Solo508 said:
What kind of sadist wouldn't tell their children that santa is real? Let them have a magical imagination while they still can. They figure it out in the end anyway. Didn't we all?
See, this is what I want to know. How do you think that it is "good" to lie to your kids for some of the most important time of their lives, only for them to learn in the end that Mommy and Daddy are big fat liers and should not be trusted? I know that when I learned that Santa wasn't real, I was more then a little pissed. I fail to see how trusting my ability to teach my kids right and wrong without needing to depend on some made up figure, or trusting in them to be able to do good or have an imagination by themselves without needing to believe in something that isn't real, is bad.
Don't get me wrong, it's not like I'm laugh in some kids face if he talks about Santa, nor will I say to my kids "Santa isn't real, and if you think he is then
choke and die!". But at the same time I'm not going to give them (any more) reason to hate me when they get older by lying through my teeth about something that I don't think they need.
And, really, it's not like you
need Santa in your life to turn out ok. Plenty of kids turn out fine without thinking some fat dude breaks into their house every year and will give them coal for being bad. You can have fantasy, wonder, and imagination while still knowing that it's not really real.
But hey, like I said before, I'm no shrink and I have no clue which option is better for the kid. If you tell them there is a Santa, I'm not gonna shit on your candycane. For all I know having Santa is actually good for them. All I'm saying is that there is more then one option, and I have mine picked out.