I am getting both. This is about which one to get first (my funds are somewhat thinly-spread right now).Zhukov said:I find your poll woefully lacking in the "both" department.
Which is a tad sad. Because while I like bethesda and all, this isn't the sort of game they have madea lot of. But arkane studios on the otherhand: arx fatalis and dark messiah....very similar in some ways.daveman247 said:A lot of people seem to be making this mistake. Dishonored aint being made by bethesda, only published.NEDM said:XCOM
1) It's a kind of game I like, and wish there were more of.
2) The people who make it seem to genuinely enjoy it and want others to as well
3) As a PS3 owner I have zero faith that dishonored won't be a horrid, buggy, unsupported POS port from my good friends at bethesda.
That was of the greatest sync kills I have ever seen.Bvenged said:I don't know too much about Xcom, but is does look like a fun hardcore tactical game, might pick it up when it's cheaper. For now, however, I can't wait to get my hands on Dishonored.
![]()
Which is a tad sad. Because while I like bethesda and all, this isn't the sort of game they have madea lot of. But arkane studios on the otherhand: arx fatalis and dark messiah....very similar in some ways.lord Claincy Ffnord said:A lot of people seem to be making this mistake. Dishonored aint being made by bethesda, only published.
^^BreakfastMan said:![]()
At least, I will be getting both on launch day. Both look excellent and I actually can afford it, so why the hell not?![]()
From the one review I have read, one playthrough of X-com clocks in at about 20 hours. I dunno about you, but that sounds like a good amount of time to me.VoidWanderer said:^^BreakfastMan said:![]()
At least, I will be getting both on launch day. Both look excellent and I actually can afford it, so why the hell not?![]()
But I am probably going to finish Dishonored first...
But if X-Com is as short as I fear...
20 hours?BreakfastMan said:From the one review I have read, one playthrough of X-com clocks in at about 20 hours. I dunno about you, but that sounds like a good amount of time to me.VoidWanderer said:^^BreakfastMan said:![]()
At least, I will be getting both on launch day. Both look excellent and I actually can afford it, so why the hell not?![]()
But I am probably going to finish Dishonored first...
But if X-Com is as short as I fear...![]()
And I think there is a mode that just keeps going until you lose, kinda like a survival one too. So that could be even longer.VoidWanderer said:20 hours?BreakfastMan said:From the one review I have read, one playthrough of X-com clocks in at about 20 hours. I dunno about you, but that sounds like a good amount of time to me.VoidWanderer said:^^BreakfastMan said:![]()
At least, I will be getting both on launch day. Both look excellent and I actually can afford it, so why the hell not?![]()
But I am probably going to finish Dishonored first...
But if X-Com is as short as I fear...![]()
Wahoo!!!!!
I feel so bad for Arkane Studios, 2 days until release and people still don't know Bethesda only published the gameArdure said:X-COM ... I find Bethesda games to lack character depth when it comes to an RPG but that's just me. Strategy games I find tend to have more play and re-play value I find.
I found that your avatar suited this post a lot.ZombieMonkey7 said:I feel so bad for Arkane Studios, 2 days until release and people still don't know Bethesda only published the gameArdure said:X-COM ... I find Bethesda games to lack character depth when it comes to an RPG but that's just me. Strategy games I find tend to have more play and re-play value I find.
First person platforming and stealth can be done right. See: Mirror's Edge and Thief.Kopikatsu said:I say go with XCOM.
First person platforming and stealth in the same game? Haha, NO. First person is only good for shooters and adventure games that involve little to no platforming. That is it.
I've played both of those games, and I disagree with you that they were done well. Actually, those two games were the ones that put me off both of those subgenres altogether. (Well, not entirely true. Half-Life is the game that made me despise FPP, but Mirror's Edge brought that nightmare back to haunt me)Packie_J said:First person platforming and stealth can be done right. See: Mirror's Edge and Thief.Kopikatsu said:I say go with XCOM.
First person platforming and stealth in the same game? Haha, NO. First person is only good for shooters and adventure games that involve little to no platforming. That is it.
Oh well, let's just say that I disagree with you. Mirror's Edge made me fall in love with the idea and feeling of first person platforming and no game have come close ever since. I'm actually surprised that you were put off by thief since that game had an excellent implementation of stealth in the first-person(thanks to the light/dark meter).Kopikatsu said:I've played both of those games, and I disagree with you that they were done well. Actually, those two games were the ones that put me off both of those subgenres altogether. (Well, not entirely true. Half-Life is the game that made me despise FPP, but Mirror's Edge brought that nightmare back to haunt me)Packie_J said:First person platforming and stealth can be done right. See: Mirror's Edge and Thief.Kopikatsu said:I say go with XCOM.
First person platforming and stealth in the same game? Haha, NO. First person is only good for shooters and adventure games that involve little to no platforming. That is it.