If someone's trying to kill me, I will do everything in my power to ensure I live, including killing the dude trying to kill me.
I call it irony.
I call it irony.
Can you blame us? We live in a horrible and emotionless world where, to quote Yahtzee, "an iPhone has a networth significantly higher than a human life".Codeman90 said:Makes sense, some just seem a bit to "eager" using self defense as a get out of jail free card to kill someone. I guess they would be easier to "stimulate" then =p
On instinct I'd kill to save my life myself. I hunt and I've used handguns and rifles for target practice so I'm a decent shot. Problem is I'd have a heck of a guilt trip afterwards. Incapacitating would be the best case scenario, but if it seems like the guy wouldn't give up or might hunt me down later, I'd have to make a tough decision.Caliostro said:Can you blame us? We live in a horrible and emotionless world where, to quote Yahtzee, "an iPhone has a networth significantly higher than a human life".Codeman90 said:Makes sense, some just seem a bit to "eager" using self defense as a get out of jail free card to kill someone. I guess they would be easier to "stimulate" then =p
Besides, it's a survival instinct.
Because the gun control fanatics don't need anything else to get worked up about. Having the "mowing down everyone in the streets" option does not help make the case that gun owners are for the most part responsible people. If killing another human being isn't emotionally scarring, then there's an issue, maybe if your life is on the line I can understand. But not just random genocides.ciortas1 said:Q: Do You think you could take a life to defend your own.
Easily, I have no tolerance nor pity for scum who refrain to stealing/killing/etc.
Q: The BadGuy is threatening not just your life, but your family's. Does this alter your reaction?
Not at all.
Q: Would the difference between the up-close kill, and the point and click of a ranged weapon have a difference on you?
The only difference would be how much blood splatters on me, I guess from a closer range it would be a little more disgusting.
Q: Would having a stranger's life on the line with yours make you change your reaction?
Probably not.
Why is there no 'If I had a gun I'd be cleaning up the streets right now' option for the poll? It automatically assumes killing people is hard and emotionally scarring for everyone.
1) Absolutely. If someone were attacking me, I would have no qualms beating them to death with their own spine, if need be. I refuse to start the conflict, but as soon as it turns physical, I will end it as quickly and permanently as I know how.Koeryn said:Q: Do You think you could take a life to defend your own.
Q: The BadGuy is threatening not just your life, but your family's. Does this alter your reaction?
Q: Would the difference between the up-close kill, and the point and click of a ranged weapon have a difference on you?
Q: Would having a stranger's life on the line with yours make you change your reaction?
Unfortunatly said degenerates don't exactly wear large neon signs saying "I AM A RAPIST/THIEF/KILLER" on there backs. Would make life easier though.ciortas1 said:Depends on how you feel about certain individuals of the human race. I certainly wouldn't kill anyone who's leading a normal life (even guys like Kotick, I believe he could be taught a lesson), but living where I am, any regard for thieves/rapist/killers and other degenerates as human beings is long gone.Codeman90 said:Because the gun control fanatics don't need anything else to get worked up about. Having the "mowing down everyone in the streets" option does not help make the case that gun owners are for the most part responsible people. If killing another human being isn't emotionally scarring, then there's an issue, maybe if your life is on the line I can understand. But not just random genocides.