Poll: Fox News

Recommended Videos

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,831
0
0
I absolutely loathe Fox News. And the problem is that people in the US believe them unquestionably and don't take their words with even a pinch of salt, let alone the dollop that is really needed. They may have their decent points, as some have said, but on the whole those few points are drowned out by the sheer lies that they tell, not just about things like video games (which aren't exactly important), but also about things like the US government, openly opposing anything that the conservative fringes of US politics are against, even when they would be a massive benefit to the people and to the economy (the health bill, for example).

Ah well, at least we don't have anything that stupid or biased here in the UK...

The_root_of_all_evil said:
The American version of our Tabloids. Never to be taken as anything other than biased claims unless you have two other reliable sources backing them up.

And you know why?

He owns both.
Damn.

This man, Rupert Murdoch, is the reason why the only newspaper I trust is my student newspaper at university (because student journalism, thankfully, appears to be one of the few areas of journalism that still has relative journalistic integrity). Even those papers in the UK that aren't owned by Murdoch tend to be biased, simply in the opposite direction. My parents buy The Sun and News Of The World all the time, and something I noticed when I still lived with them is that both newspapers tend to put 'celebrity news' on the front page (particularly football stuff) unless there's a political scandal, instead of real news that we should actually care about (how much attention did they give the student protests except to call for student arrests of the idiots who were throwing stuff off the Conservative tower roof?). Also, they usually put all their support behind the Opposition, regardless of who's in power, except for right after an election.

The only news source I trust now, that isn't student journalism, is the BBC, and Reuters. At least with the BBC there's very little bias at all, and Reuters are completely independent anyway...
 

RA92

New member
Jan 1, 2011
3,079
0
0
Rationalization said:
Comedy Central is reliable. And CNN can always be relied on to be the least biased but incompetent.
lacktheknack said:
Thus, all three viewed together is a better option than just one.
Well, I prefer my news from BBC and Reuters but mostly from Al Jazeera after it was recommended by Glenn Greenwald.

And before you start giving Al Jazeera funny looks for its name, remember, Sir David Frost (of Frost/Nixon fame) works there, as does Riz Khan (formerly from CNN and BBC). I've seen few shows that look as deep into the USA as their show Fault Line, hosted by Josh Rushing (a former Marine) and Avi Lewis (from CBC).

Compared to them, US broadcasters are downright incompetent.

During the 2011 Egyptian protests, Salon.com wrote that "Al Jazeera's Egypt coverage embarrasses U.S. cable news channels.", and WikiLeaks commented on their Twitter feed that "Yes, we may have helped Tunisia, Egypt. But let us not forget the elephant in the room: Al Jazeera + sat dishes".

Of course, to counter their influence, the US simply <url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera#United_States>bombed <url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera_bombing_memo#Previous_U.S._bombings_of_Al_Jazeera_offices>them.
 

Varanfan9

New member
Mar 12, 2010
788
0
0
I really hate them. The idiots like this keep actual smart Conservatives under wraps while they can display their udder stupidity in the lime light.
 

juraigamer

New member
Sep 3, 2008
81
0
0
The entire channel is ignorance and warped words and stories designed to further a certain political party, furthermore they won't even state that's the case. They even try to deny accusations that others can show them, in video records, even recent ones. Pure ignorance and it's only hurting the united... well I honestly wouldn't call it united... states.
 

Thedayrecker

New member
Jun 23, 2010
1,541
0
0
They're just stupid beyond belief.

I get the feeling they're RL Trolls.... I mean nobody can honestly believe that, right?
 

Tim_Buoy

New member
Jul 7, 2010
568
0
0
emeraldrafael said:
GeorgW said:
The thing that bugs the most is the fact that no one seems to stand up to them. Sure, if they attack a company personally they will defend themselves, but why are they even allowed to spread these lies? Since it's free publicity for the games, they have never been sued for damages, and this really annoys me. This is text book slander, and it's illegal.
And it's not just games, they frequently do reports on things they have no actual knowledge of.
Because Fox news is the word of (Conservative) Republicans, and in this day and age, to go against them is to make half the country think you're in leagues with Bin Laden and you're a terrorist who wants to destroy America. And thats just bad rep.

Actually, what bothers me is its right wing propaganda really, and they seem to have a Nazi fetish. Seriously. Plus the chick that hosts their morning show is pants on head retarded. And that Bill O'Reilly is some kinda national father figure, and he doesnt know how waves work.

But then again, I'm a Democrat, and thus biased, but I just dont like anyone there. I dont like any big political figures and such, but Fox news is the worse, cause they're dangerous. People actually honestly believe them, and they do FM radio in my area. So yeah.

Flat out, dont like them, but I dont think tehy need to be destroyed. Educated would help. Or just have the entire cast replaced.
dont worry many republicans share your views of fox news we hate being represented by these racist fucktards i think a 12 year old child would do a better job than they do
 

hexFrank202

New member
Mar 21, 2010
303
0
0
Woodsey said:
And I know science doesn't have all the answers, that's not what I'm saying - I'm saying, his reasoning of, "it doesn't have all the answers, so I'm just going to accept the default option, and nevermind the fact I don't even know other planets have moons," is ridiculous.
I don't think you picked-up what I was saying before; Reilly isn't saying "everyone should believe in God", he's just explaining why he believes in God.

Also, not knowing other planets have moons is pretty weird. But hey, no one ever said he was a brilliant astronomer. If my memory serves, Sherlock Holmes didn't know anything about space either... just saying.
 

Whoolpurse

New member
Jul 14, 2008
413
0
0
I'm not really from the U.S. But I want them to be shut down, since they are hilariously misinforming, but then again, sometimes their stupidity makes my day.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
UltraHammer said:
Woodsey said:
And I know science doesn't have all the answers, that's not what I'm saying - I'm saying, his reasoning of, "it doesn't have all the answers, so I'm just going to accept the default option, and nevermind the fact I don't even know other planets have moons," is ridiculous.
I don't think you picked-up what I was saying before; Reilly isn't saying "everyone should believe in God", he's just explaining why he believes in God.

Also, not knowing other planets have moons is pretty weird. But hey, no one ever said he was a brilliant astronomer. If my memory serves, Sherlock Holmes didn't know anything about space either... just saying.
You don't need to be a brilliant astronomer, any 6-year-old could tell you that other planets have moons - and you'd expect him to have that basic knowledge before making a video about how Earth must have been made by God, since we're the only planet to have a moon.

Sherlock Holmes wasn't a real person, nor was he talking to millions of people each day.
 

Anchupom

In it for the Pub Club cookies
Apr 15, 2009
779
0
0
Jaranja said:
Wait wait wait... Jesus was jewish...
Yeah, he was "King of the Jews" wasn't he? Mind you, I haven't payed religion attention in so long that I can't be trusted to tell you how many of each animal Noah took on the ark.

OT:
They're a corrupt, lying, filthy excuse for a news station that leans so far to the right it must be embarrassing to any level-headed American. I'm sure even rednecks think it goes a bit far.

But I don't think they should burn in hell. There's a good chance I'll end up there, as I'm a non-believer (and a proud blasphemer), and being stuck with FOX news for the rest of eternity would be infinitely worse than Lucifer could dish out.

Stick 'em in purgatory. Alone.
 
May 5, 2010
4,831
0
0
Kids, this is what he call a rhetorical question. It's a question which both the speaker and the person being asked already know the answer to, and it is only asked to prove a point.

That's all the time we have for today. Next week we'll cover trolls, and why you shouldn't feed them. Especially not by making topics devoted to badmouthing them.
 

maddawg IAJI

I prefer the term "Zomguard"
Feb 12, 2009
7,840
0
0
I'm not gonna say anyone deserves to burn in hell, but they are seriously one of the poorest excuses for a news station in the country. Between their bias during political years and their incapability of getting their facts straight (Lets not forget that they once accused their boss of having ties to terrorists), I highly doubt many of them are actually doing anything noteworthy.
 

Tim_Buoy

New member
Jul 7, 2010
568
0
0
Raiyan 1.0 said:
Jatal Khyron said:
For every Rush Limbaugh, there is a Michael Moore.
Out of pure non-confrontational curiosity, why do people hate Michael Moore?
same reason they hate fox news just on the other end of the spectrum but he is on my list as the lowest form of human life on this planet
 

DuctTapeJedi

New member
Nov 2, 2010
1,626
0
0
Woodsey said:
Dags90 said:
Woodsey said:
I've seen Bill O'Reilly categorically state that Stephen Hawking (he actually kept calling him Hawkings) has no explanation for the moon or the tides.
My favorite is when Bill O'Reilly implied that an 11 year old boy who was abducted and sexually abused for four years enjoyed it. You know, because 'he didn't have to go to school'.
That just reminds me of another Glenn Beck story actually!


Here are the O'Reilly comments too:

Wait, did O'Reilly really just say that Stephen Hawking can't explain why the sun rises, and how the tides work? Dude, I can explain those things. He really still considers those mysteries?!

*Note to non-Christian Escapists: I swear, we don't all think like this. It's just that Fox 'News' won't give t.v. shows to any of us that are sane.

OT: While I believe they have the right to say what they want under the First Amendment, I think they should legally be required to change the name of their network, as referring to themselves as 'news' is false advertising.
 

ShaqLevick

New member
Jul 14, 2009
220
0
0
Jaranja said:
Woodsey said:
My thoughts?

Well, I've seen Glenn Beck tell a woman that euthanasia is where the government elects to kill you if you're too much of a financial burden, and I've seen Bill O'Reilly categorically state that Stephen Hawking (he actually kept calling him Hawkings) has no explanation for the moon or the tides.

Their biggest and "best" are a bunch of manipulative morons (or geniuses, depending on how you look at it) who receive viewing figures they probably sold their souls to the devil for.

Glenn Beck even blames the Jews for Jesus' death for fuck's sake.

Don't even get me started on that fucking chalk board of his.
Wait wait wait... Jesus was jewish...
And you know what? We did it. We sold him down the river to those fucking Romans! Why you might ask... well you see he wanted us to give up our Jew gold, I wouldn't stand for that any day of the week.
 

Quesa

New member
Jul 8, 2009
329
0
0
There's nothing inherently wrong with FoxNews or MSNBC, the problem is the number of people who view something being preached with their brand of bias as being the only true and just voice of reason in the world and anything else as propaganda.