Nieroshai said:
First, you probably hurt her, and that's a bad thing.
Why is that bad? People get hurt, it happens. Someone else is usually the cause of that, it happens. It's not like he's doing it out of some sick form of enjoyment or anything like that.
Should he have stayed with her then even though he didn't want to?
There's the hurts we can avoid and the hurts we can't. This is a hurt that couldn't be avoided, it's not a bad thing. It's just part of life.
Second, you left her solely for someone prettier. Rebuttal to point 2: that's not necessarily a bad thing if no one was hurt.
He didn't.
132635 said:
I was just more attracted to her, and generally happier when I was with her.
He left her for someone he was more attracted to (which need not be, and usually isn't, based solely on looks) and who made him happier (which rarely is based solely on looks).
Third, no one can say what you did was "right." At best, what you did was morally gray.
What he did was perfectly morally white.
He was honest, true to himself and respectful as can be to all parties involved. He's also still in school and thus likely young and inexperienced.
Now, since this is a forum, my personal bias. You do not specify if sex was involved, but it can be assumed. That being said, I find it morally repugnant when someone is just fine with casually leaving someone you convinced to give you the most personal thing that can be given.
I say I cannot decide simply because I acknowledge I don't have the whole story.
Sex is hardly the most personal thing that can be given.
Sex is whatever the two parties involved want it to be. If they both want it to be a casual thing then that's what it is. If they both want it to be the most personal thing that can be given then that's what it is. You do not get to decide what role sex takes in another person's life.