Poll: Injustice of the Permaban

Recommended Videos

NearLifeExperience

New member
Oct 21, 2012
281
0
0
Xan Krieger said:
The problem is when the moderation permabans someone and the quality of the forum drops. Take for example when they banned Danyal and the quality of R&P went down. I think the mods need to decide which is more important, the rules or the quality of the site?
This is absolutely ridiculous. It would mean that the same rules don't apply to everyone anymore, and posters that are popular can't be touched. Think about it, it's crazy. Everyone, regardless of their popularity, should abide by the rules as everyone else, no exceptions. Quality doesn't drop because of some jerks getting banned. And if you think it did, you are more than welcome to try and crank it up.

Anyway, like I said in another topic: Just follow the rules, it can't be that hard. Think before you submit.
 

Evil Smurf

Admin of Catoholics Anonymous
Nov 11, 2011
11,597
0
0
While I can sympathise with the people who don't like the site's moderation, I can also see that reading up on the Code of Conduct will eliminate the future warnings and bans. So I've been wrathed 7 times, 3 of them were repealed, I should have read the CoC telling me not to endorse adblocking software or do low content posts, potentially offensive posts and I would have gotten no warnings.

Simple: follow the rules, do I like all the rules? No. Do I have to follow them if I want to stay here? Yes. Are (some of) the rules too harsh? Yes, but I chose to go here where the rules apply, I need to follow them.
 

Evil Smurf

Admin of Catoholics Anonymous
Nov 11, 2011
11,597
0
0
paulgruberman said:
1 year, 3 months since you were at level 5. Two sets of 6 month reductions to get to 3. You're 3 months into the next reduction, and 9 months away from the 2 year slate cleaning. That system is simple and automated; the computers are not out to get anyone (yet).
How long do I have to wait?
 

mjc0961

YOU'RE a pie chart.
Nov 30, 2009
3,847
0
0
Drathnoxis said:
I've been lurking these forums for quite some time now, and while I think it's generally a pretty cool place I can't help feel that the super strict moderation is a detriment to the site.
What moderation? I went from being a regular user to only coming on for a few series and maybe clicking on a few interesting looking news articles because of the lack of moderation. The moderation of this forum is of the worst moderation I've ever seen. You're allowed to insult groups of people all you want, just don't insult individuals or you get in trouble. Do you want to call all Americans stupid? Go right ahead, the mods are cool with that! Do you want to call all PC gamers pirates who don't deserve good games because they don't pay for them? That's fine too! Are you an intelligent American who buys all of their PC games who is now offended by the rampant insults being hurled your way? Well you'd better shut up and take it, and don't you dare get mad and call these people out on their bullshit because if you do, that's bad and the moderators will get you!

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that the moderations I have wracked up for becoming justifiably offended at those types of posts are unfair. They're fair, I lost my cool and insulted the guy back, that's a rule violation and I deserved to be moderated. What I am saying is that the other person who started throwing insults first in each situation should have also been moderated. But they don't get moderated, they get away with it by insulting everybody instead of insulting an individual. I know this because on multiple occasions I have reported these posts and come back days, usually at least a week later (as I said, I only come around here for a few of the weekly shows now), and find that the post is still plainly visible for all to see, read, and be insulted by. This tells me that the moderators on this site are clearly okay with this kind of behavior. But why? On every single forum page, there's a link to the forum rules which contains this:

Don't Be a Jerk
This rule trumps any other. Any loophole you think you've found in any other rule is covered by this one. If you make our forums a less pleasant place to be, we don't want you here and we have no problem revoking your account. Here are a couple of the things you should stay away from:
Flaming
Calling people names (or groups who may visit The Escapist), this includes calling others a troll
This tells me that somebody higher up on this site who wrote the rules actually does not want it to be okay for members to insult entire groups of people, so why isn't this rule being enforced? Somebody higher up needs to sit all these moderators down and say "Listen guys, these are the rules we have laid out and you're not enforcing all of them. It's time to start doing a better job, and if you can't do that, we'll replace you with people who can." Because right now, people are making your forums a less pleasant place to be and absolutely nothing is being done about that.

That, and a while back there was a whole crapload of pony spamming going on. You couldn't go into a single thread without people derailing it to post pictures of ponies or talk about the show. And the mods did nothing about that either, which I found very strange because they moderate any post that's deemed to be "low content" because, according to the rules, "These forums are used for discussion and low content posts halt discussion." Yes, low content posts halt discussion, but derailing every thread possible to talk about ponies didn't halt discussion at all... Except for the part where, you know, it halted every discussion that wasn't about ponies.

My final issue is with the report button itself. I hate any report button that just pops up and says "Are you sure you want to report this? YES/NO" without any kind of input. It makes me feel like those in charge don't care why I feel the post is inappropriate. And how do you know what I'm reporting it for anyway if you don't ask? What if I'm reporting something because I feel it's a "Topicless Thread Creation", but the moderator who reviews it looks at it and says "I don't see any flaming or mention of that certain browser add-on that nobody had better ever dare mention" and thus doesn't do anything about it? What if it's like all those damn pony posts the forum used to be plagued with that I mentioned earlier and again, the mod doesn't consider that and just says "No insults, this post can stay"? At the very least, there should be a little window with a list of all the various rules and a radio button next to each one so we can pick what rule we think the post violates.

AnarchistFish said:
Yeah, I'll post what I said in another thread

I feel like most insults are less offensive (I'm not even sure how some of these are even found offensive or considered insults) than the passing aggressive remarks stringent rules like these encourage. People won't usually respond with those words unprovoked and they're not always unjustified.
Quoted for truth.

Dags90 said:
Hopefully no one on the entire internet finds this post offensive, or I'm in trouble.
Doesn't matter, they don't enforce that rule.

SanAndreasSmoke said:
Hell, I've seen other posters say the exact same thing without getting a warning, just in a more subtle, passive-aggressive manner. I actually find that to be worse because then you have condescension mixed in as well.
Once again, quoted for truth. I'm very glad I'm not the only one who's seen this going on.

Susan Arendt said:
Our rules are in place so that the community as a whole can enjoy themselves while they're here.
Now all you have to do is get some moderators in place that will actually enforce those rules and maybe people will be able to enjoy themselves while they're here. Until then, I won't be back until next Monday when there's a new Jimquisition to watch, because I'm sure not coming back tomorrow for the community that's allowed free reign to insult me for being American and playing PC games among other things.
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
Forgive the dead horse I'm about to brutally chainsaw but as stated by several mods and Susan in this thread, if you don't learn your lesson after 8 (!) opportunities then it's not our fault you can't follow the rules which are always available to read under the 'Forums' drop down menu above.

chozo_hybrid said:
Eleuthera said:
It's 8 strikes actually, not 10.

Really you don't just accidentally make 8 low-content posts. One or two before you understand the rules, maybe.

It's really not that hard to not insult people, if someone insults you, report them and let it go. If someone disagrees with you or even if someone has repulsive ideas on any subject, discuss things civilly or leave the discussion.

There's really only 1 rule: make sure your content is worthwhile.

Insults aren't, low content isn't, spam isn't, being a jerk isn't
Question, I've never faced Mod wrath, but I was wondering if it's possible to work off the strikes with good behavior etc? How long does it take, or is there no removing them.
Every 6 months without receiving any kind of mod wrath will make your health bar drop by one level. After 2 straight years of nothing then you are reduced to a clean slate, regardless of where you started from!
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
paulgruberman said:
Therumancer said:
To be honest I'm not sure if marks EVER go away, I have 3 strikes on me as the result of a single event (a ban that was reversed) and I'm pretty sure it was over 2 years ago at this point, and definatly well over six months where one of the marks should have disappeared.
1 year, 3 months since you were at level 5. Two sets of 6 month reductions to get to 3. You're 3 months into the next reduction, and 9 months away from the 2 year slate cleaning. That system is simple and automated; the computers are not out to get anyone (yet).
Ahh okay, thanks for the information! :)
 
Dec 14, 2009
15,526
0
0
TimeLord said:
Forgive the dead horse I'm about to brutally chainsaw but as stated by several mods and Susan in this thread, if you don't learn your lesson after 8 (!) opportunities then it's not our fault you can't follow the rules which are always available to read under the 'Forums' drop down menu above.

chozo_hybrid said:
Eleuthera said:
It's 8 strikes actually, not 10.

Really you don't just accidentally make 8 low-content posts. One or two before you understand the rules, maybe.

It's really not that hard to not insult people, if someone insults you, report them and let it go. If someone disagrees with you or even if someone has repulsive ideas on any subject, discuss things civilly or leave the discussion.

There's really only 1 rule: make sure your content is worthwhile.

Insults aren't, low content isn't, spam isn't, being a jerk isn't
Question, I've never faced Mod wrath, but I was wondering if it's possible to work off the strikes with good behavior etc? How long does it take, or is there no removing them.
Every 6 months without receiving any kind of mod wrath will make your health bar drop by one level. After 2 straight years of nothing then you are reduced to a clean slate, regardless of where you started from!
I'm still totally not bitter.

Not bitter at all.

[sub]TimeLord, I will pay you money.[/sub]
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
Daystar Clarion said:
I'm still totally not bitter.

Not bitter at all.

[sub]TimeLord, I will pay you money.[/sub]
Leaving aside that you are attempting to bribe completely the wrong person, you are only 3 1/2 months away from losing a notch from your bar.
 

kyuzo3567

New member
Jan 31, 2011
234
0
0
I joined this site when they already had the 8 strike rule and the convenient health bar on our profiles for posts and warnings so I have no experience with what the earlier systems were, but I don't think the mods here are too strict at all.
I do have a question though, how do you get strikes for low-content warnings? Does it happen because someone flags your comment, or is there a different system checking the length of posts to find them? I'm genuinely curious and figure I'll get an answer faster if I post in here.

Susan Arendt said:
Depends on what you want to discuss. Something like "should drugs be legalized" is totally fair game. But admitting to committing a crime - which taking or selling drugs is in the US - is a bit of a gray area for us. It could, in theory, get us into legal trouble. If we have evidence you're committing a crime and do nothing about it, we could theoretically be held liable. Yes, we really could.

So if you want to talk about drugs in the abstract, fine, but refrain from telling us about the amazing you time you had snorting lines off your Vita's screen, ok?
Sorry, I just wanted to say that I really love reading your posts in the forums whenever I come across them, and that last line of yours is basically a perfect example of why.
 
Dec 14, 2009
15,526
0
0
TimeLord said:
Daystar Clarion said:
I'm still totally not bitter.

Not bitter at all.

[sub]TimeLord, I will pay you money.[/sub]
Leaving aside that you are attempting to bribe completely the wrong person, you are only 3 1/2 months away from losing a notch from your bar.
[sub]Shut up, I will pay you moar money![/sub]


That's a notch though, I was close to having it all wiped out.

I wanted the Tetris of health bar renewals.
 

Yuuki

New member
Mar 19, 2013
995
0
0
It's extremely easy to avoid warnings/bans - steer clear of gender-controversy topics. This includes stuff like rape, sexism in games, sexism anywhere else, racism, sexism, homosexual rights, any form of discrimination, sexism, you get the idea.

Those topics are basically breeding grounds for warnings/bans to be handed out, judging from what I have seen in my rather short time here. If you really must post in those topics (since they're currently "in"), you need to triple-check your posts because it's quite easy to slip out something that someone or the other will find offensive and have them scrambling to hit the report button.

To avoid low-content warnings simply drag your sentence(s) out with extra words, just flesh it out. E.g. instead of saying "good video!" you can say "I say dear chap, I found this video to be a jolly good show and I do implore you to keep up the spiffing work."

Every site/forum has different moderators and it's in your best interest to figure out how to avoid setting them off - usually the rules are enough, but they don't always paint the full picture of moderation.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Sassafrass said:
The moderation here is fine as it is, it's only when the big names at the time get banned the moderation suddenly becomes a damn problem.

Seriously. No one was complaining about this til a week or so ago.
And even though I'm firmly on Team Bring-Back-Vault101, I do grasp that she made a slip that finally took her out. It's good that the mods are at least consistent.

Anyways, no, the system looks like it works. If you watch yourself, you'll have no issues with it. I have an "occasional slip" trend, but my forum meter drains faster than it rises.

Plus, I find the mods actually dislike handing the wrath out. I managed to lock a thread without getting any more punishment than an angry glare. Maybe I should have gotten a warning for that, but I didn't.
 

Charli

New member
Nov 23, 2008
3,445
0
0
Um... no. I've never received a single warning on this website. I've received two on another, a ban on one other.

The Escapist is pretty lax compared to some web forums harboring knee-jerk nazi moderators I've been apart of.


Most warnings and bans I've seen dished out have been firm but fair.

Also some advice: If you read a topic you feel will push your buttons in a negative manner, try hard to abstain from posting. You're not you when you're angry and tons of furious responses are rushing through your brain without filter. Or at least give the topic a while to find it's footing and let someone else take the heat so you can think clearer.
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
kyuzo3567 said:
I joined this site when they already had the 8 strike rule and the convenient health bar on our profiles for posts and warnings so I have no experience with what the earlier systems were, but I don't think the mods here are too strict at all.
I do have a question though, how do you get strikes for low-content warnings? Does it happen because someone flags your comment, or is there a different system checking the length of posts to find them? I'm genuinely curious and figure I'll get an answer faster if I post in here.
No form is moderation is 'automated' (as in mod wrath handed out by a computer program). Low content posts have to be reported by the community (or found by us along with anything else that needs moderator attention when we randomly browse the forums) the same as every other post that is reported and they all get seen the same way we see every other post.

A common misconception which you bring up yourself is that Low content posts are about length. They aren't, they are about low content. Posting to simply say "lol" is definitely low content but not because it's a low letter count. Something along the lines of saying "I have no opinion one way or the other and am posting in this thread for no reason" is also low content as it does not contribute to the thread discussion in any way.

Also, writing;

"This

Extra words to avoid mod wrath"

Doesn't work. In fact if anything, it'll attract more users to report you because you are drawing attention to the fact that you think you are trying to avoid moderation.
 

Knight Captain Kerr

New member
May 27, 2011
1,283
0
0
There is far worse out there but the moderation isn't the best either. It is more good than bad but they could still do with some improvement. The strike policy, I can see the logic behind it but I don't think it is the best way to handle things. It can easily lead to death by 1000 cuts, a user doing lots of little things that will get banned. It is hard to make a banning rule that applies to everyone in all situations. Context really is key, things do have to be taken on a case by case basis when it comes to banning. A suspension isn't that bad, but a ban? Banning is a really extreme measure. It should be a last resort for when there really is no other way. Such an action shouldn't be taken lightly. I think this forum has banned some users that it didn't have to ban.
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
Daystar Clarion said:
[sub]Shut up, I will pay you moar money![/sub]


That's a notch though, I was close to having it all wiped out.

I wanted the Tetris of health bar renewals.
Shouldn't have slipped up then should you? I can't help you there to erase your own mistakes.
You'll just have to wait like everyone else ;)

lacktheknack said:
Plus, I find the mods actually dislike handing the wrath out. I managed to lock a thread without getting any more punishment than an angry glare. Maybe I should have gotten a warning for that, but I didn't.
We don't want to warn/suspend/ban anyone. But if we didn't then we'd end up with a forum overrun with Emperor only knows how many insults, trolls, adverts, porn and everything else in between! At the end of the day what we do works, and while it continues to work without the forums falling down around our ears, we will continue to do it.
 

Xan Krieger

Completely insane
Feb 11, 2009
2,918
0
0
NearLifeExperience said:
Xan Krieger said:
The problem is when the moderation permabans someone and the quality of the forum drops. Take for example when they banned Danyal and the quality of R&P went down. I think the mods need to decide which is more important, the rules or the quality of the site?
This is absolutely ridiculous. It would mean that the same rules don't apply to everyone anymore, and posters that are popular can't be touched. Think about it, it's crazy. Everyone, regardless of their popularity, should abide by the rules as everyone else, no exceptions. Quality doesn't drop because of some jerks getting banned. And if you think it did, you are more than welcome to try and crank it up.

Anyway, like I said in another topic: Just follow the rules, it can't be that hard. Think before you submit.
Yeah it does sound bad but it's not like other people are treated differently. Jim Sterling is allowed to be as offensive as he wants and he's never even gotten a warning.
 

Bara_no_Hime

New member
Sep 15, 2010
3,646
0
0
Drathnoxis said:
Um, no.

I have over 6000 posts, I'm a regular member, often posting in controversial topics like feminism and gender threads.

Check it out - no strikes.

As long as one is polite - and knows when to walk away - one can post often and avoid issues that would cause one to get Warnings.

Personally, I think the moderation has been too lenient lately. But my thoughts on that have been covered in another thread.
 

Calcium

New member
Dec 30, 2010
529
0
0
Well, "injustice of the permaban" and "is forum moderation too harsh" are two different things I'd say. I've gone 500+ posts without ever receiving a warning. Whenever I've seen a moderated post I never really think "that's unfair!" A couple of times I've seen people permabanned without a reference, but they were low posters, so I assume they were people trying to get around existing bans by making new accounts.