For your first two assumptions, that's almost what I was going for. 100% on the pro-gay rights, but I have the tendency to assume if some people handle things a certain way, other people in a similar situation might handle things in a similar way. To be more specific: I lurk on forums and read someone discussing, say, women's rights (it happens on this site a lot and is a topic I care about a lot, so lurk happens a lot). Eventually someone will say something like "I think women should have all of the rights, but I think they should stop doing x, y, and z." or something like that. Someone else will point out that they don't have much say in the matter, since the first person isn't female. Whether or not that first guy had a good point is immaterial, since he's usually coming in to the situation not understanding the issue and leaving the situation not understanding the issue, but now slightly more pissed at feminists. My worry is that I don't understand shit and, should I say something, would just label myself as someone who doesn't understand shit and who is undeserving of the time it takes to be educated on whatever it is I don't understand (and, with the sheer quantity of people who live their lives unwilling to listen to another point of view and TRY to understand it, I honestly couldn't blame anyone for not wanting to try and teach me, the 100jillionth straight person who didn't understand shit). Whether or not I actually do this around my friends, I'll probably never truly know. Paranoia plus people's normal adherence to not wanting to get in arguments (as in, no one is going to tell me I have a problem when it's way easier to gripe about me to someone else) do not make a good combo. Really, I'm not going around and expressing strong opinions around LGBT people, because I worry I don't actually know anything.bananafishtoday said:OT: No, but I'm bi, so (insert joke about hypocrisy.)
Also, all y'all saying things like "No, except for the really *~*~fruity*~*~ gays," oh puh-leeze. Grow up.
(I assume you mean pro- rather than anti-gay rights when you say you have "really strong opinions." Also I assume you mean "a lot of people" = LGBT folks. Honestly, if straight/cis people are criticizing you for standing up for gay/trans rights, they almost never have a legitimate issue.)Catrixa said:Lots of stuff I said.
W/r/t "shouldn't have a say in it," I think the main thing to be aware of is whether you're unintentionally crowding out other voices or steering the conversation toward yourself. Heavy emphasis on "unintentionally"... I don't doubt that your heart's in the right place, and having struggled with a lot of self-confidence/social anxiety issues in the past myself, I can empathize with where you're coming from on that front.
There are some people in any circle meant for marginalized groups (women, PoC, LGBT, etc) who would prefer to completely exclude people from outside their group. Outsiders should respect their view if that's the case. But they're almost always a very small minority within their circle. The issue with straight/cis folks in LGBT circles (or men in feminist spaces, or white folks in PoC spaces) is often that some of them tend to dominate conversations, speak when they should listen, or assume their viewpoints are as valid or important as those from members of the marginalized group.
(Really, that last one is usually the biggest sticking point among well-meaning pro-equality people. In an LGBT space, straight/cis voices are not as important. The reason these spaces exist is because LGBT voices are constantly and systematically excluded from popular discourse in general society. It would be wonderful if everyone had an equal say regardless of identity, but that just isn't world we live in.)
Anyway... I'm not saying you necessarily do any of this, just trying to explain what might be causing they reaction you say you get. Most of us would love to have more straight folks on our side and understanding our concerns. We're just sensitive to when people from the mainstream identity... miss the point, basically.
Also I feel like a lot of what I thought of as "over-analyzing" in the past was basically... trying to do analysis without much data, to make a crude analogy. "Accidentally saying something offensive" typically comes from just not understanding why certain things may cause offense. I know it can be tough when confronted because I'm sure you didn't mean any harm, but it's really important to try and become educated on the issues. (Speaking from experience, it's a huge confidence-booster in the social skills dept to be able to judge how people might react to the things you say.)
As far as accidentally saying something offensive: I have a lot of different groups of friends and sometimes I pick up stuff I really shouldn't. I had a gay friend point out that I used "omg, that's gay," a lot, but he didn't mind because people just do that. But I know I shouldn't "just do that," it's just a bad habit. It doesn't mean it doesn't hurt when I do it, though. I guess... bad habits are bad habits, but I don't think someone else should have to endure mine, so I worry I'll do it when I'm trying not to.
50% of my discomfort comes from me trying to not exercise privilege (and, quite possibly not succeeding). The other 50% is probably me needing a psychiatrist (seriously, I can over-analyze over-analyzations until I come to the conclusion that everyone hates me and everything is my fault. Except WWII, 'cause I think one of my friends has that one).