To piss off more fans, I'll add this. I want him to redo it, where Jack keeps the necklace thing, then pushes her off and goes to safety. He's rich, what the fuck does he care about her? He'll get plenty of tail in New York. She was just dumb enough to let him draw her naked.Ocelano said:QUESTION Has he actually made titanic good? And by good I obviously mean cut out at least 80% of the pointless romantic bollocks which took up 90 percent of the film and could just as easily been covered by a montage, And just have , SHIP LEAVES, THEY FALL FOR EACH OTHER(quickly), SHIP HITS ICEBERG, SHIP GOES DOWN(epic only good bit in the hole original film) most everybody dies and she mourns his loss.emeraldrafael said:Short answer: No.
Long Answer: FUCK NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Really? For 8 extra minutes he finds a need for them to put it BACK in theatres? After he wasted so much time that my theatre didnt get Crazy Heart (way better movie) and OVER stayed becuase it was in for the wahtever awards? PLus the fact He's RE-releasing Titanic in 2012? Nope, sorry Mr. Cameron. You may be able to full a good portion of the world, but not me. I will not hand over my $11 just so you can sit atop your white horse on that Six mile high pedastol you placed yourself upon and laugh as everyone falls into your hands like damned sheep. I am the wolf, and I do not follow.
That might be worthwhile to see, If on the other hand they have diluted the story any more than they have already then I say SCREW HIM.
PS I am aware this will probably enrage some fans don't care no one on this site knows me so HA
Seconded. It wouldn't be any fun without Jurgen and Amberly though.Sicamat said:I would gladly pay for this.dalek sec said:The only way I'll see that movie again is if in the end the Na'vi are brutally crushed by the Imperial Guard led by Commisar Cain: Hero of the Imperium!
I"m not so sure that this was James Cameron doing. There are to many heads behind the production, financial, and promotional areas to blame on just one person. Honestly, even if James Cameron didn't like it, i don't think there was much he could have said to stop it.Undead Dragon King said:Really, James Cameron?
Do you REALLY need to do this? You have (minus inflation) one of the highest grossing movies in the history of cinema and you want us to see it AGAIN? With 10 extra minutes? What could those 10 minutes possible contribute to the asinine and overused plot of this movie?
I give you, sir, the double flip-off. Enjoy the millions more you'll make for this re-release.
Speaking of Titanic, my issue with is was the over hype on Leo. JESUS, every where i turned was screaming googling girls with his picture everywhere... and I mean everywhere. The rest of the movie really didn't bother me. And to be honest, I'm happy that leo took all that time off cuz now i can go watch him and we can all recognize him for the awesome actor he is.Ocelano said:QUESTION Has he actually made titanic good? And by good I obviously mean cut out at least 80% of the pointless romantic bollocks which took up 90 percent of the film and could just as easily been covered by a montage, And just have , SHIP LEAVES, THEY FALL FOR EACH OTHER(quickly), SHIP HITS ICEBERG, SHIP GOES DOWN(epic only good bit in the hole original film) most everybody dies and she mourns his loss.emeraldrafael said:Short answer: No.
Long Answer: FUCK NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Really? For 8 extra minutes he finds a need for them to put it BACK in theatres? After he wasted so much time that my theatre didnt get Crazy Heart (way better movie) and OVER stayed becuase it was in for the wahtever awards? PLus the fact He's RE-releasing Titanic in 2012? Nope, sorry Mr. Cameron. You may be able to full a good portion of the world, but not me. I will not hand over my $11 just so you can sit atop your white horse on that Six mile high pedastol you placed yourself upon and laugh as everyone falls into your hands like damned sheep. I am the wolf, and I do not follow.
That might be worthwhile to see, If on the other hand they have diluted the story any more than they have already then I say SCREW HIM.
PS I am aware this will probably enrage some fans don't care no one on this site knows me so HA
captaincabbage said:not to mention Fer Gully was cooler. At leasat the bad guy (Hexxus) was the most awesomely evil looking guy ever. Tim Curry for the win.soutbr1 said:no, i rented avatar, sat through about 30 min, realized it was just a better visualized rip off of Furn Gully: The Last Rain Forest, got bored, and returned it. Why would i go pay to see it again?
For the uninitiated