Poll: Avatar's re-release, you going to see it?

Recommended Videos

Deadlock Radium

New member
Mar 29, 2009
2,276
0
0
Nope, I thought Avatar was "meh". Sure, the CGI were very pretty, but the story was still "meh" in my opinion.
 

jayman52

New member
Sep 12, 2009
19
0
0
Marter said:
I'm considering it. Never saw it when it originally came out, and I would like to experience it.
No and it isn't an "experience". An experience is bungee jumping. This is crap.
 

Glamorgan

Seer of Light
Aug 16, 2009
3,124
0
0
Not a chance. If I want to watch it in 3D, I will buy a 3D TV. But no way in hell will I go back to the cinemas.
 

JourneyThroughHell

New member
Sep 21, 2009
5,010
0
0
I promised to give it a second chance, so I will. If I didn't, there would be no way in hell I would pay to see that again.
 

WaffleGod

New member
Oct 22, 2008
217
0
0
No way in hell I'm ever going to watch that movie again.

IMO, most overrated movie ever? The first time I watched it, I was also siding with the bad-guy. Hell, all in all, Avatar boiled down to "Pocahontas on an alien planet". Jeez that movie bored the crap out of me... From the start of the movie, I could already predict what was going to happen. The only thing the movie had going for it was visuals.
 

Kaltazraza

Creepy dancing
Sep 10, 2008
532
0
0
My friend said that the re-release of the dvd will contain another 8min not included in the re-release for cinema.
 

Spinozaad

New member
Jun 16, 2008
1,107
0
0
Fuck no.

They'd need an extra two hours to correct the shitfest of a plothole that movie was.
 

Asuka Soryu

New member
Jun 11, 2010
2,437
0
0
Yes! Take money out of your wallet, not once, not twice(DVD), not even three times... but four times! That'll show us. Jame's Cameron would also like to thank you for donating to his wallet.
 

Chaos-Spider

New member
Dec 18, 2009
275
0
0
Bouncing Ferret FIlm said:
So someone, somewhere, got the bight idea that if Avatar was going to have a DVD Special Edition, why not re-release it in the theaters. Make everyone pay again to see an additional 15 minutes of footage.

The question is, are you going to see it?

I for one am not. I love the extra features on a dvd. Behind the scenes looks, and deleted/alternate scenes, and directors commentary. However, unless i can take the ticket stub I bought for the original movie and go see this one, I personally don't see why I have to pay an additional 10/15 bucks to see an additional 15 minutes.
Hopefully I won't but if the rest of the family decides to see it I won't be able to do much about it. Also I heard that it's only 9 additional minutes. That's right. you have to sit through a three hour movie just to see the 9 extra minutes of which probably 2 will be a PG13 sex scene that wasn't nearly as good as the one you had imagined for yourself.
 

TastySurvivor

Vault-Tec Beat Writer
Jun 14, 2010
117
0
0
no, i rented avatar, sat through about 30 min, realized it was just a better visualized rip off of Fern Gully: The Last Rain Forest, got bored, and returned it. Why would i go pay to see it again?
 

Ocelano

New member
Apr 14, 2009
455
0
0
emeraldrafael said:
Short answer: No.
Long Answer: FUCK NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Really? For 8 extra minutes he finds a need for them to put it BACK in theatres? After he wasted so much time that my theatre didnt get Crazy Heart (way better movie) and OVER stayed becuase it was in for the wahtever awards? PLus the fact He's RE-releasing Titanic in 2012? Nope, sorry Mr. Cameron. You may be able to full a good portion of the world, but not me. I will not hand over my $11 just so you can sit atop your white horse on that Six mile high pedastol you placed yourself upon and laugh as everyone falls into your hands like damned sheep. I am the wolf, and I do not follow.
QUESTION Has he actually made titanic good? And by good I obviously mean cut out at least 80% of the pointless romantic bollocks which took up 90 percent of the film and could just as easily been covered by a montage, And just have , SHIP LEAVES, THEY FALL FOR EACH OTHER(quickly), SHIP HITS ICEBERG, SHIP GOES DOWN(epic only good bit in the hole original film) most everybody dies and she mourns his loss.

That might be worthwhile to see, If on the other hand they have diluted the story any more than they have already then I say SCREW HIM.

PS I am aware this will probably enrage some fans don't care no one on this site knows me so HA
 

Ocelano

New member
Apr 14, 2009
455
0
0
soutbr1 said:
no, i rented avatar, sat through about 30 min, realized it was just a better visualized rip off of Furn Gully: The Last Rain Forest, got bored, and returned it. Why would i go pay to see it again?
Thank god for another person who sees the truth I have had it up to here with dancing with smurfs never seen the wolf one butr as soon as I saw avatar I also thought FERNGULLY RIP OFF swap pixie magic with technology, 12 foot blue aliens with itsy bitsy pixies, the giant black panther thing with a singing goanna and the big red flying lizard with an insane fruit bat and your there
 

Meemaimoh

New member
Aug 20, 2009
368
0
0
dalek sec said:
The only way I'll see that movie again is if in the end the Na'vi are brutally crushed by the Imperial Guard led by Commisar Cain: Hero of the Imperium!

I didn't hate the movie but it's not exactly one of my faveorites.
Oh my god, I would definitely pay to see this. But then, I'd simply pay to see Cain.
 

llew

New member
Sep 9, 2009
584
0
0
ragestreet said:
If I wanted to see a beautiful piece of crap I'd buy an expensive suit and take a shit in it.
No I won't be buying it.
This my friend, is genius
 

asam92

New member
Oct 26, 2008
494
0
0
Only die-hard suckers will actually PAY more money, you know the ones who went and saw this in the cinemas 5 times or more.
My friend saw it 4 times but he had good reason too, he went with different people each time, I still thought it a bit strange you would actually agree to it though. Sure it was a decent movie, but I have definitely seen better.