There's a difference between not actively supporting it and being homophobic. I mean, what is supporting in this context? Would you have to actively be pro-gay? Well I'm not. I'm not anti-gay either, they're just people who deserve their share in life, but their way of being is not so good as to deserve supporting or so bad as to deserve defamation or persecution. it is neutral, simply a way of life. I don't support heterosexuality either, for the same reasons.Sightless Wisdom said:Anyone who doesn't "support" homosexuality is right on the same level with those who don't "support" ethnicities other than Caucasian.
Now gay rights on the other hand, is something that does deserve supporting, but actually supporting homosexuality just doesn't make sense.
I suppose its more of a poorly worded OP than anything.
And I hope my meaning has come through properly, its a little difficult to articulate.
edit:
I just like the idea of the Christians protesting against prawns, and lobsters being denounced as immoral. The Bible's so silly!Rascarin said:2. As for Leviticus, it also demands animal sacrifice (1:9), no contact with menstruating women (12:19-24), advocates slavery (25:44), calls shellfish an abomination (11:10), forbids cutting the hair around the temples (19:27), touching the skin of a dead pig (11:6-8) and wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (19:19).
Oh, and well done for pointing out the ridiculousness of people claiming Leviticus as proof that gayness is immoral so eloquently.