Poll: Fallout 4 or Elder Scrolls V?
- Thread starter TheDrunkNinja
- Start date
Recommended Videos
There were... Why does everyone always think this? That's not even counting the arena!Scikosomatic said:
I'm thinking about getting it off of steam. I'm so fricking tired of my enemies leveling too...fenrizz said:
Elder Scrolls V! They'll have the grab and telekinesis figured out, oblivion graphics and combat detection, Morrowind immersion and story, and a story based on a Guy Fawkes wannabe!
Well, when you think about it, if you want to talk about innovation in the Fallout franchise, Fallout went completely in a different direction with the third installment with a total overhaul and redesigned gameplay. I mean, we went from turn-based tactical gameplay to an action-packed RPG with FPS elements.orannis62 said:
But, in all honesty, I really feel that Fallout 3 was more of a successor to the Elder Scrolls series. Sure completely different story and setting, but they were just too similar in my book, both with hit and miss features.
So, what I'm really asking is if you want the perfect post-apocalyptic RPG or the perfect fantasy RPG.
I'd have to go with Fallout 4. I just really like the setting they've done with 3, and I enjoyed the feel of the game. Oblivion just felt really lacking to me in comparison. (I still need to get around to trying Morrowind.) I also like the idea of less standard fantasy RPG affairs.
Yeah, I wanna play out the mission where that Orc bloke was suppost to assassinate the little girl.grimsprice said:
So long as Bethesda never use that horrible old engine they've had on life-support for nearly a decade again, I'm all for either one, really.
Not to mention making their game more of an RPG and adding more indepth ways to interact with the world and it's people...
I've got a lot of complaints for Bethesda, they can improve a lot of stuff over their old games.
Not to mention making their game more of an RPG and adding more indepth ways to interact with the world and it's people...
I've got a lot of complaints for Bethesda, they can improve a lot of stuff over their old games.
Elder scrolls 5 as long as they bring back levitation, spears, the imperial legion, enemies and loot that aren't scaled, custom built dungeons, unique treasures and artifacts that can be found other than through daedric quests and the removal of quick travel.
Same here. I don't like brown/grey rubble as my scenery. I like the color green and I love being able to collect components to sell or combine into better items to sell. I have picked up Fallout 3, and the fire-breathing ants look like fun, but repetitive blasted scenery that doesn't even have a few oases of recovering greenery to relieve it-well, it can't hold my attention. If the next one had some stunted grass fields and small copses of fresh water and trees-I probably would enjoy it more. (Maybe it's a subconscious issue. Knowing that no plants = no food for animals = slow death up the food chain, I can't buy the viability of the ecosystem. So once the food stores ran out there would be the end of the survivors.)ShotgunShaman said:
More of every guild tbh. Another game in each franchise is inevitable, I'd like Elder Scrolls V first thoughScikosomatic said:
Fallout: New Vegas, only because I felt attached to the fallout world. NOTE: I have only played Oblivion and Fallout 3. Not to mention I have beat every single mission in Fallout 3 while I havn't found much time to play Oblivion because of MW2 and L4D2 and everything.
??? Umm...I'm talking about more than one thieves guild, more than one fighters guild, etc etcfeather240 said:
