U235 Is The Bomb said:Actually, the very fact that the younger males of families with multiple male children are more likely to be gay is evidence to support a genetic influence in determining sexual orientation. I stumbled across a humorous video on youtube, I and think it explains it pretty well: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYMjXucTFaM.TheGuiggleMonster said:Personally I don't believe that it is genetic or whatever. There must be some psychological trigger to it, and when something is psychological you can never be 100% certain that is voluntary or not. I mean, in families with multiple boys, the younger boys are statistically more likely to turn out homosexual, so I very much doubt it's genetic, and frankly I wouldn't see the point in an allele which made it far less likely for the carrier to reproduce or why it's so common.
Sadly I know the feeling, I'm not in any hurry to tell my parents.sansamour14 said:same.AnkaraTheFallen said:Well I am gay so I'd be a bit of a hypocrite if I was against it.
Saying that I was brought up as a strong believing christian and told that being gay was a sin for most of my young life, so that really messed me up when I found out I was gay. >.<
living with religious fanatics so.....not leaving ma closet anytime soon
OK. That's because the personal belief of "being gay is wrong because other people tell me so" is fucking stupid. And actually, you said you had no problem with it, but you'd ignore your own opinion because your religion tells you to.Russirishican said:I know what it is I believe, I'm just not quite sure how to put it into words, not that I have to explain it to you anyway, but I will for the sake of discussion. You seem to be doubling back on my own words though. I said I thought that it was wrong, not that I don't like gay people.Woodsey said:That's because the personal belief of "I don't like gays because other people tell me so" is fucking stupid. Considering you DO get to choose your religion, I don't really see why you've chosen one that means you have to ignore what you really think.Russirishican said:You do realize your taking the position of attacking my beliefs right? At this point I'd rather not keep typing religion and just put out there that I'm Christian. If Christianity is to be believed then everything God has said (and by extension everything in the Bible) is law. I personally don't see why He chose to make this particular thing wrong, but I do understand the reasoning for it. Also, don't go into "Well what if it is wrong?" your word is as good as mine and thats an entirely different topic.Woodsey said:You said yourself you don't see a problem with it, yet you will put forward that opinion it is "wrong" just because your religion says so. And I quote: "I put my religion before my own agenda." Its not even an agenda, you're just absorbing someone else's (several 1000 years old and completely irrelevant to today) opinion... just because.Russirishican said:Knew there would be hate coming for this.Woodsey said:Surely its more a matter of not supporting discrimination, as opposed to supporting homosexuality? What is there to support about it? People don't choose, and its not right to discriminate against them for something so irrelevant.
So you actively choose to not think for yourself? Remarkable. And people don't choose, do we honestly need to go over the (lack of) logic regarding that?Russirishican said:My religion, although personally I don't see what is wrong with it, I put my religion before my own agenda. However my religion doesn't say, "Hate homosexuals with a fiery passion." like most members of my denomination would have you believe. So I don't. Basically I'm completely fine with gay people I just wouldn't make a choice to be one myself.Sarpedon said:Why do you think it's wrong? I'm just curious.Russirishican said:I'm indifferent, I don't support it, because I think its wrong. But honestly, I couldn't care less. I'm certainly not going to persecute gay people, I treat them the same as anyone else.
I do think for myself, I wouldn't believe in something I knew nothing about, I know why my religion says its wrong, and I made my decision to follow that. Besides, why is it any of your concern, because I've made it pretty clear that I'm not going to go around shoving my religion down your collective throats.
And it bothers me because its that sort of stupidity that means we have to have threads about supporting homosexuality in the first place.
Just because it is more likely for identical twins to have highly similar personalities does not make it a definite.Relaver said:I am against homosexuality. Part of the reason is because I am christian and in the Bible it clearly states that homosexuality is an abomination to the Lord.(in Leviticus)
I by no means hate gay people at all I see no reason for it at all, and God tells to only hate the sin but love the sinner
It also is definately is not gentic because I know a pair identical twins, one is gay and the other is not. If it was genetic they would BOTH be gay . Homosexuality is a choice, you chose to be gay.
TheGuiggleMonster said:U235 Is The Bomb said:Actually, the very fact that the younger males of families with multiple male children are more likely to be gay is evidence to support a genetic influence in determining sexual orientation. I stumbled across a humorous video on youtube, I and think it explains it pretty well: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYMjXucTFaM.TheGuiggleMonster said:Personally I don't believe that it is genetic or whatever. There must be some psychological trigger to it, and when something is psychological you can never be 100% certain that is voluntary or not. I mean, in families with multiple boys, the younger boys are statistically more likely to turn out homosexual, so I very much doubt it's genetic, and frankly I wouldn't see the point in an allele which made it far less likely for the carrier to reproduce or why it's so common.
Lol... That is not genetics. In science, it would be considered an environmental factor. The genetics are determined at meiosis and fertilisation which happen before pregnancy, and after the embryo is formed, there is no genetic change. Your video also provides no explanation as to why antibodies are more likely to make the fetus turn homosexual.
Speaking as someone who is and has an identical twin. True Idents are much rarer than most people think. Second our DNA is close enough that we can easily be mistaken for each other should something come up we're both deputies/cops so our DNA is on file and I know when mine was being filed in the NDIS it showed that I was him at first. We both have lupus and are dyslexic. Our fingerprints are different though because that occurs in the womb or something and since about age 8 we always made it a point to cut our hair differently. Different tattoos too. Also, we have magical powers.AnkaraTheFallen said:Identical twins can still have different genetics, I've seen a pair where one has a serious learning difficulty from birth (sorry I can't remember the conditions name) and the other doesn't, but they are identical in every other way. A more basic example would be DNA, identical twins still have different DNA just like any siblings do.Relaver said:I am against homosexuality. Part of the reason is because I am christian and in the Bible it clearly states that homosexuality is an abomination to the Lord.(in Leviticus)
I by no means hate gay people at all I see no reason for it at all, and God tells to only hate the sin but love the sinner
It also is definately is not gentic because I know a pair identical twins, one is gay and the other is not. If it was genetic they would BOTH be gay . Homosexuality is a choice, you chose to be gay.
And as someone who is gay, I've never though of it as a choice, if it was I would choose to be straight most probably after all the issues I've had at home over it.
hooray for dogma over personal thought? Sorry if that was rude, but I just really don't understand that way of thinking, if you don't personally think it's wrong you shouldn't be swayed by pressure of your faith. But that is of course just my opinion, and to each their own I suppose.Russirishican said:My religion, although personally I don't see what is wrong with it, I put my religion before my own agenda. However my religion doesn't say, "Hate homosexuals with a fiery passion." like most members of my denomination would have you believe. So I don't. Basically I'm completely fine with gay people I just wouldn't make a choice to be one myself.Sarpedon said:Why do you think it's wrong? I'm just curious.Russirishican said:I'm indifferent, I don't support it, because I think its wrong. But honestly, I couldn't care less. I'm certainly not going to persecute gay people, I treat them the same as anyone else.
Right.Relaver said:I am against homosexuality. Part of the reason is because I am christian and in the Bible it clearly states that homosexuality is an abomination to the Lord.(in Leviticus)
I by no means hate gay people at all I see no reason for it at all, and God tells to only hate the sin but love the sinner
It also is definately is not gentic because I know a pair identical twins, one is gay and the other is not. If it was genetic they would BOTH be gay . Homosexuality is a choice, you chose to be gay.
What if someone's intolerance meant that someone else being gay hurt them? They didn't CHOOSE to hate gays, they just do?Sarpedon said:The question is simple. Don't forget to add WHY you feel the way you do.
For my own vote, I'm a strong supporter of homosexuality, though I'm by no means gay myself. I firmly believe that, as long as it's not hurting anyone else, people should be able to live their lives however they damn well please. This includes being able to love and marry whomever they please.
So, escapists, How do YOU feel? And remember, tell us why you feel that way.
EDIT: Just so people will stop spouting it off, I realize that this is rather poorly phrased. I think most of you can glean my meaning though, without needing to point out that I could have worded this differently.