rezboyjoey said:No, it is the perfect annalogy to prove my point. Its calculus logic. For something to be proven true it must be correct 100% of the time, for something to be false it only needs to be disproved once. I went with an extreme example that effectively disproved Wordsmith's.Angerwing said:That's a terrible analogy.
A) You're implying that people who disagree with you are mentally ill. (I know you're not, but think about it) and,
B) Maybe if you're in a room with 499 mental patients, you shouldn't start telling them their delusion is WRONG.
A) You're contradicting yourself here first of all. Second I don't think they're mentally ill I think they're wrong. Thats why I dissagree with them
B) This might be true but the example was theoretical not advice to be taken literally in practice.
And what if you ARE the groundbreaking genious? Wasn't Galileo Galili killed becaue he was the one person who thought the earth revolved around the sun? And the funny thing is he was right!
You said:For something to be proven true it must be correct 100% of the time.
Who said anything was to be proven true? We're talking about opinions. Saying something like "Modern Warfare is a bad game" is purely opinion. We're not talking about quantifiable situations like Galileo. What Wordsmith is saying is that your single opinion is not more important than anyone else's. He's not even saying you're flat out wrong.Wordsmith said:I beg to differ. In a room of with 499 people who disagree with you, the best thing to do is either leave the room or keep your view to yourself. There's probably a reason why you're the only one who fields a certain view, and it's probably not because you're such a groundbreaking genius that no-one else has ever thought about it before...
Yes, I understand the conformity test, hell, I've studied it. Your analogy IS crap.