Theres also a tonne of modern games....it doesnt mean you have to play them all, theres good ones and bad ones.Barry93 said:I know, I don't think I can play another WWII fps, there's what, 50 of them in existance?
This is also a lie, Infinity Ward isnt making any more, they've dropped the name of CoD, which is good cause the only good ones they made were the original and its expansion.balimuzz said:I personally didn't like the direction that COD:WAW stepped in, and it seemed like a backwards step from what had been achieved with COD4. Still, Infinity Ward is making the rest of them, so my hope is that we don't have to see another COD:WAW.
Quoted for moer truthMcGee said:Definitely Modern Warfare. World at war was a huge disappointment for me.
yes, but most modern games take place in the middle east and have been overused just as much as WWIIWrongSprite said:I voted CoD3 cause the multiplayer was the best i've ever seen in a game. CoD5 comes second, as it is Cod4, but improved. Plus i love WW2.
Theres also a tonne of modern games....it doesnt mean you have to play them all, theres good ones and bad ones.Barry93 said:I know, I don't think I can play another WWII fps, there's what, 50 of them in existance?
Call of duty alone has like 4, then add random developers, Medal of honor, and you get around 50. So yes.Barry93 said:I know, I don't think I can play another WWII fps, there's what, 50 of them in existance?
Have you checked Hardcore mode? It's as close as you're going to get to a Martyrdom-free CoD.Davey Woo said:That said everyone on CoD 4 rack up points with random grenades and matyrdom, so I've lost all faith in both for the time being.