Poll: Black Ops or BC:2

Recommended Videos

kane.malakos

New member
Jan 7, 2011
344
0
0
DragonLord Seth said:
I like BlOps because I like the more FFA tactics, but without everyone out to kill me. The Sticks and Stones Wager matches are also awesome.
I, IMHO (nobody better ***** about this!), think that BC2 is incredibly boring. The huge maps are cool, and so are the destructo-physics, but when I rented it, I would always get sniped by some dick on the other side of the map! And don't get me started about the bullshit unlock screen, I don't even know who unlocks the shotgun! And why would I want to press the trigger AGAIN to re-cock the sniper? Bullshit.
I can respect people's opinions about liking BC2 and not BlOps, hell, some of my friends on both XBL and Steam love BC2, but if you call me a "Biased fanboy", then you are obviously a retard. Why? Because I rented BF:BC2, and after 15 minutes and the Mark of Shame (the play for 15 minutes achieve), I went back to Blockbuster and turned it in for Assassin's Creed 2.
The shotgun gets unlocked for everyone. You level up the classes and have an overall level. The shotguns get unlocked when your overall level reaches a certain point. It's actually really fun to have the sniper upgrades on a close-range class... Because of the huge maps it takes a very different play style than COD, so it's not for everyone. But, at least in my opinion, it's one of the funnest multi-player games around.
 

Tibs

New member
Mar 23, 2011
273
0
0
BC2 was the first online shooter I ever played. I spent over 700 hours playing that games multiplayer and those were amazing times. The combat was great, teamwork was not forced or essential, but incredibly helpful and I was a beast at it.

Its funny in the fact that I now suck at that game. Didn't play it for a month and lost all my skill.
 

icyneesan

New member
Feb 28, 2010
1,881
0
0
BC2. I don't care what others say the Single player was awesome and fun. Black Ops just felt like recycled MW stuff.
 

Still Life

New member
Sep 22, 2010
1,137
0
0
I really enjoy Black Ops as a matter of fact.

However, it doesn't touch the beast that is BF:BC2.
 

Lawyer105

New member
Apr 15, 2009
599
0
0
Bad Company 2 any day of the week!

That said, I prefer much more tactical gameplay, so I'm having a lot of fun with America's Army (buggy as it is) at the moment.

Even in PUG's you can get some really good teamwork going, especially if you get yourself onto a relatively full clan-server. You'll be in a mixed-weapons team, where people watch their sectors (and your back), mark targets, and almost nobody is acting like a squirrel on crack, so it's pretty cool. You also only get one life (no respawns) - you'd expect a lot of camping, but my experience is that people don't camp, but they play a LOT more tactically, using cover, moving slowly behind ridgelines etc.

It is a bit buggy (more so than BC2) but it's still a better game.
 
Mar 9, 2010
2,722
0
0
BF:BC2 easily. Don't get me wrong, I've played Black Ops till my hands have bled, but BC2 just has so much more tactical gameplay than BO. Black Ops requires you to run forward and back on the map to get as many kills as possible, occasionally having to plant a bomb, while also not dying. With Battlefield, you actually have to take a position that is tactically useful and hold onto it with your team for dear life, rather than run to the enemy spawn and kill them while they're there.

There's also none of this kill streak bullshit that I've grown to hate. You get your helicopter to fly, your quad bike to ride and the gun in your hands and you have to do what you can with that. The sniping is also far superior to Black Ops. I'm by no means as good on BF:BC2 as I am on Black Ops, but I'm getting better and I'm loving it more and more as I play.
 

YuheJi

New member
Mar 17, 2009
927
0
0
Honestly, I feel that the current Call of Duty multiplayer is like all the frustrating parts of Bad Company 2, but all the time. Camping, cheating, respawning and dying right away, etc.
 

KissofKetchup

New member
May 26, 2008
702
0
0
Haven't played BLOPs but I have no intention to. BC2 has more than been a bang for my buck. The whole perks system that COD has turns me off. With BC2 there are no ultimate perk combo which is nice

Plus knifing people is so damn satisfying in BC2!!!!
 

Waaghpowa

Needs more Dakka
Apr 13, 2010
3,073
0
0
BFBC2 because not only does it require more team work, the addition of destruction and ballistics adds difficulty overall. I know it doesn't stop people from doing it, but the idea with ballistics is that not everyone can snipe from across the map and just pile on kills. The intention of the sniper is less about kill counts and more about suppression.
 

Timedraven 117

New member
Jan 5, 2011
456
0
0
lobster1077 said:
Black Ops...Those campers...those horrible, horrible campers
i kinda camp only in the sense of defense and staying alive especially if you are just charging. also Bad compony hands down in that game the likelyhood of connection problums is low compared to black ops with every 5 games and destructible envirns with fun gameplay is perfect. BLOPS? hell if i wanted the worst mess of a glitched up cocaine fueled mess with kids 10 years old being dicks(luckily i have a modrate nat type so i am spared from the "what the hell you piecie of butt sniffin retard" shit)with most games you are dominated i would play Black Ops. have to give points to its singleplayer even though when i first played it hadd a glitch on the first level where it randomly said at tis one moment that i failed to protect someone.
 

Rednog

New member
Nov 3, 2008
3,567
0
0
If I was playing on a console I'd go with Black Ops, but considering I own Black Ops for the PC (and considering that it is an abomination on the PC) I'll give it to BC2 this time.
 

Gitty101

New member
Jan 22, 2010
960
0
0
BF:BC2. Why? Multiplayer is massive, destructive, skillfull and highly enjoyable. BLOPS on the other hand, twitchy, repetative and has a horrible fanbase :p