AndyFromMonday said:
Liquid Paradox said:
I get pissed off listening to dumb ass liberals going off about child abuse like they knew what they were talking about..
Because the ammount of professionals that are against physically abusing your child do not matter in the larger picture, right?
Liquid Paradox said:
I am in school for child psychology, and I VERY strongly believe that a spanking is completely within acceptable bounds for discipline.
Which one? Also, giving that you reached this conclusion and you are in a school for "child psychology" I'm supposing you can at least bring some sort of argument to support this claim?
Liquid Paradox said:
I was spanked and it did me no harm
You were spanked for what? Not eating dinner? Not doing homework? Going outside? Specify please.
Liquid Paradox said:
My brother is a social deviant.
This has mostly to do with the social environment your brother grew up in as well as how his parents handled him. Not spanking your child does not mean letting your child do whatever the fuck he wants too which is something I think you actually believe. Whilst I harbor a "democracy" when it comes to raising children aka being open to them and treating them like equals others may go for other approaches.
Liquid Paradox said:
P.S. Not trying to say liberals are dumb asses... just that anti-spanking liberals are dumb asses.
Whoa! Liberals are SUCH MORONS! How dare they present arguments against physically abusing children! HOW FUCKING DARE THEY THOSE ASSHOLES!
Admittedly, I have worded my argument very badly. The main reason I rarely ever post on The Escapist, or anywhere really, is because I have a hard time conveying conveying what I actually mean to say in written format. That being said, after reading over my post, I can see that I came off as a bias prick, with no evidence to back himself up. So, please allow me to clarify a few points.
Liquid Paradox said:
I get pissed off listening to dumb ass liberals going off about child abuse like they knew what they were talking about..
Liquid Paradox said:
P.S. Not trying to say liberals are dumb asses... just that anti-spanking liberals are dumb asses.
ouch. ok. bad form. What I meant to say, was that I get pissed off specifically listening to people who go on about spanking without knowing what they are talking about; they simply jump on the "Spanking is bad" bandwagon because they are "liberal." Also, I should point out, "Conservatives" do the exact same thing, spouting off about how children need a good spanking, usually with a "My daddy kicked my ass all the time" thrown in there (and yes, this does make me seem a bit hypocritical considering my earlier post, but I'll get to that). So, it's not liberals that piss me off, and I apologize to anyone and everyone I offended by saying that.
Liquid Paradox said:
I am in school for child psychology, and I VERY strongly believe that a spanking is completely within acceptable bounds for discipline.
Another bad line. Quite frankly, the "I'm in school" or "I do this for a living" argument... really isn't an argument at all. What I was trying to do was place myself on a pedestal, because that's what people do, sometimes, when their caught up in a morality debate (or any debate, for that matter). This also served a secondary purpose, however; unlike the people I spoke about above, I actually have at least some idea of what I am talking about. (that is, unlike the "bandwagon" people)
As for the other half of that statement, when I say "Spanking is completely within acceptable bounds" what I should have said was "Moderate, controlled spanking is completely within acceptable bounds." I certainly am not talking about beating the hell out of kids, or whipping them with rulers or belts or wooden spoons. All It should take is one or two firm whacks with your hand, open fist, on the behind. Enough to sting, but not enough to actually hurt. Parents who can't control their anger while spanking their children should not be spanking their children.
Oh, and I attend the University of Toronto, and am just finished my second year. I wasn't specific about that because I used to frequent 4chan, and as such have developed an issue with divulging any personal information what so ever. Same reason why I don't use Facebook (well, one of the reasons).
Liquid Paradox said:
I was spanked and it did me no harm
Various reasons why I was spanked, but rest assured my parents never used spanking as an end all to bad behavior. For me, spankings were usually only the result of a particularly bad tantrum.
Anyway, remember earlier when I said I was technically being hypocritical? Shame on me. This argument is only valid to a biased point. However, it was included because during the bias fueled, irrational rage that had me fill out my earlier post, I did still remember the whole point of the thread, which was the poll at the beginning, to which the answer was yes.
Liquid Paradox said:
my 5 year old brother is growing up in the age of pussy parents, not allowed to be spanked, according to the law of my home country... and he is bad. Like, social deviant bad.
More unnecessary anger, for which I apologize. However, I wasn't kidding when I said my brother has serious problems with his attitude. Hitting, spitting, bouncing off the wall, disrupting his class, swearing (this one is new. I personally believe that there is nothing wrong with swearing, but my little brother does it BECAUSE my parents tell him not to, and that is what causes the problem), throwing killer tantrums, the whole nine yards. What's more, after my parents began implementing all kinds of new age remedies for child behavior, like changing his diet, rewarding good behavior, etc, he started acting much better at home. However... we have recently learned that this particular change in demeanor is an unexpectedly sophisticated ploy; He knows damn well that if he act's like a good boy all of a sudden, my parents will give him more goodies. Unfortunately, last week, my parents received a phone call from his school, saying that he has been even worse these past few weeks then usual. as a matter of fact, his school behavior got worse right around the time he started acting better at home, almost like he was making up for his good behavior.
Err... anyway, the point of this block of text is simply to point out that I am not suggesting hitting him to make him more social; just to explain that my parents have tried everything under the sun, save for a firm smack on the behind. I'm just worried that it may be too late in his development to start implementing spankings, since realistically, around 6 or so is when parents shouldn't need to spank their kinds anymore.
In conclusion, I am not trying to suggest that all children need to be spanked, nor am I trying to suggest that all spanking is good spanking. Every child is different, everyone knows this. Each child will respond differently to different types of discipline; some are more inclined to respond to a time out, while others will respond to physical punishment. There is no begin all and end all to properly raising children, despite what you might see on Super Nanny. The problem is that some people get caught up on words like "hitting" and immediately attribute those ideas to abuse. As these people become older, and more numerous, the legal line between Discipline and Abuse becomes blurry. Parents become afraid to punish their children less they face social scorn or legal reprisal. None of this is helped by cases such as the one described earlier in this thread by AndyFromMonday, where parental figures take the concept of Spanking too far, using it in every parenting situation, as an outlet for their own confused emotions. But, with a documented rise in Child Disobedience, and the understanding that not every parent is Super Nanny, we should ask our selves what is worse? Spanking our children, or coddling them when they misbehave?
Tl;Dr
Sorry for the angry post, however I am open to a civil debate.
Particularity sorry to AndyFromMonday and anyone else I may have offended.