I know you're joking, but let me clarify, if people are average, run of the mill, they are not unique, they are really just clones of one another, and thus pathetic. My understanding of this "elitist" term is that it is one who considers himself superior to others. News flash, people aren't equal. Don't tell me that I am equal to the people who would mindlessly start chanting U.S.A. whenever Sarah Palin said something even slightly emotional. People are not equal, that can be seen in the classroom. However, I only consider myself superior to one who might call me a "nerd" or something of that nature. Someone who is trying to better themselves as am I, and has respect for others, and doesn't make graffiti, I consider equal to me even if they are not as intelligent or even as strong as me. I could go on for a long time, but I would rather not.TheLoveRat said:ELITIST ALERT!!! ELITIST ALERT!!!Lonan said:Any society where there is an average person is a pathetic one.
(jokes)!
It's not really 'directed' at anyone per se. It's just a little waver saying that a % of people here who think they are 'above average' without any proof may be oblivious to the fact that they actually aren't. Not meant to be insulting or anything, just fact ;PDatalord said:Is this directed at ordinary people or people here who claim to be smart?antipunt said:Just to a throw a silly note out there, psychological-studies show that most people assume they are far more intelligent than they really are. This is why you need tests.
In one case, some guy ran into a bank and tried to rob it with lemon juice on his face. when he was caught, he exclaimed "BUT I HAD LEMON JUICE! Why didn't it work?!"
It's called metacognitive awareness. The dumber you are, the more likely you are likely to (falsely) assume you are more intelligent than the average person. It's a psychological effect: it's not surprisingly that so many humans want to be considered 'special'
I knows I's is smart, I was a freshman qualifyer for USAMO, an in middle school i went to national mathcounts, I was recommended by teachers two go to NYLF on medicine and NYLF on national security, and if i wanted to, with all my AP credits i could skip a year or two of college. (there's other stuff but that should be enuff)
This ladies and gentlemen is what I call an epic-ass whooping...Ultrajoe said:Intelligence is not just what you know, it's what you don't know. It's context, ability and experience as well as know-how. You may be the best in all of your subjects at high-school, but life has so many lessons to teach that we can never grasp them all. To say you are more intelligent based on your scores in a test displays a saddening lack of intelligence.
I've currently a 4.2 GPA, and I can tell you without a doubt that there is little, if any, correlation between grades and intelligence.Seldon2639 said:Does it count that I noticed that "similar" should only be spelled with one "l"?
I am curious, though. Does anyone who has actually done well in school (or isn't defending people who haven't done well) say things like "academic ability does not equal intelligence"? I'm not saying the two are inextricably linked, but there's a pretty strong correlation in all the research I've seen on the subject. So, do people who actually did well in school and don't have a sibling/child/friend/whatever they're defending not conflate intelligence and success?
I did well at school (was moved ahead two years, got straight As and A*s at GCSE, got straight As at A-Level), and whilst it would be wrong to say there is NO correlation between academic achievement and intelligence, I'd consider it an unreliable measure. Yes, it's pretty rare for an intelligent person to do very poorly in exams (because basic intelligence can get you by in a lot of tests regardless of how little you might know factually), but it's not hard for an unintelligent person to do very well. Therefore, academic success is certainly not conclusive proof of a person's intelligence, though I concede the point that it can serve as an indicator.Seldon2639 said:I am curious, though. Does anyone who has actually done well in school (or isn't defending people who haven't done well) say things like "academic ability does not equal intelligence"? I'm not saying the two are inextricably linked, but there's a pretty strong correlation in all the research I've seen on the subject. So, do people who actually did well in school and don't have a sibling/child/friend/whatever they're defending not conflate intelligence and success?