I don't worship any gods in real life, because to the best of humanity's knowledge there is no objective evidence for the existence of any. (Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, principle of maximum parsimony, etc., etc., this isn't the place for that debate.) That said, I think it's absurd to do as a few people seem to have done in this thread (though I admit I didn't read the whole thing in detail) and go "NO THERE CAN NEVER BE ANY GODS IN ANY UNIVERSES EVER" (especially if they prefix this with "I'M A CHRISTIAN/HINDU/MUSLIM/JEW/BANANA, SO").
Take the Pokémon universe, and in particular Arceus. It wields sufficient command over the Unown to create beings which hold dominion over time, space and antimatter, and there is folkloric data suggesting that it is the force that created the universe. Personally, I fail to see how Arceus can be interpreted in any way other than as a god (albeit an interesting one since it's divided in two - Arceus has cognition but no agency, while the Unown have agency but no cognition).
I'm not about to WORSHIP Arceus - that would be as absurd that marrying a wall hanging of Chun-Li - but I don't see why we shouldn't take the author telling us in no uncertain terms that this is the First Mover at face value.