I couldn't have said it better myself.Instant K4rma said:I really liked it. I am a huge Tarantino fan, and I would say he really did well with Basterds. His best? No. Nothing, Tarantino or not, tops Pulp Fiction in my eyes, but it's still a fantastic film.
In reality, Neo would look like swiss cheese, in reality, James Bond would have more STDs than you can count, in reality, there wouldnt've been any snakes on that plane, in reality, there wouldn't be a poltergeist in that house.HK_01 said:It's okay, but nothing great. Throughout the whole movie I thought: "In reality, they'd have been killed within a week."
I like suspense building, but I thought they were taking it a bit too far, I was nearly zoning out.Marik2 said:And that is the problem these days. People mostly wanna see action scenes instead of suspense building.EmileeElectro said:I was meh. SO much talking, which made me lose interest. The action scenes were really good though.
But the Basterds did succeed at their plan! Hitler died didn't he?xXAsherahXx said:Iight, this is only because my friend won't stop bitching about it. He keeps telling me to make this thread so I am. Do you like Inglorious Basterds? I say no. The plot development takes way too long and it results in nothing elaborate. Shosanna or Soshanna doesn't get killed by that guy from the beginning. The Basterds fail their plan. It may be somewhat of a comedy, but I didn't laugh, I just viewed it as stupid, now I'm going to make this a poll and you will agree that the movie sucks solely because I want to tell him that I win. Now vote damn-it!!
...It appears I unintentionally confused some people. Not not means yes because they cancel. So Yes means you hate it, No means you like it.
You have the best scene of the best movie as an avatar. Excellent.Instant K4rma said:I really liked it. I am a huge Tarantino fan, and I would say he really did well with Basterds. His best? No. Nothing, Tarantino or not, tops Pulp Fiction in my eyes, but it's still a fantastic film. I actually just picked it up on DVD not too long ago.
Sorry. I'm going to use my super evasion skills to continue avoiding the question.Simriel said:I am trying to get an answer to my question.Con Carne said:Ummmm.....do you read things through? I said a potentially stupid debate. I didn't say a "debate with a stupid person" What are you trying to accomplish by twisting my words?Simriel said:I am stupid now? Well that is so nice of you to say.Con Carne said:You're absolutely right. I am avoiding the question. I'm also avoiding a potentially stupid online debate over something as simple as an OPINION.Simriel said:You are avoiding the question.Con Carne said:I never once, said anything about my taste in movies being better than yours. I'm just stating my opinions, and you seem to be getting bent out of shape about them.Simriel said:So what films of 2009 appealed to your amazing and obviously so much more refined than my own tastes?Con Carne said:Avatar was one of the "Best Films of the year" too. I try to forget that exists also.Simriel said:Well given that it was one of the best films of the year, and frankly it was HITLER GETTING SHOT WITH MACHINE GUNS! forgetting what happened seems a bit strangeCon Carne said:Simriel said:Dude... the events portrayed Valkyrie really happened. Thats pretty much how the assassination attempt went down. Its based on real events. In Inglorious Basterds they succeed in killing Hitler. Hell they shoot his body to pieces with sub machine guns.Con Carne said:It was slow, boring, and awful. Terentino (I know I'll be flamed for this lol) Needs to stop making films and go to a part of the world so we can forget he exists.
The only thing I give it credit for, is doing the same thing "Valkyrie" did....keeping it so they didn't succeed in killing Hitler.
Yeah, I know "Valkyrie" was based on a true story.
Forgive me for forgetting how Basterds ended. I tried to block it's atrocity from memory.
LOL, sigh.
I enjoyed the dark knight ALOT but if that's your best movie I'd suggest broadening your horizons.CokeColaForTheWIn said:It was good, but i hated Brad Pitt and his accent, if they took him out, it would have been the best film ever, next to The Dark Knight.
Yeah the results are going to be skewed to hell and back with his "clever" double negative.seminoob said:argh! damn you and your confusing questions! i clicked yes!... that means that i didn't like it right?
anyway i thought it was a good film, not mindblowing but better than most i've seen.