As a newly turned 18 year old gamer, my pet peeve is the exact opposite of yours.
You see, the whole restriction system wasn't put there soley to piss you off, heck, over here in good old brittania we have about 3 interchangeable ratings services, which gets weird.
Anyway, the point i'm going to get to is that the ratings protect 3 people: 1. The developers/publishers of the game: they can't be fairly held accountable if someone far too young to play their game does something stupid after playing it. 2. The shop selling the game, they check for id, they don't get a huge fine (both for the shop and the person selling the game) 3. most importantly, YOU / the gamer public: I hope for reasonably obvious reasons.
Without the ratings system, we probably would have lost gaming to the likes of Mr. thompson years ago.
You see, the whole restriction system wasn't put there soley to piss you off, heck, over here in good old brittania we have about 3 interchangeable ratings services, which gets weird.
Anyway, the point i'm going to get to is that the ratings protect 3 people: 1. The developers/publishers of the game: they can't be fairly held accountable if someone far too young to play their game does something stupid after playing it. 2. The shop selling the game, they check for id, they don't get a huge fine (both for the shop and the person selling the game) 3. most importantly, YOU / the gamer public: I hope for reasonably obvious reasons.
Without the ratings system, we probably would have lost gaming to the likes of Mr. thompson years ago.