graphics looks so bad otherwise it looks funbaddude1337 said:I'm looking forward to Strafe more than anything. The alpha demo was pretty good fun. Sadly won't be done until 2017:
Shadow Warrior 1 remake was fun, so that might be decent. I'm honestly not at all blown away by Doom. I was wary of it from the first reveal when people in the audience were shouting and going crazy over 'meh' kill animations.
Right now I have more fun with Doom mods more than anything that's coming out, specifically Project Brutality.
I debated whether it was even worth responding to this. Technically, claiming that Medal of Honour is terrible isn't wrong, just a statement of opinion, but I assume that it's an opinion that comes from having played most, if not all of them. But frankly, can't agree. I hold Frontline and Pacific Assault above Allied Assault, and I've never played a MoH game that was below average.B-Cell said:The only decent MOH game was allied assault and that was also average game. series as whole is terrible. COD1 and 2 were only good COD games i agree. dont care about battlefield.Hawki said:Yeah...no. Medal of Honour, Battlefield, and Call of Duty say hello.
the best WW2 shooter is RTCW. thats count as WW2 even its more of science fiction.
I prefer lone character shooting thousands of enemies, demons, monsters etc then group of squad fighting a war.
I think at the time I was spending all my time on Allied Assault and overlooked Frontline. I think I also was confused and thought Frontline was just Allied Assault on console. When I eventually became interested, I wasn't able to find the game. When I did find the game, I couldn't find my GameCube...Yeah, that game's gotten really unlucky in terms of me being able to play it.Hawki said:Oi, where's Frontline ya bastard?!MysticSlayer said:And now I'm getting nostalgic. Among Allied Assaults, Pacific Assault, the WWII CoD games, and BF1942, WWII shooters were responsible for some of my favorite shooters of all time!![]()
Bad graphics how? From a technical standpoint, I suppose, yes. But that's the point. It's going for a mid 90's early 3d retro look ala Quake 1. I personally think the art style is great.B-Cell said:graphics looks so bad otherwise it looks fun
I'll actually second the graphics issue, but not so much that they look bad. What's jarring to me is how primitive the enemies look, yet how detailed the blood looks.baddude1337 said:Bad graphics how? From a technical standpoint, I suppose, yes. But that's the point. It's going for a mid 90's early 3d retro look ala Quake 1. I personally think the art style is great.B-Cell said:graphics looks so bad otherwise it looks fun
In terms of gameplay, it does seem to be going for a Brutal Doom kind of thing, which I'm fine with. As Doom mods are badass:
If I had a decent new IP for every time I've said that, or heard someone say that... *sigh*Serio said:I have no clue what "Inner Chains" is, but I doubt DOOM will take the crown. Shadow Warrior 2 doesn't look particularly great either; the first game was popular because it felt like it did everything it set out to do. It gave you a bunch of fun weapons, a nice set of environments and a story you didn't really need to pay attention to. I didn't expect a sequel. I'd rather have the developers turn to new pastures.