Poll: Can England be invaded

Recommended Videos

lwm3398

New member
Apr 15, 2009
2,896
0
0
Zombie Badger said:
The only uninvadeable countries are Russia and Canada. Napoleon and Hitler got the shit kicked out of them trying to invade Russia, and when the US attacked Canada in the War of 1812, they lost and the Canadians burned down the White House.
okay,the country was recovering from a hard war, only about 20 years old,and it got it's capital burned.

we're talking modern warfare. wanna take us the fuck on,canada? prepare to lose. china,usa,russia(sort of),and the UK are pretty uninvadeable. you try to put canada on that list? pffffft.
 

Dagodweezl

New member
May 27, 2009
123
0
0
BudZer said:
It'd be incredibly easy considering it's just England. The Scottish and Welsh could join in, and clear it up for the French. The French could just ride over on a huge troop train from the Chunnel and raid London, sack the city, and bang, it's over. Of course that would require the French to win a war.

Perhaps the Americans could just station themselves in Paris.

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
sorry had to
 

BlackHat

New member
Jan 30, 2009
80
0
0
xChevelle24 said:
BlackHat said:
Nato command, Europe, Usa,Austria, Trident nuclear system, one of the best trained armys in the world which has won every conflict that it has been in since the F***kin romans,God, The Queen, The SAS, One of the best trained navys in the world, One of the most technologically advanced and best trained Airfoces, An entire nation who would fight to the death to protect it, Some of the tuffest sea crossing conditions in the world, Bad Weather, Some of the most famous generals in history and the stratigical heratige that it brings, One of the most innovative nations (we invented everything in the last 40 years and most of the modern battle tatics other than shock and awe which dosen't work for shit america two wars you havn't won vientnam and iraq), Stiff upper lip, The Scottish ( the only thing there really good at which is beating stuff up) , tea and ale

Nuff said
Not to start a flame war, but Navy Seals are better than the SAS. The U.S. airforce is better than yours. The U.S. Army is of larger force and also better trained. I could go on and on but that just invites a flame war. Oh, and when I see British soldiers baynet charging companies of soldiers when they stand no chance of winning, like, say the Japanese did in WWII, then you can that you would die for your country. Oh, and in case you didn't know, we declared Victory in Iraq over 4 years ago.

You can declair anything you like dosen't make it true

Flame war Ie he's going to napalm me

OK starting from WW2 which for arguments sake we wills say you were in (as little more than hired hands but nm) Look at your losses compaired to english and againin all the wars you have been in

England deploy small teams of effective units to capture objectives

Americans Run at them with hundreads of men whilst they get their legs blown off, you care as much for the individual solider as you do your bullets

IN the iraq war you suffered inordinate casulties becasue your porley lead
You either have the brains or eyesight of badgers when it comes to friendly fire

need i remind you we needed to paint the top of our tanks ORANGE just so your stupid A-10's woudln't shoot them i mean tell me how meny challenger tanks did iraqies have

"I see British soldiers baynet charging companies of soldiers when they stand no chance of winning," Where the fuck did you see that other than possilbe sharp or another 18th century reancment

And navy seals , ha you might as well call them the featch and carry brigades who drop lazer targeters and shoot everyone (including innocents)
 

Zombie Badger

New member
Dec 4, 2007
784
0
0
lwm3398 said:
Zombie Badger said:
Thanatos34 said:
Zombie Badger said:
The only uninvadeable countries are Russia and Canada. Napoleon and Hitler got the shit kicked out of them trying to invade Russia, and when the US attacked Canada in the War of 1812, they lost and the Canadians burned down the White House.
Err, I think you got your facts mixed up there. It was the British that burned down the White House in the War of 1812.
Thankyou for correcting me. Now I can tell Americans, 'My country kicked your arse!'

Zephirius said:
You forgot Greenland. It's 836,000 sq mi of ice and snow. I doubt anyone even wants to invade that.
Also another great example.
and i can tell you that your country got beat by some COUNTRY BUMPKINS equipped with the SLOWEST LOADING GUNS EVER. so yeah,you burned a building. we beat the biggest world superpower of the time with the odds at about 1 in 700.

if you were being sarcastic,sorry for being an ass like this.
They were not 'Country bumpkins'. You had the support of the vast French army who defeated us in a lot of battles, as they had you to bolster their numbers. When the last British troops surrendered, they surrendered to the French. Ever seen a street or town called 'Lafayette' something? It was named after the French General (More info at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Lafayette. Sorry, I don't know how to link.)
 

Zombie Badger

New member
Dec 4, 2007
784
0
0
lwm3398 said:
Zombie Badger said:
The only uninvadeable countries are Russia and Canada. Napoleon and Hitler got the shit kicked out of them trying to invade Russia, and when the US attacked Canada in the War of 1812, they lost and the Canadians burned down the White House.
okay,the country was recovering from a hard war, only about 20 years old,and it got it's capital burned.

we're talking modern warfare. wanna take us the fuck on,canada? prepare to lose. china,usa,russia(sort of),and the UK are pretty uninvadeable. you try to put canada on that list? pffffft.
The UK could be invaded, if would just be very difficult. Trying to invade Canada (The second largest country in the world), would be suicidal, as you would freeze to death the same way the Nazis did.
 

Desaari

New member
Feb 24, 2009
288
0
0
lwm3398 said:
EMFCRACKSHOT said:
But hey, America vs Britain=not likely to happen. We are the best of friends so lets concentrate on the true enemies. The Communists and left wingers.
this,this,fourteen milion times this.
Yes, the belief in equality is evil and must be destroyed.
 

EMFCRACKSHOT

Not quite Cthulhu
May 25, 2009
2,973
0
0
You could quite easily invave any country on earth, its just winning that would be a problem. Especially against the UK.
There are only a small number of lcations that could be used as viable beacheads, frocing the enemy to concentrate their troops, reducing the effectiveness of superior numbers; the ones at the back make it impossible for the ones at the front to fall back. It also means that they cant bring their full firepower to bear making numbers more even.
In the words of Rommel, the first 24 hours are the most important. If you fail to secure a beachead after 24 hours you have pretty much failed.
The only Countries that really stand a chance in winning would be the US or China. Even then it would be so costly that the would begin to question the point. We could do massive damage to any invasion fleet with the RN and RAF and an airborne invasion is damn near suicidal.
The SAS would of course at the same time take out the respective countries governments and leading generals and could be used to cripple production or just level new york.
A better question i think is could America be conquered. When everyone has a gun, any army is going to have flatten every town and kill every last man woman and child to stop resistance. But then, ther isnt really anything worth invading America for. What have they got that we havent? Absolutely nothing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

blackcherry

New member
Apr 9, 2008
706
0
0
Saul B said:
blackcherry said:
*snip*
Our country has few resources, a lot less political power than we like to think we have. You would kill most of our well trained armed forces taking the island, so that is out and in today's climate, potato farmers in Peru have nukes. Not to mention that by destroying England you have the potential to cause one of the worst financial crisis for a long time, by destroying our stock market
Ah. You're forgetting, our own bankers already completely fucked up our financial system.
Honestly, it would be a lot worse if they destroyed it. As it is, the country wouldn't be in the shape it is if panicked shock and shareholder holders hadn't listened to the media.
 

HellRaid

New member
Mar 19, 2009
126
0
0
Zombie Badger said:
The UK could be invaded, if would just be very difficult. Trying to invade Canada (The second largest country in the world), would be suicidal, as you would freeze to death the same way the Nazis did.
That Nazis invaded Canada? When did this happen? :O
 

Drakulla

New member
May 19, 2009
332
0
0
Two video games proved this to be true. Hellgate London and Resistance Fall of Man. England was invaded both times. All you need are aliens and or a portal to Hell to open up and there you go.
 

xChevelle24

New member
Mar 10, 2009
730
0
0
BlackHat said:
xChevelle24 said:
BlackHat said:
Nato command, Europe, Usa,Austria, Trident nuclear system, one of the best trained armys in the world which has won every conflict that it has been in since the F***kin romans,God, The Queen, The SAS, One of the best trained navys in the world, One of the most technologically advanced and best trained Airfoces, An entire nation who would fight to the death to protect it, Some of the tuffest sea crossing conditions in the world, Bad Weather, Some of the most famous generals in history and the stratigical heratige that it brings, One of the most innovative nations (we invented everything in the last 40 years and most of the modern battle tatics other than shock and awe which dosen't work for shit america two wars you havn't won vientnam and iraq), Stiff upper lip, The Scottish ( the only thing there really good at which is beating stuff up) , tea and ale

Nuff said
Not to start a flame war, but Navy Seals are better than the SAS. The U.S. airforce is better than yours. The U.S. Army is of larger force and also better trained. I could go on and on but that just invites a flame war. Oh, and when I see British soldiers baynet charging companies of soldiers when they stand no chance of winning, like, say the Japanese did in WWII, then you can that you would die for your country. Oh, and in case you didn't know, we declared Victory in Iraq over 4 years ago.

You can declair anything you like dosen't make it true

Flame war Ie he's going to napalm me

OK starting from WW2 which for arguments sake we wills say you were in (as little more than hired hands but nm) Look at your losses compaired to english and againin all the wars you have been in

England deploy small teams of effective units to capture objectives

Americans Run at them with hundreads of men whilst they get their legs blown off, you care as much for the individual solider as you do your bullets

IN the iraq war you suffered inordinate casulties becasue your porley lead
You either have the brains or eyesight of badgers when it comes to friendly fire

need i remind you we needed to paint the top of our tanks ORANGE just so your stupid A-10's woudln't shoot them i mean tell me how meny challenger tanks did iraqies have

"I see British soldiers baynet charging companies of soldiers when they stand no chance of winning," Where the fuck did you see that other than possilbe sharp or another 18th century reancment

And navy seals , ha you might as well call them the featch and carry brigades who drop lazer targeters and shoot everyone (including innocents)
You are forgetting to mention that the U.S. had so many more soldiers in WWII than the British did. Also, sure our army is retarded, because we have so many soldiers to spare we might as well just rush in. But with marines, paratroopers, etc. etc., we did no such thing. Band of Brothers and E-Z company is an excellent example of this. I think they even, yep, they did save about 150 British soldiers.

I won't even go into the Iraq war, that whole war was a mistake, and that line about the Iraq war and the line under it are so poorly worded I can't even understand them.

Friendly fire happens, it's part of war. When you are flying in a fucking plane, telling tanks apart might be a little challenging. It's not like you can radio in and ask them.

I was referring to the Japanese tactics during WWII. Even when they knew they would die, they would fight to the last man for their country, when Britain, US, Canada would all run away and try to regroup or what not.

Okay, maybe I shouldn't have been so bias in my opinion, but let me ask you this.

Great Britain, or England, is an island, therefore its supplies could be easily cut-off, leading the population to eventually starve to death. Why can't it be invaded?

It's surrounded by water, which, to my knowledge, is a completely neutral force, meaning you're country is 360 degrees worth of invasion capability. Why can't it be invaded?

This is not WWII, we have more sophisticated weapons now, not to mention the use of drones, missiles, etc. etc. Why can't it be invaded?
 
May 28, 2009
3,698
0
0
I know the Navy Seals are pretty elite in their own right, but they can't compare to the SAS. The SAS is one of the most rigorously trained military organisations in the world, renowned for how professional it is (ever seen anything about the Iranian embassy siege?).

Also, everyone knows England can be invaded (so can every other country), the real question should've been if it could've been invaded successfully.

And whoever said "AIR STRIKES" should remember that you can't win everything with air strikes, otherwise we'd have left Afghanistan and Iraq years ago.
 

Zombie Badger

New member
Dec 4, 2007
784
0
0
HellRaid said:
Zombie Badger said:
The UK could be invaded, if would just be very difficult. Trying to invade Canada (The second largest country in the world), would be suicidal, as you would freeze to death the same way the Nazis did.
That Nazis invaded Canada? When did this happen? :O
They invaded Russia and froze.
 

Iron Criterion

New member
Feb 4, 2009
1,271
0
0
If the whole world was against it then of course you berk. However if say just a couple nation tried it then no they wouldnt in this day and age. Thats what i'm hoping anyway because when I annouce my dictatorship it will be a pain in the arse if a few moments later the Americans invade LOL