Poll: Assassin's Creed 3, Future, Past
- Thread starter Donttazemehbro
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I see you're a Zero Punctuation fan, eh?yersimapestis said:it isnt a rehash retard. a rehash is like the tomb raider games only upgrading the graphics and even having the same basic storyline, whereas acII has new weapons new story new abilities and ubisoft actually used the critisicim to make the game better. so shut up you stupid trollSpace Spoons said:I don't own the game because it's a rehash of the original. Do you see how that works?Kermi said:Space Spoons said:
Good thing your opinion is informed, or I might question it's validity.
Please, let's all stop arguing.
I'm not a big fan of the arguing and personal attacks *which I have received for trying to make light of the arguing* so i fully agree with:
Earlier on in this topic someone suggested the brittish industrial revolution, around the 1800's. That I think would be a really good step up imo! Not enough guns to make it ruin the whole 2 blade stealth thang and enough smog and evil characters at the time to make the story interesting.
ANYWAY
Earlier on in this topic someone suggested the brittish industrial revolution, around the 1800's. That I think would be a really good step up imo! Not enough guns to make it ruin the whole 2 blade stealth thang and enough smog and evil characters at the time to make the story interesting.
I think they should make Desmond the main assassin and you go around the city he is in pulling off cool assassinations.
Isn't the point of Ezio in AC2 is so that Desmond can learn all his skills just like he did? Or the 'bleeding effect'?
Isn't the point of Ezio in AC2 is so that Desmond can learn all his skills just like he did? Or the 'bleeding effect'?
I spoiled myself. It's a teaser for sure, giving only vague hints of what the next game might hold. Well, it gives kinda strong hints unless there's some incredibly weird twists in the plot or something.omega 616 said:
Oh, and by the way - having just finished Ass Greed I - does it really really just leave you hanging in the end? Like, is there supposed to happen something after Desmond gets the eagle vision and sees all the cultist scribbles around the room or is he just forever stuck in the room until you get frustrated and shut down the console?
French Revolution should be decent. I'm hoping it ends up there or in the European Industrial Revolution.
Thing is, it's a sequel. The point of a sequel isn't to change up the gameplay constantly, but rather to expand and improve on the original's gameplay while keeping the core concepts and continuing the story. No direct sequel brings massive changes, they just (sometimes) make things better. In that respect, AC2 is fantastic, it's less repetitive, more diverse and more interesting.Space Spoons said:AC1 was one of the first 360 games I purchased. I'd followed the development history of it, thought it sounded really interesting, and determined that if I ever bought a "next-gen" console, I'd play it. And so, I did.Kermi said:I have my doubts about your claims. The new blending system, the changes to the weapons and combat, the way you complete your assassinations, the additional abilities... based on your gamerscore for AC1 and your claim to have spent four hours with AC2 tells me you've spent more time with AC2 than you did with AC1. Unless you spent a few hours with AC1, decided to buy it anyway, then stopped playing it.Space Spoons said:Not owning the game doesn't mean I've never played it. I played the first, and found it mildly entertaining, if a bit repetitive. The sequel warranted my attention, but I wasn't impressed enough by the original to purchase it immediately, so I figured it'd be prudent to try the game out before dropping $60 on it.Kermi said:I point to my original comment, which inferred that not having played the game your comments can hardly be considered a reasonable assessment of what the game offers.Space Spoons said:I don't own the game because it's a rehash of the original. Do you see how that works?Kermi said:Space Spoons said:
Good thing your opinion is informed, or I might question it's validity.
Do you see how that works?
I personally found AC2 to be quite fresh, with several great improvements in the gameplay and storytelling compared to the original.
But if you want to stand by your "I haven't played it but still know everything about it" position, who am I to stop you?
I tried it. In about four hours of playtime, I found nothing but more of the same. Hence, I think it's a rehash, and therefore not worth purchasing.
Maybe that's why you don't see the difference. However, I personally (once again, based on achievements) have spent less time with AC1 than you, (although I did watch my wife complete the bulk of it) and even I felt it was a distinct improvement.
You're correct, I still haven't finished it. To be honest, every time I play it, I end up getting distracted with murdering rooftop guards and starting fistfights in the streets. It's a bit like a medieval Grand Theft Auto for me. That, and I wasn't eager to resume playing as Desmond in "the real world", since I found it really boring.
I wouldn't say I spent more actual time with ACII, though I certainly made more progress. I didn't spend nearly as much time "messing around" with it as I did with the original, because I was eager to get to "the good stuff". You know, Da Vinci's Flying machines, the Spanish Inquisition, stuff like that. Such moments were few and far between, I'm afraid.
As I said, the changes to scenery and weaponry were interesting, but in my opinion, minor; it just wasn't enough to warrant the purchase.
I'd like it to be set around the War for Independance, what with a few of the founding fathers supposedly being Templars or Freemasons (I'm not that knowledgable on American History so I could be way off). The Assasins would be a neutral faction, trying to stop the Templars getting control of what will become one of the most powerful countries in the world, and the wealth that would come with it.
Not sure it'd sell well though and I imagine there would be alot of opposition about having to potentially hidden blade some prominent figures in American history lol.
Not sure it'd sell well though and I imagine there would be alot of opposition about having to potentially hidden blade some prominent figures in American history lol.
On Assassins Creed? Or Assassings Creed 2?omega 616 said:I have 94% of the trophies on ps3 ...MetalBaird said:I had Assassins Creed for the ps3, so, sadly no trophies
Because as far as I know they did not update Ass Creed with trophies.