Ah dear. This is why I am unwilling to use that word. It always gets people's hackles up.Ultratwinkie said:How is it "deep?"Zhukov said:[snip]
Well, like I just said, I'd say this...
... constitutes depth of character. At least enough to satisfy me. If you disagree, then so be it.Going from naiveté, optimism and a simple desire to escape and see the world, to a quest for the truth her own identity and eventual transcendence. Her arc is mirrored by the way her relationship with Booker develops. To begin with she wants to make him out as a heroic rescuer, and shrugs of his denials that he's anything of the kind. Then she realises he's almost as bad as he thinks he is. Over time she come to respect him and, eventually to simply understand him.
No, I guess it's not a true-to-life depiction of what spending one's youth in isolation would do to a person. Then again, that's not what it's trying to be.Its a sheltered girl who, for some reason, doesn't have the full effect of social isolation (most likely solitary confinement like conditions) for a person's entire life if she did stay in that tower for all of her life. A point I don't think Bioshock ever covered.
Also, I'm not sure if she was kept in 100% solitary confinement the whole time.
...
Y'know, it's funny. Usually at this point I would be getting a bit annoyed with your tone. However, Bioshock Infinite was so damn brilliant that I don't feel my usual fanboyish impulse to defend it.
It's quite the glorious feeling. Almost zen.