I prefer PC controls, but due to not being able to update my PC every two minutes I tend to play mostly on consoles.
Yeah i know the reason i played Goldeneye so much was that we could get together on one console and play with 3 other people. even though the screen was split and you can see what the others were doing. now if anything only 2 max can play on the same console or you need a whole other console to hook up with another. But usually pc's can be lan partied so i like that aspect of it.Pararaptor said:Well, if I want to be able to shoot accurately or play through single player, PC.
But co-op on a console was so much more fun than I've ever had playing single player.
In the average modern console FPS your aim will snap to the nearest target when you hit the ironsight button [CoD clones] or the weapons will be set up to either have comically huge cones of fire, auto-aim, or have a zoom scope [Halo]. The net result is that the game's lack of precision in allocating hits eliminates the need for fine aim. Having played it on PS3 and PC, CoD4 is actually harder with a mouse since the enemy placement assumes the snap-to-target mechanic is still in place when it isn't. Also, the M/K setup does come with the disadvantage of lacking analog movement [meaning you need lean keys because you can't easily take a half-step], so life's not all roses with a mouse.Kollega said:I find FPSes on consoles to be an oxymoron. Seriously, guys - even with aim assistance, HOW IN THE HELL DO YOU MANAGE TO AIM WITH THUMBSTICKS?! It has to take idiotic amounts of prescision. This goes doubly for multiplayer. I really, really do not understand how you manage to get decent accuracy.
And i salute you for overcoming ridiculously inconvinient control scheme.
it has its place, like co-op split screen XD man i love split screen gaming!! they really should do more of it!!gadafgadaf said:This has prolly been over done topic wise but i'm new to this forum so here is a quick poll to assuage my curiosity. What do you think?
How in the world can you even play fps games on consoles? last game i played ALOT was goldeneye and a bit of halo.
If you have to worry about three different axis*(xyz) of control for look with both your thumbs how are you going to press square, triangle, X, O (ps3) at the same time you look? Even with triggers...auto aim is blasphemy!
FPS on consoles is an abomination, if i had a time machine i would go back in time and prevent it from happening. Then i would go on an excellent adventure or perhaps a bogus journey.
It's because of our massive sex appeal.FallenJellyDoughnut said:FLAME WAR ALERT!
Seriously, why do we allow people with under 100 posts create topics?
Woodsey, you know how things work around here, no need for any snark. It's clearly stated in the rules of the forum that "vs" threads are looked down upon. The guy wasn't being an ass about it, he just stated it and left, though if I were him I would have added that it is in the terms we are expected to read before posting on the site.Woodsey said:Because they get clogged up with people saying: "consoles threads are bad".
Just ignore him.
depending if your computer can take it, if your computer isnt a gaming computer you could have problemsD_987 said:It really depends on the type off experience your after.I for one claim games like CoD work better on the consoles, because off the fast-paced nature off the game and its "casual" gameplay. If your just after a fun shooter without caring to much about "skill" and all the other rubbish, then those type of games work better on a console.
Whilst shooters like Battlefield, larger, more open games, undoubtedly work better on a PC where precision aiming and larger teams are needed for the more rewarding experience, simply because PC's can take more players.