I agree with this one. However, dying over petty emotional problems is for quitters.ify_ said:Yes.
Terminal cancer patient.
Chronic pain sufferer.
Dementia patient.
There are times when suicide is the best option...possibly even noble.
Agreed. And more often than not, they are drunk out of their mind.ix_tab said:No. Never.
When a person is suicidal, they are the definition of irrational.
You quoted me, but it had nothing to do with what I said. As far as I'm concerned, suicide is suicide, not murder. But, It's pointless getting bogged down in a bunch of wordplay. If I wanted to kill myself, nobody has any right to try to stop me, as it is not their life. It is mine. That may be hard to swallow, but a spade is a spade. I can choose to end my existence whenever I want.lwm3398 said:suicide because of depression or money problem is murder.
it tells you that to? me as well I'm curious and want to knowJester Lord said:It is possible but for most situations... no.
I had suicidal thoughts before but not because I was depressed but because I was bored and had this annoying voice in the back of my mind saying "Go ahead and kill yourself. It will finally answer the question of what happens after death."
I dismissed it by telling myself that suicide is for weak quitters and I was neither weak or a quitter.
true but you didn't see bush doing that when he decided we should go to iraqDyloss said:What if you living will cause thousands of deaths? Wouldn't it be a rational thing to kill one self? if it saved the lives of others?
Then it sucks to be those thousands of people.What if you living will cause thousands of deaths? Wouldn't it be a rational thing to kill one self? if it saved the lives of others?
I can't agree more.antipunt said:^Thisify_ said:Yes.
Terminal cancer patient.
Chronic pain sufferer.
Dementia patient.
There are times when suicide is the best option...possibly even noble.
I didn't read more than the first couple posts, so apologies if I'm repeating anything.CuddlyCombine said:What do you think? While I realize that it may be a hard topic, given the subjectivity involved in justifying something like suicide, think about it; in a case where a completely sane individual decides to kill him/herself, do you think rationale and logic can be applied? Is it destined to stay forever objective, mind-independent and only understood by those who have actually gone through the thoughts?
Grand displays of suicide discounted (jumping out of a train, shooting yourself on webcam, etc.). We're assuming that, since the subject would be sane, they'd use a convenient, quick method (poison et al.) that wouldn't traumatize everyone close to themselves. Too much, at least.
My view: yes, it could be rational. Sometimes, things become bad past the point of fixing them, and the benefits of death (to both oneself and loved ones) outweigh those of life. Of course, that's hypothetical, I've never seen this happen in real life.
Poll included for you folks who'll shout "TL;DR" unless you've got the Cliffs notes. Oh, and respect opinions and all that jazz.
Only if you are christian or some other pointless religion.Rutawitz said:nope.
isnt suicide a one way ticket to hell?
That's an interesting thought...what makes a person willing to take their own life weak?jasoncyrus said:Then it sucks to be those thousands of people.What if you living will cause thousands of deaths? Wouldn't it be a rational thing to kill one self? if it saved the lives of others?
Personally Suicide is for weak people who can;t handle what life throws at them. The only people allowed to top themselves are those who are crippled in some way, like people with ALS who will eventually be entombed in their own bodies unable to do anything. Hell I'd put a bullet in these people myself to end their suffering.