For me, it is a very sad day.
This is NOT about the ending. That would make a less depressing topic. I have just seen that some 'genius' at either EA or Bioware (my guess is EA) who is over-saturating us gamers with ME3 multiplayer DLC. And I hate it.
I will make my position clear. I am not a fan of Multiplayer. I will never play Modern Warfare or Battlefield games in online multiplayer. I am not a fan of running around trying to be top dog. It is stupid and most people you play with online, you end up WANTING to shoot, as people have actually done in the past.
But... I did play the ME3 multiplayer when I downloaded the demo, and LOVED it. It was a great co-op experience and I wanted to keep playing. Then I noticed the retarded number of ways you can get multiplayer DLC for it. Armour casing for your console, Action figures, and now books! The game that would've set me on the path of multiplayer fun has poisoned it.
While I would LOVE to boycott which ever company came up with this draconian marketing methods, I thought about it for a moment...
Who is at fault? Is it Bioware, the people who get funded by EA? EA, a company who have brought about questionable marketing practices lately? What about the multiplayer fans who did get involved with the DLC debaucle of MW and BF, could we blame them?
Or, is it us. Do we gamers take responsibility for getting so fanatical about games that we will buy anything with that games name on it? WoW has it's trading card game, where you can actually get items for your character, and I am sure there are other examples out there.
To me, after thinking about it... EA. I would like to say Bioware, but I think EA is more at fault with the situation we have here. They would have the power to get Bioware to jump through their fiery of hoop of "Do it or else".
What do you guys think? And what should we do about it?
Me, My ME3 Collectors Edition will most likely collect dust.
This is NOT about the ending. That would make a less depressing topic. I have just seen that some 'genius' at either EA or Bioware (my guess is EA) who is over-saturating us gamers with ME3 multiplayer DLC. And I hate it.
I will make my position clear. I am not a fan of Multiplayer. I will never play Modern Warfare or Battlefield games in online multiplayer. I am not a fan of running around trying to be top dog. It is stupid and most people you play with online, you end up WANTING to shoot, as people have actually done in the past.
But... I did play the ME3 multiplayer when I downloaded the demo, and LOVED it. It was a great co-op experience and I wanted to keep playing. Then I noticed the retarded number of ways you can get multiplayer DLC for it. Armour casing for your console, Action figures, and now books! The game that would've set me on the path of multiplayer fun has poisoned it.
While I would LOVE to boycott which ever company came up with this draconian marketing methods, I thought about it for a moment...
Who is at fault? Is it Bioware, the people who get funded by EA? EA, a company who have brought about questionable marketing practices lately? What about the multiplayer fans who did get involved with the DLC debaucle of MW and BF, could we blame them?
Or, is it us. Do we gamers take responsibility for getting so fanatical about games that we will buy anything with that games name on it? WoW has it's trading card game, where you can actually get items for your character, and I am sure there are other examples out there.
To me, after thinking about it... EA. I would like to say Bioware, but I think EA is more at fault with the situation we have here. They would have the power to get Bioware to jump through their fiery of hoop of "Do it or else".
What do you guys think? And what should we do about it?
Me, My ME3 Collectors Edition will most likely collect dust.