I lol when people who have zero knowledge on science bash on McDonalds.Kpt._Rob said:If my life were to be divided up into story arcs with themes, one of the two themes of this part of my life would be "what do I need to do to be healthy." While researching the answer to that question I came upon this, a list of the ingredients in a Chicken McNugget. I would like to share with you now an excerpt from the notes I took from Michael Pollan's book The Omnivore's Dilemma.
... So now, if I may, let me pose a question. What the hell is wrong with us? Why would anyone eat this? Why would anyone think that it qualifies, even remotely, as food? Considering that statistics say that one in three American children eat fast food every day, shouldn't we be asking ourselves some serious questions like "why is it even legal to serve that to people, nonetheless to children, and on a regular basis?"Ingredients of a Chicken McNugget said:Of the 32 ingredients in a Chicken McNugget, thirteen can be derived from Corn: The corn fed chicken; corn starch; modified cornstarch; mono-, tri-, and diglycerides; dextrose; lecithin; chicken broth; yellow cornflower; vegetable shortening; partially hydrogenated corn oil; and citric acid. A few other plants are used as ingredients, wheat in the batter, and sometimes hydrogenated oil from soybeans, canola, or cotton is used in place of that from corn. McNuggets also contain several completely synthetic ingredients: sodium aluminum phosphate; mono-calcium phosphate; sodium acid pyrophosphate; calcium lactate; dimethylopolysiloxene (which, according to the Handbook of Food Additives, is a suspected carcinogen, as well as a confirmed mutagen, tomorigen, and reproductive effector, it is also flammable); and tertiary butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) [which, according to A Consumer's Dictionary of Food Additives, is a form of butane (lighter fluid) that the FDA allows processors to use sparingly in food: it may comprise no more than 0.02% of the oil in a nugget. Ingesting a single gram of TBHQ can cause nausea, vomiting, ringing in the ears, delirium, and a sense of "suffocation and collapse." Five grams of TBHQ can kill.] The nugget is responsible for chicken having passed beef as the most consumed meat in America.
EDIT: Well, it looks like it timed out and cut my poll, sorry folks, no poll today.
How about you get clue that just because chemicals are present doesn't mean it's going to kill you or even harm you. Most of them are there to protect you.
Take for example Potasium Nitrate, added to almost ALL meats. This may startle you if your were utterly ignorant of food science but potassium nitrate is the only safe preservative that prevents the spread of botulism in cut and frozen meat. Botulism causes paralysis of the body and death, its purified toxin is on of the most deadly neurological-agents available to the chemical weapons arsenals...
... and it's 100% natural bacteria and toxin. And if we didn't add this chemical, every piece of meat no matter how well cooked or stored has the risk of killing you.
"Suspected carcinogen" do you even know what you are talking about? That is meaningless, not to mention even CHARCOAL is considered a "suspected carcinogen" yes, ANY food that is fried, grilled, baked, toasted or cooked in any other way than boiling could give you cancer.
So if you are REALLY worried you should live on boiled vegetables for the rest of your life!
Or maybe you will hypocritically skip that one.
"Why would anyone think that it qualifies, even remotely, as food?"
Oh my god, are you serious!?!? IT IS CHICKEN! Flesh from a chicken is cooked, that's food.
"shouldn't we be asking ourselves some serious questions like 'why is it even legal to serve that to people' "
Because it is not dangerous. The FDA has approved it as safe. THAT is why it is legal.
If you are a scientist qualified in this area and have found and proven that any of the chemicals present in Nuggets are dangerous IN THE QUANTITY THAT THEY ARE PRESENT (that's the important part) then show that to the FDA. And if you have a good case then they may consider changing the rules on what is permissible.
DO NOT start an anti-intellectual smear campaign banking on paranoia over "chemical names" to bash a restaurant.
But I'd question your spurious claim of the contents. You CLAIM these chemicals are present though a google search for dimethylopolysiloxENE leads right back to this article:
http://www.google.com/search?q=dimethylopolysiloxene&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB
The word doesn't seem to even exist.
Here is what McDonalds claims is in a Chicken McNugget:
http://nutrition.mcdonalds.com/nutritionexchange/ingredientslist.pdf
However DimethylpolysiloxANE does exist and you know what is actually is? Harmless Silly Putty.
Yeah, that stuff kids have been playing with FOR DECADES, huge giant chunks of the stuff. And here it is only in trace amounts. The stuff is harmless.
Fuck. Sake.
People these days. Did you deliberately miss-spell Dimethylpolysiloxane just so it was harder for people to check up on your bullshit or are you just so scientifically illiterate you mix up your Alkenes and your Alkanes.
You are NOT QUALIFIED to criticise McDonalds for the contents of their food. Get an education on chemistry first. Yeah, freedom of speech you can say what you like, but your words carry n weight.