Poll: Fallout 3, New Vegas, or Oblivion?

Recommended Videos

Keall

New member
Jul 5, 2010
21
0
0
Jaranja said:
Keall said:
Jaranja said:
Vkmies said:
Why is this not Fallout 1, Fallout 2 or Morrowind?
Keall said:
Vkmies said:
Why is this not Fallout 1, Fallout 2 or Morrowind?
this
Because that is not the question the OP wanted to ask?

It's simple, really. You didn't need to ask the question, you trolls.
The point being, if you're going to choose 2 games from one series, and the last game of another series, none of which were anywhere near as good as the previous games in those series, you should probably include the games that were actually really, really good. Fallout 1 and 2 were great games. Morrowind was an awesome game. Oblivion was good, Fallout 3 was disappointing to the point where I refuse to play NV.

I fail to see how this makes me a troll.
Because your way of thinking is completely different the the OP's. Maybe he didn't play the games you mentioned. He's asking that question, you can't say that he should be asking a completely different question that would yield completely different answers. Just shush.
I misread the original post. I thought he said to include them. No, I don't think the poster should change the question completely, however, I feel it would be... more fair if the OP had at least given more examples. Oblivion and Fallout 3 are not the best examples of the Elder Scrolls and Fallout, respectively. Granted, Oblivion was much better than Fallout 3 in respect to how it played to it's predecessors. Does that mean Fallout 3 is a bad game? Not at all. I, personally, didn't like it, but I can see why others did. Yes, the question would probably yield completely different answers, had he chosen to include the games that made Oblivion and Fallout 3/NV possible, I will admit that.
 

Jaranja

New member
Jul 16, 2009
3,275
0
0
Keall said:
Jaranja said:
Keall said:
Jaranja said:
Vkmies said:
Why is this not Fallout 1, Fallout 2 or Morrowind?
Keall said:
Vkmies said:
Why is this not Fallout 1, Fallout 2 or Morrowind?
this
Because that is not the question the OP wanted to ask?

It's simple, really. You didn't need to ask the question, you trolls.
The point being, if you're going to choose 2 games from one series, and the last game of another series, none of which were anywhere near as good as the previous games in those series, you should probably include the games that were actually really, really good. Fallout 1 and 2 were great games. Morrowind was an awesome game. Oblivion was good, Fallout 3 was disappointing to the point where I refuse to play NV.

I fail to see how this makes me a troll.
Because your way of thinking is completely different the the OP's. Maybe he didn't play the games you mentioned. He's asking that question, you can't say that he should be asking a completely different question that would yield completely different answers. Just shush.
I misread the original post. I thought he said to include them. No, I don't think the poster should change the question completely, however, I feel it would be... more fair if the OP had at least given more examples. Oblivion and Fallout 3 are not the best examples of the Elder Scrolls and Fallout, respectively. Granted, Oblivion was much better than Fallout 3 in respect to how it played to it's predecessors. Does that mean Fallout 3 is a bad game? Not at all. I, personally, didn't like it, but I can see why others did. Yes, the question would probably yield completely different answers, had he chosen to include the games that made Oblivion and Fallout 3/NV possible, I will admit that.
Alright, I'll let you off this time.

I thought Fallout 3 was amazing and I thought Oblivion was... Alright. Not good but not bad.

I need to play the original Fallout series but just haven't got around to it yet.
 

supermariner

New member
Aug 27, 2010
808
0
0
when i first bought New Vegas and instantly sunk a few days worth of gametime into it
i thought "this game is brilliant, but not much separates it from fallout 3"
it was only after i then started to replay fallout 3 that i realised all the little changes New Vegas made
i began to appreciate the new abundance of sidequests
the fact i barely waded through a single underground tunnel (excluding vaults)
the fact the quests have dozens of ways to be solved now rather than just either good: save the guy, or bad: kill the guy
the fact there are four ways to complete the game for replay value
the fact you can gamble
the simple fact it's actually possible to fill every stat to 100 now
the most obviously and importantly of all, the writing has elevated and become incredible.
such as when you work for Mr. House, the game is so clever it never really lets you know if he's good or evil
when you work for the NCR you assume you're doing the right thing, but little quests and the occassionally morally questionable thing makes you wonder 'are they perhaps the bad guys?'
even caesars legion the OBVIOUS evil faction
once you work for them you start to see things their way. you realise they want the same fundamentals as any other group. except mr house and yes man both just want to own the strip and be rich, leaving you to wonder wheather the horrifically black and foul Caesars legion have just had a bad press and in fact would be much much better for the mojave than anyone else

despite the bugs (which frankly i can live with) New Vegas isn't just the best of these three games
it's my game of the year
 

Keall

New member
Jul 5, 2010
21
0
0
Jaranja said:
Keall said:
Jaranja said:
Keall said:
Jaranja said:
Vkmies said:
Why is this not Fallout 1, Fallout 2 or Morrowind?
Keall said:
Vkmies said:
Why is this not Fallout 1, Fallout 2 or Morrowind?
this
Because that is not the question the OP wanted to ask?

It's simple, really. You didn't need to ask the question, you trolls.
The point being, if you're going to choose 2 games from one series, and the last game of another series, none of which were anywhere near as good as the previous games in those series, you should probably include the games that were actually really, really good. Fallout 1 and 2 were great games. Morrowind was an awesome game. Oblivion was good, Fallout 3 was disappointing to the point where I refuse to play NV.

I fail to see how this makes me a troll.
Because your way of thinking is completely different the the OP's. Maybe he didn't play the games you mentioned. He's asking that question, you can't say that he should be asking a completely different question that would yield completely different answers. Just shush.
I misread the original post. I thought he said to include them. No, I don't think the poster should change the question completely, however, I feel it would be... more fair if the OP had at least given more examples. Oblivion and Fallout 3 are not the best examples of the Elder Scrolls and Fallout, respectively. Granted, Oblivion was much better than Fallout 3 in respect to how it played to it's predecessors. Does that mean Fallout 3 is a bad game? Not at all. I, personally, didn't like it, but I can see why others did. Yes, the question would probably yield completely different answers, had he chosen to include the games that made Oblivion and Fallout 3/NV possible, I will admit that.
Alright, I'll let you off this time.

I thought Fallout 3 was amazing and I thought Oblivion was... Alright. Not good but not bad.

I need to play the original Fallout series but just haven't got around to it yet.
Definitely worth at least 3 playthroughs. Fallout: Tactics (I think that's what it was called) is also a game worth checking out. It's nothing like the others, but it has an interesting vibe to it that makes me actually kind of like it.
 

MiracleOfSound

Fight like a Krogan
Jan 3, 2009
17,776
0
0
Keall said:
The point being, if you're going to choose 2 games from one series, and the last game of another series, none of which were anywhere near as good as the previous games in those series, you should probably include the games that were actually really, really good. Fallout 1 and 2 were great games. Morrowind was an awesome game. Oblivion was good, Fallout 3 was disappointing to the point where I refuse to play NV.
This is all just your opinion. Why should the OP include games that you think are better just because you said so? Don't be so dogmatic. Lots of people like the newer games better.

I have played every game you mention. Fallout 3 and Oblivion are by far my favorite of them all.
 

Keall

New member
Jul 5, 2010
21
0
0
MiracleOfSound said:
Keall said:
The point being, if you're going to choose 2 games from one series, and the last game of another series, none of which were anywhere near as good as the previous games in those series, you should probably include the games that were actually really, really good. Fallout 1 and 2 were great games. Morrowind was an awesome game. Oblivion was good, Fallout 3 was disappointing to the point where I refuse to play NV.
This is all just your opinion. Why should the OP include games that you think are better just because you said so? Don't be so dogmatic. Lots of people like the newer games better.

I have played every game you mention. Fallout 3 and Oblivion are by far my favorite of them all.
I never said you weren't entitled to their position. However, you are probably the first person I've spoken to who has preferred Fallout 3 and Oblivion to Fallout 1 and 2, and Morrowind.
 

HT_Black

New member
May 1, 2009
2,845
0
0
I like New Vegas; it's actually good! But so is Oblivion. Really, so long as it isn't Fallout 3, it's cool.
 

MiracleOfSound

Fight like a Krogan
Jan 3, 2009
17,776
0
0
Keall said:
I never said you weren't entitled to their position. However, you are probably the first person I've spoken to who has preferred Fallout 3 and Oblivion to Fallout 1 and 2, and Morrowind.
Really? I know tonnes of people who do.

F1 and 2 and Morrowind are all fantastic games but they are dated now, some of the mechanics in them feel antiquated and clunky compared to the new ones.

That said, Morrowind's levelling system was a hundred times better than Oblivion's, and Fallout 3 is an amazing game but not a good sequel to the first 2, in my view it should have been released as Fallout: Capital Wasteland and New Vegas should be (edit) called Fallout 3.
 

Keall

New member
Jul 5, 2010
21
0
0
MiracleOfSound said:
Keall said:
I never said you weren't entitled to their position. However, you are probably the first person I've spoken to who has preferred Fallout 3 and Oblivion to Fallout 1 and 2, and Morrowind.
Really? I know tonnes of people who do.

F1 and 2 and Morrowind are all fantastic games but they are dated now, some of the mechanics in them feel antiquated and clunky compared to the new ones.

That said, Morrowind's levelling system was a hundred times better than Oblivion's, and Fallout 3 is an amazing game but not a good sequel to the first 2, in my view it should have been released as Fallout: Capital Wasteland and New Vegas should be (edit) called Fallout 3.
well, yes, if you'd read my other posts, you'd know I was referring to the games as parts of their series. I think Fallout 3 might have been enjoyable, had it not been a Fallout game. That said, I had been anticipating Fallout 3 for YEARS after playing the first two, and it was a serious letdown. I'll have to play NV if it's better as a Fallout game.
 

MiracleOfSound

Fight like a Krogan
Jan 3, 2009
17,776
0
0
Keall said:
well, yes, if you'd read my other posts, you'd know I was referring to the games as parts of their series. I think Fallout 3 might have been enjoyable, had it not been a Fallout game. That said, I had been anticipating Fallout 3 for YEARS after playing the first two, and it was a serious letdown. I'll have to play NV if it's better as a Fallout game.
It's a lot better as a sequel to the first two. Have a read of this, I was pretty honest in it:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.243339-Miracles-Whip-Fallout-New-Vegas?page=1
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,073
0
0
fallout new vegas is on top for sure, that game easily bumps up every single good thing FO3 did and more, it actually had a story (dont give me that crap, the FO3 main storyline was a piece of trash, liam neeson is the only thing that saved it. liberty prime was his protege)

the amount of content and fun in that game is gonna have me satisfied for years.

next would be oblivion (hopefully skyrim ousts this and new vegas, im pumpeeddd to see the upcoming videos for that), i love the fantasy setting, and oblivion delivers that with an awesome open world, yet fun filled adventure. the main storyline is pretty crap, but the factions and sidequests actually make up for it, along with the world not looking like a fucking steamrolled turd like fo3 does, so with magic, swords/shields, and bow + arrow, its alot of fun and its endless on what you can do.

so in short

fallout new vegas
oblivion
snacks
toilet paper
fallout 3
 

Vohn_exel

Residential Idiot
Oct 24, 2008
1,357
0
0
Oblivion for me. Fallout's landscape did TOO GOOD Of a job at being depressing, lol.
 

Still Life

New member
Sep 22, 2010
1,137
0
0
Netrigan said:
It's still a little daly to say for sure, but Im enjoying Vegas more than Fallout 3... even though I miss my Chinese Stealth Suit.

Oblivion is a non-starter since I'm not a fan of fantasy settings.
You know:

You can find two Chinese stealth suits at Hoover Dam. I found them, but haven't used them =]
 

Keall

New member
Jul 5, 2010
21
0
0
MiracleOfSound said:
Keall said:
well, yes, if you'd read my other posts, you'd know I was referring to the games as parts of their series. I think Fallout 3 might have been enjoyable, had it not been a Fallout game. That said, I had been anticipating Fallout 3 for YEARS after playing the first two, and it was a serious letdown. I'll have to play NV if it's better as a Fallout game.
It's a lot better as a sequel to the first two. Have a read of this, I was pretty honest in it:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.243339-Miracles-Whip-Fallout-New-Vegas?page=1
Alright, I'll be sure to check it out. I'll just borrow it, though. No point paying that much money on a game that could very well be disappointing. I was REALLY upset when I bought Fallout 3, because I bought it one of the first days it came out and hated it.
 

Tadaka

New member
Jun 8, 2006
23
0
0
Between Oblivion and Fallout I think it comes down to preference; do you like Sci Fi or Fantasy?

Having played a LOT of Oblivion, I found Fallout 3 to be almost the exact same game with guns instead of swords, and fewer options at that. Somebody mentioned more variety in Oblivion, I agree 100%. Not only that, anyone who has played Oblivion will notice right away the generic quality to the voice acting, dialog choices and even quest progression that you see in Fallout.

It got so bad for me that I actually had to turn the sound off when I talked to any character. Ugh