Okay, I've seen some crazy ones in my time, but that's taking the biscuit! Genuine LOL.Dags90 said:And really captcha?
![]()
Okay, I've seen some crazy ones in my time, but that's taking the biscuit! Genuine LOL.Dags90 said:And really captcha?
![]()
You do realize your taking the position of attacking my beliefs right? At this point I'd rather not keep typing religion and just put out there that I'm Christian. If Christianity is to be believed then everything God has said (and by extension everything in the Bible) is law. I personally don't see why He chose to make this particular thing wrong, but I do understand the reasoning for it. Also, don't go into "Well what if it is wrong?" your word is as good as mine and thats an entirely different topic.Woodsey said:You said yourself you don't see a problem with it, yet you will put forward that opinion it is "wrong" just because your religion says so. And I quote: "I put my religion before my own agenda." Its not even an agenda, you're just absorbing someone else's (several 1000 years old and completely irrelevant to today) opinion... just because.Russirishican said:Knew there would be hate coming for this.Woodsey said:Surely its more a matter of not supporting discrimination, as opposed to supporting homosexuality? What is there to support about it? People don't choose, and its not right to discriminate against them for something so irrelevant.
So you actively choose to not think for yourself? Remarkable. And people don't choose, do we honestly need to go over the (lack of) logic regarding that?Russirishican said:My religion, although personally I don't see what is wrong with it, I put my religion before my own agenda. However my religion doesn't say, "Hate homosexuals with a fiery passion." like most members of my denomination would have you believe. So I don't. Basically I'm completely fine with gay people I just wouldn't make a choice to be one myself.Sarpedon said:Why do you think it's wrong? I'm just curious.Russirishican said:I'm indifferent, I don't support it, because I think its wrong. But honestly, I couldn't care less. I'm certainly not going to persecute gay people, I treat them the same as anyone else.
I do think for myself, I wouldn't believe in something I knew nothing about, I know why my religion says its wrong, and I made my decision to follow that. Besides, why is it any of your concern, because I've made it pretty clear that I'm not going to go around shoving my religion down your collective throats.
And it bothers me because its that sort of stupidity that means we have to have threads about supporting homosexuality in the first place.
As I've said before there are many people who think Jesus was gay, and from other sources I've been told that the whole part of being gay was wrong was added much much later in Roman times when Christianity needed more followers (It's common belief that many Romans had openly gay relationships) and this was added to stop this and also encourage heterosexual relationships, so there would be more Christians.Russirishican said:You do realize your taking the position of attacking my beliefs right? At this point I'd rather not keep typing religion and just put out there that I'm Christian. If Christianity is to be believed then everything God has said (and by extension everything in the Bible) is law. I personally don't see why He chose to make this particular thing wrong, but I do understand the reasoning for it.
Where does He say this?Russirishican said:You do realize your taking the position of attacking my beliefs right? At this point I'd rather not keep typing religion and just put out there that I'm Christian. If Christianity is to be believed then everything God has said (and by extension everything in the Bible) is law. I personally don't see why He chose to make this particular thing wrong, but I do understand the reasoning for it.
Way to go, you missed the point. I didn't say they were good, in fact I don't like quite a few of their songs because they're too slow for my tastes. I said talented. Talented as in skilled. As in they play complicated rifts and have evidently put a lot of time and effort into their music. Good has nothing to do with it. Remember that part where I said they were talented "REGARDLESS OF HOW MUCH YOU LIKED THEM." It's like Bach or Leonardo De Vinci; You don't have to like it, but it took skill to do (note: Led Zeppelin is not at the level of these artists this is an analogy). Furthermore one post is not a profile for my entire world view; I don't view everything too much in black and white, stop talking about me like you know me. I mentioned a few topics that had concrete right and wrong and I in no way white washed that over every topic ever. I was making points about certain cases and certain things, there is plenty of places where neutrality/gray area is fine (see: abortion, US involvement in the Libyan rebellion, video game preferences, age of consent etc.) my point is that homosexuality is not one of those.AndyFromMonday said:So basically what you're saying is that your belief is right and the other dudes is wrong because you believe Led Zeppelin to be a good band. This "neutral" thing is there for a reason. People disagree on lots of things and most of the times those things are based on opinion. Just because you believe the band to be talented doesn't mean someone else will believe the same thing. If he disagrees with you in no way does it mean you're correct on your assumption. The fact of the matter is, it's all a matter of taste, at least when it comes to things as trivial as that. You view the world to much in a "black and white" manner. Try and work on that. There are loads of deviations from the norm.Havik223 said:Many of these debates boil down to "I disagree with (trickle down/destroying the atmosphere/your evaluation of the band's skills)," but it's not a matter of agree/disagree, it's a matter of right and wrong. Trickle down doesn't work, destroying the atmosphere is a bad idea and Led Zeppelin were damn talented regardless of how much you liked them.
I appreciate your respect of my views, thank you.AnkaraTheFallen said:As I've said before there are many people who think Jesus was gay, and from other sources I've been told that the whole part of being gay was wrong was added much much later in Roman times when Christianity needed more followers (It's common belief that many Romans had openly gay relationships) and this was added to stop this and also encourage heterosexual relationships, so there would be more Christians.Russirishican said:You do realize your taking the position of attacking my beliefs right? At this point I'd rather not keep typing religion and just put out there that I'm Christian. If Christianity is to be believed then everything God has said (and by extension everything in the Bible) is law. I personally don't see why He chose to make this particular thing wrong, but I do understand the reasoning for it.
Again, I have nothing against your religious beliefs and actually I wish more Christians took your view of not having a problem with gays.