Didn't help my relationship with my dad, though. At least back then.Headsprouter said:It gave me a fear of punishment, respect for authority and a good understanding of how pain hurts. At least..that's what i think it might've helped with.
I couldn't agree more. My dad stopped spanking me when i was 12 but he stopped spanking my little brother at 5. Bit unfair. Maybe if my little brother (now 10) would have learnt to keep his voice down by now and actually be respectful to adults and peers had he been spanked.Shoggoth2588 said:When I was a kid I was a little bastard. I was spanked a couple of times and I'm pretty sure I'm alright now. It kinda grates on my though, when I see my younger siblings being worse than I remember being myself and they are ignored or, talked at. HIT THEM!
Yes I know perfectly well that quote from ancient Greece about children being out of control, and I`m not one of those people going out of my way saying children are all out of control today.Varya said:In Sweden it's been illegal since 79 and I can safely say that there is no real support for it. It's as fundamentally obvious that you don't lay hands on children as it is you don't beat your spouse. People have always, and I mean always as in as far as we have written documentation, complained that the "younger generation" is out of control, and you know what, it wasn't true in ancient Greece and it isn't true today.I wish I could pull out data from my... backside... telling you that it's bad but I don't know where to find it. A translated quote from wikipedia will have to do, and I know I am begging for a flame war about sources and contradictory studies but nevertheless, it's been proven to have ill effects, whether you accept it or not.RandV80 said:In 10-20 years it may be a little different as more kids who were never spanked grow into adults and are able to voice their opinion, but for today that's just plain and simple the way it is. Most of us were spanked as kids, most of us don't think there was anything wrong with it, in fact it was beneficial, and most of us think it's a legit form of discipline.
Personally, what always bugs me with the opposite side of the fence is the 'bubble wrap' approach to rasing children. It's all too clean and sterile, like it's a tragedy if a kid gets dirty or scrapes a knee. Or if a kid gets a smack on the bottom it's tragic and just might scar him for life. This is something that most people just won't fundamentally agree with.
"A meta-analysis from 2002 analyzing 60 years of research regarding child-spanking concluded that child-spanking was correlated with several drawbacks and no other benefits than instantaneous obedience."http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aga
I do think spanking is nothing short of child-abuse. No, not everyone get harmed by it, that doesn't make it right
Mmm, maybe. But when my mum and dad just told us off, I just shrugged it off and didn't pay attention. First time my dad clipped us one was when I vandilised property. Didn't do it again. I needed to learn (as a child), bad actions = pain and therefore I didn't want to get smacked again so I sure as hell didn't do it again. Then as I grew I learned that vandalising is just a fucked up thing and thus, now (as an adult) I don't do it because of reasoning and not becasue it's related to pain.Varya said:See now, that would mean that no one in my country could have been raised properly for over 30 years. We know for a fact that you can raise kids without spanking. I know I have never been spanked,and I consider myself to have firm moral values, amongst them is that you should never ever, hurt a child. Now I know for a fact, you can raise kids without any physical harm, and I know for a fact that it can give negative consequences. It seems clear to me.Lord_Nemesis said:I voted yes, without physical discipline, I would not of had the values I have today. Respect for others, self-control etc. I feel sorry for the parents who don't physcially discipline their children because they are letting them down and I feel sorry for the kids because they are not learning the lessons they need to.
I don't think spanking alone does that. If you mean punishment, then yes, punishment teaches kids that every action (in this case bad) has consequences. But that does not mean spanking is the only effective way of punishment. For me, at least, a spank seems insignificant in physical damage but runs the chance of mental damage. It really comes to what the kid takes out of it. If they think, "Hey, if someone does something wrong then they deserve physical punishment for what they did (AKA: beating them senseless)," then the spanking brought some baggage on them. I'm not saying that spanking is horrible and should be made illeagal, but instead that there are other alternatives that don't incite physical violence against a child.Dana22 said:By lasting psychological effect, you mean that children learns that every action (whether good or bad) has its consequences ? I agree.katsumoto03 said:Yes. It made me a benevolent fucking paragon because it totally has lasting psychological effects.
No, seriously.
I really hope you are being sarcastic. Going on the assumption that your not, ill say this to you. YOUR WRONG. I don't care that you felt spanking helped you become a better person, everyone is liable to their own opinions. But blaming all of the wrongs that we have in modern society on the idea that they weren't spanked as children is ridiculous. With all likelihood, just as many of them were spanked as children as normal members of society were. Don't jump to such sudden conclusions next time, it makes you sound ignorant (which I'm guessing that since you are on the Escapist you are not...)Batfred said:Bring back corporal punishment! Without it, you get the ASBO, hoodie, threatening kid, Jamie Bulger murdering society that we have today. I was spanked, my brothers and sister were spanked, my parents and their parents were all spanked, we all turned out ok.
A little bit of National Service wouldn't go amiss either!