More like the other way round. The germans broke though and the US arrived just in time to stop them. Most people wouldn't like WWI. Only fixed machine guns, few tanks, hardly any even semi-auto weapons. WWI would only feature in something like timesplitters.Lordmarkus said:It sure would be nice with a Call of Duty: Vietnam but why not something from WW1. Yes, I know that this debate has reach a stalemate just like the whole war but didn't the attacks gain moveabality when the americans started pooring in around 1917?
Grammar helps your cause.ekkaman said:cod arabian conflict
form the point of view of an insergent against america or other way as well in iraq thats what i want to play one team has 500 tickets(insrgancy) other have 100 tickets (us army) the secod has tanks planes troop carries missiles body armour ect while first has basic kit solder, demo , heavy ect and its realistic tanks take butt loads to blow so you have to loss a few guys to take one out basiclly 5v1 america has the might the other guys better think on their feet or pwnage insures like in the real world no balance for you crying little worms ow its not fair his craps better than mine real life issue pal get over it this game would rock people rock
Dude... grammar. As darth said, maybe grammar can help your cause.ekkaman said:cod arabian conflict
form the point of view of an insergent against america or other way as well in iraq thats what i want to play one team has 500 tickets(insrgancy) other have 100 tickets (us army) the secod has tanks planes troop carries missiles body armour ect while first has basic kit solder, demo , heavy ect and its realistic tanks take butt loads to blow so you have to loss a few guys to take one out basiclly 5v1 america has the might the other guys better think on their feet or pwnage insures like in the real world no balance for you crying little worms ow its not fair his craps better than mine real life issue pal get over it this game would rock people rock
Very true, that's why I would really welcome a Vietnam CoD done properly, an honest Vietnam game. I think even the Vietnam vets would welcome honesty for once, if they would make a CoD Vietnam game they should make it in conjunction with veterans.Dys said:No, we shouldn't. Vietnam was a mistake, and more or less a disaster. It could be interesting if played from the vietcongs perspective, but we don't need (and I sure as hell don't want) another "America is awsome" style abomination of history.
Thank you for the insight. I knew that the germans were on strong march in 1918 but my knowledge about the americans part are a little fuzzy.lostclause said:More like the other way round. The germans broke though and the US arrived just in time to stop them. Most people wouldn't like WWI. Only fixed machine guns, few tanks, hardly any even semi-auto weapons. WWI would only feature in something like timesplitters.Lordmarkus said:It sure would be nice with a Call of Duty: Vietnam but why not something from WW1. Yes, I know that this debate has reach a stalemate just like the whole war but didn't the attacks gain moveabality when the americans started pooring in around 1917?
On topic: Vietnam is not too recent. Tunnel rats just came out and it was set in vietnam. It's like saying Cod 4 couldn't be set in the present day.
lol, thisMalicious said:Nah that war is stupid,just a bunch of americans attacking a country that has nothing to do with them and they had no reason to go there in the first place,then they lost. Wouldnt be fun to run around a jungle geting pwned by vietnamese then heroicly ending the game by losing -_-
I want a WW1 CoD!!!
Not just the Vietnamese perspective. Probably most of the world actually.lostclause said:From the vietnamese perspective yes. For everyone else they were merely doing the fighting for the bad guys (south vietnam).GodsOneMistake said:Wasn't America the bad guys in Nam? I can probably assume that from the severe lack of information that is taught to us about it.