maybe if it was /b/?Guitarmasterx7 said:I saw a thread where it was like "what do you do on the toilet" and someone was suspended for posting "I read" because it was a "low content post." Do we really need or want to know more than that?
Diagonal Horizontality said:You have a strange definition of civility...Sevre90210 said:Good job for keeping this thread civil though.
[small]Although, I suppose, this thread does contain a comparatively small amount of causticity when accounting for other times in which users have discussed the moderation system.[/small]
OT:
![]()
And yet,
But really, there is only one thing I can say with absolute certainty about moderation: there are [a href=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.182717.5446011]two[/a] [a href=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.182717.5448253]sides[/a] to every incident, and I am always disinclined to take a user's version of events at face value.[/quote]
Considering every other thread I've seen discussing moderation needed a quarantine I consider this a success. People actually seem to be learning from their mistakes. It's amazing! Although some people really need to understand that every time they've incurred mod wrath, it's because they've offended [b]users[/b] with their posting habits. I just do the dirty work,
That's to do with low content. You need to say more than just "lol" - it adds nothing to the thread at all.Easy Street said:And I got a warning because I said "lol" as a response to a picture someone posted. Hrmm..
Diagonal Horizontality said:![]()
And yet, [/QUOTE]
But how???!!!
Does that mean I still have a shot?
Do you think "lol" is needed on a thread? You can laugh privately, or send a PM to the poster so that they know you found it funny, if that's what you wanted to show.Easy Street said:And sometimes a one-word comment is all that is needed. Taken in context it was just fine. I see MANY one or two word answers in threads, especially if the thread topic only really requires such. In fact, when I got the warning, I pasted a link to a 4 page thread full of one word answers (I was digging to find it, but after page 15 I gave up) as an example.Lord Mountbatten Reborn said:That's to do with low content. You need to say more than just "lol" - it adds nothing to the thread at all.Easy Street said:And I got a warning because I said "lol" as a response to a picture someone posted. Hrmm..
OT: I once got put on probation for saying that every Wii/DS game I'd ever played had been "lessons in mediocrity". The probation didn't last between my periods of activity, so all that happened was I was temporarily confused at having a non-existent probation.
Before anyone might get angry over my harsh words, I have repented my sins, and like the Professor Layton game.
How do I do that?FargoDog said:Yup, I got put on probation for trying to be a smart-ass. And then acted like a smart-ass during that probation and got suspended.
They were both deserved though, so I don't really mind.
If you're really upset about it, you could PM Kuliani. He'll probably give you a better explanation of the reason you were put on probation.
You sir, are an inspiration to rebellions everwhere.Muzza-Maaate said:I deserve it all. But sometimes I get bored and trolling is fun.
Warning Details
Post: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.158631.3959949
Reason: Do not troll the forums. Please read the Posting Guidelines.
Suspension Details
Duration: 3 days
Post: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.159043.3982104
Reason: More trolling, and inappropriate content.
If you would like to dispute this suspension, please use our contact form.
Suspension Details
Duration: 7 days
Post: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.159043.3982104
Reason: Ban upgraded.
If you would like to dispute this suspension, please use our contact form.
Warning Details
Post: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.172574.4794835
Reason: Don\'t link to things like this, please.
Suspension Details
Duration: 3 days
Post: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.172574.4794835
Reason: Don\'t link to shock images.
If you would like to dispute this suspension, please use our contact form.
Probation Details
Duration: 3 days
Post: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.202296.6722697
Reason: Inappropreate content.
Suspension Details
Duration: 14 days
Post: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.204370.6860376
Reason: Trolling the forums. Multiple warnings.
If you would like to dispute this suspension, please use our contact form.
Warning Details
Post: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.215379.7273043
Reason: Be careful about using the KKK in any jokes. Just a warning...
Suspension Details
Duration: 7 days
Post: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.214847.7272983
Reason: Trolling the forums. Again.
If you would like to dispute this suspension, please use our contact form.
I'll probably get suspended for this post.
I too stop before pressing post and I think about the possibility of someone getting offended by what I wrote.Marter said:I hope I never get any either. Doubt I will though. I'm usually pretty nice, and I think out what I say before I press "post".
This can indeed be vouched for. The number of times that users have flat-out claimed that the moderators show favoritism or don't do their jobs right/at all, either on posts here or elsewhere, is absolutely staggering. When said person then gets punished for either that action or a different one later, they act like that only proves their point. SO many others think that they could do the mods' job better, but they're the same people I feel would be just as "power-hungry" as they accuse others of being.Diagonal Horizontality said:But really, there is only one thing I can say with absolute certainty about moderation: there are [a href=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.182717.5446011]two[/a] [a href=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.182717.5448253]sides[/a] to every incident, and I am always disinclined to take a user's version of events at face value.
The succinctness of "lol" on its own is something I always appreciate. I now know that someone using it has a sense of humour and adds to discussions with their infectious mirth, which is a fine substitute for all that droll contributing.Easy Street said:I think being able to robotically parrot the same point is a wonder gift. Really, I do.Being able to robotically parrot the "low content" defense is an admirable gift. Really, it is.Lord Mountbatten Reborn said:Do you think "lol" is needed on a thread? You can laugh privately, or send a PM to the poster so that they know you found it funny, if that's what you wanted to show.Easy Street said:And sometimes a one-word comment is all that is needed. Taken in context it was just fine. I see MANY one or two word answers in threads, especially if the thread topic only really requires such. In fact, when I got the warning, I pasted a link to a 4 page thread full of one word answers (I was digging to find it, but after page 15 I gave up) as an example.Lord Mountbatten Reborn said:That's to do with low content. You need to say more than just "lol" - it adds nothing to the thread at all.Easy Street said:And I got a warning because I said "lol" as a response to a picture someone posted. Hrmm..
OT: I once got put on probation for saying that every Wii/DS game I'd ever played had been "lessons in mediocrity". The probation didn't last between my periods of activity, so all that happened was I was temporarily confused at having a non-existent probation.
Before anyone might get angry over my harsh words, I have repented my sins, and like the Professor Layton game.
If the thread topic seems to require one or two word answers, I elaborate on the answer. People understand the reasoning behind the answer then, and then there's no chance of a low content warning. It also promotes discussion once your reasoning is known.
I'd assume most of those people posting one-word answers got a warning as well.
However, since I think the average cognitive level of the forum members allow them to appreciate the succintness of a one-word answer, or an answer that does not unduly elaborate a point that could have been made in a much shorter fashion, various answer lengths (if contextually appropriate) should be acceptable.
Its ok to take the blinders off.