coming from...but all I'm getting is an educated bigot vibe, and don't take that as a slight against you personally if you can, it's just how I'm reading your comments.

So, you're saying that, based on the fact that people with disabilities mental or physical or personality wise. That, not only do they have to work to a standard by which they can interact normally with society. But that they have to work above and beyond that because...what?

Let's try it this way:

Bill is deaf.
Bob is fully hearing.
Bill needs an interpreter.
Bill and Bob work in an office doing spreadsheets.
Both do excellent work and are paid the same wages.
Bill needs to work that much harder because he is a burden on his company through his need of an interpreter. Despite that the quality of his work is basically the same as Bob's.

Yeah...what a lovely world you live in.

You're right. People with disabilities do have to work a little harder, but not in the way you're imagining. Just so, as I've mentioned several times in this very thread, there are many many people with aspergers who deal with their problems daily, so well that you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between them and someone without aspergers. Now, taking that into account. Were you say to, tomorrow discover a co-worker had a disability that you'd been completely unaware of, are you honestly fucking saying that they somehow owe it to the world to work to a far higher standard than even you yourself would be expected to?

(Apologies for the profanity, I don't like using it but the issue really pisses me off.)
 

nikomas1

New member
Jul 3, 2008
754
0
0
Seldon2639 said:
nikomas1 said:
Seldon2639 said:
nikomas1 said:
Please, please don't compare a psychological disorder to a physical trait, you can't compare those.
Because one is something you can overcome with effort and perseverance, and one is something you're stuck with your whole life? I'm pretty sure I can't will myself taller. I'm not sure what your objection to the analogy is, but you're now evading the point I made (which did not require the analogy in order to be poignant)
(Just noticed this one)And I can't will or force this disorder of me either, no matter how bad I try, I can learn to suppress with my problems, but never rid myself completely of them. Just as how a short guy can learn to live that way, but now magically grow taller.
Right, so I'm not sure what your objection was. In the same way a short person has to be able to jump really high to play in the NBA, or an ugly person has to be really smart to be accepted into society, a person with asperger's has to have some exceptionally good trait to make up for it.
Well then, a short person may never be able to play basketball, just as I can't see myself at a party or anything similar, but he can still be good at other things, just as I, while I have my problems, am very clever and can come up with very different solutions to problems that others usually never think of, that is a compensation.

A short guy would never ever need to win the NBA, I would never need to go to a big social "thing", I have other good traits, those make up for it.
 

Seldon2639

New member
Feb 21, 2008
1,756
0
0
nikomas1 said:
Seldon2639 said:
nikomas1 said:
Seldon2639 said:
nikomas1 said:
Please, please don't compare a psychological disorder to a physical trait, you can't compare those.
Because one is something you can overcome with effort and perseverance, and one is something you're stuck with your whole life? I'm pretty sure I can't will myself taller. I'm not sure what your objection to the analogy is, but you're now evading the point I made (which did not require the analogy in order to be poignant)
(Just noticed this one)And I can't will or force this disorder of me either, no matter how bad I try, I can learn to suppress with my problems, but never rid myself completely of them. Just as how a short guy can learn to live that way, but now magically grow taller.
Right, so I'm not sure what your objection was. In the same way a short person has to be able to jump really high to play in the NBA, or an ugly person has to be really smart to be accepted into society, a person with asperger's has to have some exceptionally good trait to make up for it.
Well then, a short person may never be able to play basketball, just as I can't see myself at a party or anything similar, but he can still be good at other things, just as I, while I have my problems, am very clever and can come up with very different solutions to problems that others usually never think of, that is a compensation.

A short guy would never ever need to win the NBA, I would never need to go to a big social "thing", I have other good traits, those make up for it.
Precisely. Your other good traits make up for the areas in which you're lacking. But that's not acceptance of your flaws, it's an understanding that you have other positive qualities which can make up for the negative ones, which was my point from the get go. We've been in violent disagreement.
 

jockslap

New member
May 20, 2008
654
0
0
LordMarcusX said:
5 out of 12 votes say they actually have Asperger's Syndrome? It's the new A.D.D.

Not to say Asperger's is a joke. To have it is potentially debilitating. But being anti-social, shy, or agoraphobic is not to have Asperger's. There are serious neurological issues at work with Asperger's.
asperger's syndrome causes people to go to extremes, for example a person naturally shy will be seriously afraid of new people, someone naturally quiet will become all but silent, etc

ive got a friend whos name is Julian (but we all call him the mummy, cuz all he does is mumble thanks to his asperger's)
 

Seldon2639

New member
Feb 21, 2008
1,756
0
0
GothmogII said:
I'm trying to see where you're coming from...but all I'm getting is an educated bigot vibe, and don't take that as a slight against you personally if you can, it's just how I'm reading your comments.

So, you're saying that, based on the fact that people with disabilities mental or physical or personality wise. That, not only do they have to work to a standard by which they can interact normally with society. But that they have to work above and beyond that because...what?

Let's try it this way:

Bill is deaf.
Bob is fully hearing.
Bill needs an interpreter.
Bill and Bob work in an office doing spreadsheets.
Both do excellent work and are paid the same wages.
Bill needs to work that much harder because he is a burden on his company through his need of an interpreter. Despite that the quality of his work is basically the same as Bob's.

Yeah...what a lovely world you live in.

You're right. People with disabilities do have to work a little harder, but not in the way you're imagining. Just so, as I've mentioned several times in this very thread, there are many many people with aspergers who deal with their problems daily, so well that you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between them and someone without aspergers. Now, taking that into account. Were you say to, tomorrow discover a co-worker had a disability that you'd been completely unaware of, are you honestly fucking saying that they somehow owe it to the world to work to a far higher standard than even you yourself would be expected to?

(Apologies for the profanity, I don't like using it but the issue really pisses me off.)
The concept of an educated bigot, while humorous, is a contradiction in terms. I may be intolerant (hell, I *am* intolerant), but it's not without thought. My lack of tolerance is well-reasoned and articulate, not bigoted. I have a reason for my disdain.

In answer to your question, yes. Bill should work harder in order to make up to the company the resources they lose through the necessity of having an interpreter. If it costs twice as much for Bill to work (due to the interpreter), he should do twice the work. The company could hire two Bobs for the price of Bill, so the only reason the company should hire Bill is if he's *that* much better.

If you're Einstein-level brilliant, but have a disability (and I don't accept the "proof" that Einstein did), you should be accommodated since your contribution makes up for it. If you're not that brilliant or talented, you shouldn't get special treatment. Sink or swim.

My point was not that someone should be given more work just for having a disability. My point was that if someone requires accommodation for a disability (especially one like asperger's), they should have to make up for it in some other area. If I found out a coworker had it, and we were doing the same job for the same pay, I wouldn't care. If I found out he had it and needed to be given more time off, or work shorter hours, for the same pay, I'd be pissed.
 

tthor

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,931
0
0
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." Albert Einstein
 

nikomas1

New member
Jul 3, 2008
754
0
0
Seldon2639 said:
nikomas1 said:
Seldon2639 said:
nikomas1 said:
Seldon2639 said:
nikomas1 said:
Please, please don't compare a psychological disorder to a physical trait, you can't compare those.
Because one is something you can overcome with effort and perseverance, and one is something you're stuck with your whole life? I'm pretty sure I can't will myself taller. I'm not sure what your objection to the analogy is, but you're now evading the point I made (which did not require the analogy in order to be poignant)
(Just noticed this one)And I can't will or force this disorder of me either, no matter how bad I try, I can learn to suppress with my problems, but never rid myself completely of them. Just as how a short guy can learn to live that way, but now magically grow taller.
Right, so I'm not sure what your objection was. In the same way a short person has to be able to jump really high to play in the NBA, or an ugly person has to be really smart to be accepted into society, a person with asperger's has to have some exceptionally good trait to make up for it.
Well then, a short person may never be able to play basketball, just as I can't see myself at a party or anything similar, but he can still be good at other things, just as I, while I have my problems, am very clever and can come up with very different solutions to problems that others usually never think of, that is a compensation.

A short guy would never ever need to win the NBA, I would never need to go to a big social "thing", I have other good traits, those make up for it.
Precisely. Your other good traits make up for the areas in which you're lacking. But that's not acceptance of your flaws, it's an understanding that you have other positive qualities which can make up for the negative ones, which was my point from the get go. We've been in violent disagreement.
I would call this more of a "Intelligently stupid" discussion, now, figure that one out, because I lost the point of this argument a while back.
 

tthor

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,931
0
0
nikomas1 said:
Seldon2639 said:
nikomas1 said:
Seldon2639 said:
nikomas1 said:
Seldon2639 said:
nikomas1 said:
Please, please don't compare a psychological disorder to a physical trait, you can't compare those.
Because one is something you can overcome with effort and perseverance, and one is something you're stuck with your whole life? I'm pretty sure I can't will myself taller. I'm not sure what your objection to the analogy is, but you're now evading the point I made (which did not require the analogy in order to be poignant)
(Just noticed this one)And I can't will or force this disorder of me either, no matter how bad I try, I can learn to suppress with my problems, but never rid myself completely of them. Just as how a short guy can learn to live that way, but now magically grow taller.
Right, so I'm not sure what your objection was. In the same way a short person has to be able to jump really high to play in the NBA, or an ugly person has to be really smart to be accepted into society, a person with asperger's has to have some exceptionally good trait to make up for it.
Well then, a short person may never be able to play basketball, just as I can't see myself at a party or anything similar, but he can still be good at other things, just as I, while I have my problems, am very clever and can come up with very different solutions to problems that others usually never think of, that is a compensation.

A short guy would never ever need to win the NBA, I would never need to go to a big social "thing", I have other good traits, those make up for it.
Precisely. Your other good traits make up for the areas in which you're lacking. But that's not acceptance of your flaws, it's an understanding that you have other positive qualities which can make up for the negative ones, which was my point from the get go. We've been in violent disagreement.
I would call this more of a "Intelligently stupid" discussion, now, figure that one out, because I lost the point of this argument a while back.
lol i've been thinking that for a while
 

nikomas1

New member
Jul 3, 2008
754
0
0
tthor said:
nikomas1 said:
Seldon2639 said:
nikomas1 said:
Seldon2639 said:
nikomas1 said:
Seldon2639 said:
nikomas1 said:
Please, please don't compare a psychological disorder to a physical trait, you can't compare those.
Because one is something you can overcome with effort and perseverance, and one is something you're stuck with your whole life? I'm pretty sure I can't will myself taller. I'm not sure what your objection to the analogy is, but you're now evading the point I made (which did not require the analogy in order to be poignant)
(Just noticed this one)And I can't will or force this disorder of me either, no matter how bad I try, I can learn to suppress with my problems, but never rid myself completely of them. Just as how a short guy can learn to live that way, but now magically grow taller.
Right, so I'm not sure what your objection was. In the same way a short person has to be able to jump really high to play in the NBA, or an ugly person has to be really smart to be accepted into society, a person with asperger's has to have some exceptionally good trait to make up for it.
Well then, a short person may never be able to play basketball, just as I can't see myself at a party or anything similar, but he can still be good at other things, just as I, while I have my problems, am very clever and can come up with very different solutions to problems that others usually never think of, that is a compensation.

A short guy would never ever need to win the NBA, I would never need to go to a big social "thing", I have other good traits, those make up for it.
Precisely. Your other good traits make up for the areas in which you're lacking. But that's not acceptance of your flaws, it's an understanding that you have other positive qualities which can make up for the negative ones, which was my point from the get go. We've been in violent disagreement.
I would call this more of a "Intelligently stupid" discussion, now, figure that one out, because I lost the point of this argument a while back.
lol i've been thinking that for a while
I guess I felt insulted, but I don't anymore, so it's kinda hard to keep the argumental flame alive.
 

tthor

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,931
0
0
urprobablyright said:
57 people have aspergers? interesting

I am pretty sure a ton of them are hypochondriacs.

I know for a year or so I proudly told people I was clinically depressed - held onto it like a pathetic baby holds onto a float in the pool - and i realized one day that I wasn't depressed, i was just looking for reasons as to why i was overweight, why people disliked me and why i procrastinated so much. I now think people who self-diagnose are forgettable, and I think -in general - psychiatrists know less than me about human nature.

As for AS:

I am not too sure if i know what it is - I'm thinking of The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night Time, did the protagonist have aspergers? i'm pretty sure he did - but i think i do. I'm sure there are many types of the syndrome but i didn't know that people with asperger's syndrome would use words like "I went through hell" since, as far as i remember, they don't have very developed understandings of those kinds of words. I might just not know enough.
WHY would ppl with AS not understand what "went thru hell" means???
if anything, ppl with AS have a very large vocabulary

plz, if you are going to make statements like these, atleast have an idea of what u are talking about
 

searanox

New member
Sep 22, 2008
864
0
0
For a little while, I thought I was a borderline case. Then I realised that I was being paranoid and over-analytical, and that my current "disorders" are enough to explain my state. I'm now of the persuasion that it's just the rest of the world that's fucked up beyond repair.
 

tthor

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,931
0
0
searanox said:
For a little while, I thought I was a borderline case. Then I realised that I was being paranoid and over-analytical, and that my current "disorders" are enough to explain my state. I'm now of the persuasion that it's just the rest of the world that's fucked up beyond repair.
many disorders can sometimes easily be overdiagnosed as AS
 

Azeban

New member
Sep 27, 2008
229
0
0
I know about it from Boston Legal. A character named Jerry suffered from it. I think they handled it very academically, making note of both humor and tragedy of the disease. Part of the human condition to laugh at terrible things, isn't it? If only due to fear.
 

tthor

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,931
0
0
Azeban said:
I know about it from Boston Legal. A character named Jerry suffered from it. I think they handled it very academically, making note of both humor and tragedy of the disease. Part of the human condition to laugh at terrible things, isn't it? If only due to fear.
plz do not view that as an accurate depiction of AS

i honestly found it incredibly offensive how they portrayed AS