Poll: Cross Platform Multiplayer?

Recommended Videos

LogieBear

New member
Mar 19, 2010
266
0
0
Minecraft will be the first Cross-Platform game that will sucessfully invade everything from PC to Cellphones =)

But yes I would like cross-Platform gaming, not because I want to prove myself (Im not getting into this 'Console Vs PC' nonsense, frankly I dont care =P) Its because I would like to play with friends who dont have same system as me
 

pwnzerstick

New member
Mar 25, 2009
592
0
0
Being primarily a PC player, I'm totaly for it, besides the fact that it means i'll be playing against controllers, I think it could also extend the life of a lot of games.
 

GeorgW

ALL GLORY TO ME!
Aug 27, 2010
4,806
0
0
As long as it's separated, since PC players have a huge advantage.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
I wouldn't want to see games allow cross platform to the point of allowing console players to play against PC players, but only because the difference in control schemes would cause balancing issues. From what I heard about Shadowrun, the devs specifically neutered the Mouse and Keyboard controls by adding some jerkiness to make them less accurate, while at the same time allowing autoaim on the console version -- and they did all that just to make it more balanced.

However, I see no reason not to allow PC gamers to play against Mac and, assuming there is a Linux version, Linux players, and I see absolutely no reason why PS3 players shouldn't be allowed to play against 360 players. Wii players may be on their own, since the hardware is different enough that it generally requires a rebuild of the game from the ground up, rather than a simple port. We already see quite a bit of cross platform play on the PC. There really isn't a way to tell the difference between Mac players and PC players on TF2, at least not since item trading made it so that anybody who wanted it could have a pair of earbuds, and most open source games, like Nexuiz, allow for players on Windows, Mac, and Linux to play together, with no obvious difference on the users end. I guess the real question here is "will the console manufacturers be willing to allow this to happen" more than "is it possible" or "should it happen?"
 

Dr_Steve_Brule

New member
Mar 28, 2010
170
0
0
I've heard about a game that tried that once, and apparently they never tried it again because the PC users wiped their ass with the competition.
 

thenumberthirteen

Unlucky for some
Dec 19, 2007
4,794
0
0
In theory its a good idea, but in practice it's hard to get Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo to see eye to eye. There are technical problems too. Plus if a PC is involved the Mouse + Keyboard is generally superior.
 
Nov 27, 2010
289
0
0
I would love that. I have a friend who has similar taste in games as I do, but owns an Xbox 360 and it would be awesome if we could play online together. Sadly this idea of cross-platform multiplayer goes against the mindset of Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo. They're more about one-upping each other than actually providing good content to the consumer.
 

Judgement101

New member
Mar 29, 2010
4,156
0
0
Oh boy, instead of calling people gay online over their playing skills, people would be calling eachother gay for playing the game on another console.
 

captaincabbage

New member
Apr 8, 2010
3,149
0
0
JourneyThroughHell said:
Eh. I don't know. I think that it's really about the controllers and I think that some controllers might be better suited for a certain game than others - giving some players a disadvantage.

But, hey, it's an alright idea - just not something console developers would want to do.
Maybe, but if you own the console and the game, you should be pretty damn efficient with that controller, so I don't think it would matter at all.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
Collaboration between the big three isn't going to happen.

PC might act as a sort of "Neutral Ground" between Sony or Microsoft, but beyond that this just isn't going to happen. Nintendo is just going to flat-out say "FUCK NO". Their network can't handle the extra data, and their console is a total joke compared to the others technologically speaking.
That, and Nintendo has an "isolationist/anti-stalking" philosophy going on: Their "Friend Codes". That shit just won't fly in any matchmaking environment.

So for the sake of the argument, lets assume Nintendo doesn't exist.

Microsoft and Sony want to keep you in their territory for any number of reasons, the main one being that if a game becomes popular on one console for its multiplayer, more customers will migrate to the popular console/network. Since no sane customer is going to buy two copies of the same game (one for each console) we can assume the gamesw are mutually exclusive.

That means more royalties for their company, and (more importantly) less for their competition.
 

JourneyThroughHell

New member
Sep 21, 2009
5,010
0
0
captaincabbage said:
JourneyThroughHell said:
Eh. I don't know. I think that it's really about the controllers and I think that some controllers might be better suited for a certain game than others - giving some players a disadvantage.

But, hey, it's an alright idea - just not something console developers would want to do.
Maybe, but if you own the console and the game, you should be pretty damn efficient with that controller, so I don't think it would matter at all.
Sure... but I still think the controllers will make a noticeable difference.

Maybe that's just me.
 

Dana22

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,274
0
0
captaincabbage said:
JourneyThroughHell said:
Eh. I don't know. I think that it's really about the controllers and I think that some controllers might be better suited for a certain game than others - giving some players a disadvantage.

But, hey, it's an alright idea - just not something console developers would want to do.
Maybe, but if you own the console and the game, you should be pretty damn efficient with that controller, so I don't think it would matter at all.
That doesn't matter, certain controllers are still inferior when compared to others, simply because of technical limitations.
 

captaincabbage

New member
Apr 8, 2010
3,149
0
0
JourneyThroughHell said:
captaincabbage said:
JourneyThroughHell said:
Eh. I don't know. I think that it's really about the controllers and I think that some controllers might be better suited for a certain game than others - giving some players a disadvantage.

But, hey, it's an alright idea - just not something console developers would want to do.
Maybe, but if you own the console and the game, you should be pretty damn efficient with that controller, so I don't think it would matter at all.
Sure... but I still think the controllers will make a noticeable difference.

Maybe that's just me.
Sure, maybe.

What controller and games do you use? (if any)
 

captaincabbage

New member
Apr 8, 2010
3,149
0
0
Dana22 said:
captaincabbage said:
JourneyThroughHell said:
Eh. I don't know. I think that it's really about the controllers and I think that some controllers might be better suited for a certain game than others - giving some players a disadvantage.

But, hey, it's an alright idea - just not something console developers would want to do.
Maybe, but if you own the console and the game, you should be pretty damn efficient with that controller, so I don't think it would matter at all.
That doesn't matter, certain controllers are still inferior when compared to others, simply because of technical limitations.
Can you give me some examples?
 

JourneyThroughHell

New member
Sep 21, 2009
5,010
0
0
captaincabbage said:
Sure, maybe.

What controller and games do you use? (if any)
Well, erm, okay. I use the 360 controller for shooters (and, therefore, buy them for the 360), the PS3 one for driving games and the PC one for Steam games.

Eh. Really, I think that those forced to play, for example, Killzone 2 with the PS3 controller against someone playing it with the 360 one are in clear disadvantage.

Again, that's probably just me.
 

Magnatek

A Miserable Pile of Honesty
Jul 17, 2009
1,695
0
0
Atmos Duality said:
Collaboration between the big three isn't going to happen.

PC might act as a sort of "Neutral Ground" between Sony or Microsoft, but beyond that this just isn't going to happen. Nintendo is just going to flat-out say "FUCK NO". Their network can't handle the extra data, and their console is a total joke compared to the others technologically speaking.
That, and Nintendo has an "isolationist/anti-stalking" philosophy going on: Their "Friend Codes". That shit just won't fly in any matchmaking environment.

So for the sake of the argument, lets assume Nintendo doesn't exist.

Microsoft and Sony want to keep you in their territory for any number of reasons, the main one being that if a game becomes popular on one console for its multiplayer, more customers will migrate to the popular console/network. Since no sane customer is going to buy two copies of the same game (one for each console) we can assume the gamesw are mutually exclusive.

That means more royalties for their company, and (more importantly) less for their competition.
Actually...



Plus, when I played, it didn't require me to put in those "Friend Codes". Don't count them out yet.

OT: I'd actually like to see more of this happen. It'd be cool to kind of meld the gaming communities together.