And that's exactly why those laws are there. Because he's a teenager. Because he's just thinking about the next 5 minutes completely disregarding any long term consequences.Cowabungaa said:And this is why I sometimes hate laws. Things should be judged on a case-by-case basis. I have no doubt that he wanted the sex, I mean good heavens he's a teenager, legal definitions be damned. There is no real victim in this case. It's absolutely mind boggling for me as a foreigner that, for the law over there, this case is pretty much identical to plain rape.
Is he smart and mature enough to remember a condom?
Is he smart and mature enough to take STDs into account?
Is he smart and mature enough to know what he needs to know about pregnancies?
Is he smart and mature enough to oversee the emotional effects this will have on him?
Is he smart and mature enough to know what to do if, even with precautions taken, the girl gets pregnant?
Is he smart and mature enough to know what is and what is not appropriate in public settings?
etc.
etc.
etc.
Sex has consequences, whether we like it or not. Bad things can and do happen from sex, even if at the time both parties wanted it.
And most people below the age of consent aren't mature enough to deal with those consequences in a responsible manner or to learn from the mistakes they inevitably make.
For the same reason we prohibit minors from alcohol we also prohibit them from having sex. Because both are great on the short-term but can have very large consequences on the long term. And minors generally aren't mature enough to take those long term consequences into account, because they're physically unable to at the stage of brain development that they're at. Not to mention the hormones raging in their brain during puberty.